- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02926144
Does McGRATH® MAC Videolaryngoscope Decrease the Number of People Required to Perform Intubation During Anesthesia ? (MGM3)
Can the Use of the McGRATH® MAC Videolaryngoscope Decrease the Number of People Required for Tracheal Intubation in a Population of Patients Without Predicted Difficult Intubation?
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Videolaryngoscopes, such as McGRATH® MAC videolaryngoscope, are used to facilitate tracheal intubations. This study is designed to evaluate the proportion of cases requiring more than one member of the anesthesiology team when the video feature of McGRATH® MAC is available during laryngoscopy in a population of patients without a predicted difficult intubation (Arne's score <11).
General anesthesia from induction until tracheal intubation is recorded on a video for further analysis. Analysis includes characteristics of intubation, patient's monitoring and cooperation between anesthesiologists in two groups. In the control group, the screen of the McGRATH® MAC videolaryngoscope is hidden. In the experimental group, the McGRATH® MAC videolaryngoscope is used with its video feature.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Levallois-Perret, France, 92300
- Institut Hospitalier Franco Britannique
-
Paris, France, 75019
- Fondation Ophtalmologique Adolphe de Rothschild
-
Soyaux, France, 16800
- Centre Clinical
-
Suresnes, France, 92150
- Hopital Foch
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged 18 years old minimum
- Requiring general anesthesia and orotracheal intubation with a single lumen tube
- Having signed an inform consent form
- Having a telephone and agreeing to communicate their phone number
- Benefiting from a social insurance scheme or beneficiary
Exclusion Criteria:
- Pregnant or breast-feeding women
- Patients taken care in ambulatory surgery who could not be contacted within 24 hours following surgery
- Patients having a predicted difficult intubation (Arné's score ≥ 11) or predicted difficult mask ventilation
- patients requiring a rapid-sequence intubation
- patients for whom general anesthesia using sufentanil, propofol, atracurium or rocuronium is not suitable.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Laryngoscope with video
Use of the video-laryngoscope McGrath Mac with use of the video feature
|
Intubation with video-laryngoscope McGrath with use of the video feature
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Laryngoscope without video
Use of the video-laryngoscope McGrath Mac without use of the video feature
|
Endotracheal intubation with video-laryngoscope McGrath without use of the video feature
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of people needed for tracheal intubation when the video feature of McGRATH® MAC videolaryngoscope is available
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Intubation is video and audio recorded for further analysis.
The availability of the video feature of McGRATH® MAC is hidden from the recording.
Only the number of people required and the intubation characteristics can be seen on the video.
|
30 minutes
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Cooperation between members of the anesthesiology team during intubation
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Based on the video recording: Use of the Kraus Scale (based on "Kraus M, Huang C, Keltner D: Tactile Communication, Cooperation and Performance.
Emotion, 2010, 10, 745-9") evaluating communication and gestures within the team
|
30 minutes
|
|
Intubation difficulty Scale (IDS)
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
30 minutes
|
|
|
Number of hands necessary for tracheal intubation
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Based on the video recording: 2 hands when one person intubates by itself without any help, 3 or 4 hands when assistance is given by a second anesthesiologist.
5 to 6 hands when a third person is needed.
|
30 minutes
|
|
Time to intubate
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Based on the video recording: from the entrance of the blade in the patient's mouth until the presence of the first capnogram
|
30 minutes
|
|
Esophageal intubation
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
No capnograms during mechanical ventilation once intubation is performed
|
30 minutes
|
|
Intubation failure
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Based on the video recording
|
30 minutes
|
|
Arterial desaturation
Time Frame: 30 minutes maximum
|
Based on the video recording: visualisation of a pulse oximetry inferior to 92%
|
30 minutes maximum
|
|
Perception of intubation difficulty by the operator
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Evaluation on a scale between zero (no difficulty at all) to ten (extremely difficult)
|
30 minutes
|
|
Impact of videolaryngoscopy on hemodynamic variables
Time Frame: 30 minutes
|
Based on the video recording: Blood pressure and heart beat on monitoring before and after video laryngoscopy
|
30 minutes
|
|
Evaluation of usual complications after tracheal intubation
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
Sore throat or voice change noticed on day 1
|
24 hours
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Olivier Belze, MD, Hopital Foch
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Estimate)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2016/05
- 2016-A00056-45 (Other Identifier: ANSM)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
IPD Plan Description
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type
- ANALYTIC_CODE
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.