NOACs for Atrial Tachyarrhythmias in Congenital Heart Disease (NOTE)

Prospective Registry of Non-vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants for ThromboEmbolic Prevention in Adult Patients With Atrial Tachyarrhythmias and Congenital Heart Disease (NOTE)

Rationale: Adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) with atrial tachyarrhythmias need to be anticoagulated. It is not known whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in this patient group are efficient and safe.

Aim: The purpose of the NOTE registry is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs for thromboembolic prevention in atrial tachyarrhythmias in adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD).

Methods: In this multicenter prospective registry adult CHD patients with atrial tachyarrhythmias on NOACs (switch from VKA or new on anticoagulants) will be followed for a minimum of two years.

Primary efficacy endpoints are defined as thromboembolism, i.e. the composite of ischemic stroke, systemic and pulmonary embolism and intracardiac thrombosis, and as the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Primary safety endpoint is defined as major bleeding according to the ISTH criteria. Secondary endpoints include each thromboembolic or bleeding event analysed separately, all-cause mortality, therapy adherence, quality of life, risk assessment of stroke and evaluation of natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmia in adult CHD patients.

Primary endpoint assessment will be performed with a per protocol analysis, and demonstrated as Kaplan Meyer estimates of event free survival and event rates per year.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale: Adult patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) with atrial tachyarrhythmias need to be anticoagulated. It is not known whether non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOAC) in this patient group are efficient and safe.

Aim: The purpose of the NOTE registry is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of NOACs for thromboembolic prevention in atrial tachyarrhythmia's in adult patients with CHD.

Methods: In this multicenter prospective registry adult CHD patients with atrial tachyarrhythmia's on NOACs will be followed for a period of two years.

Patient population: Registry population consists of CHD patients with tachyarrhythmia's, defined as atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia's (AT), including atrial flutter, on NOACs. Patients with new-onset atrial tachyarrhythmia's who are eligible for NOACs, will be started directly on a NOAC. Patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) can be switched actively to NOACs during outpatient clinic visits, in case of agreement of both patient and physician. The switch can be initiated for various reasons, including bleeding complications on VKA, unstable INR measurements, and user friendliness. Eligibility for NOAC use is defined conform clinical practice, i.e. a patient with nonvalvular atrial tachyarrhythmia's, but without a mechanical heart valve, significantly elevated risk of bleeding, impaired renal function, or pregnancy.

Registration process: Patients will be included in the registry at start of NOAC treatment. Exclusion criteria are an expected survival of less than two years and an additional indication for anticoagulation besides atrial tachyarrhythmia's. At baseline general patient characteristics will be registered. Standard echocardiography and laboratory assessments for follow-up in adult CHD patients will be recorded during the registration period. Quality of life and therapy adherence will be assessed with questionnaires. Registry follow-up will be warranted by telephone contact or during outpatient clinic visits. At each follow-up point the occurrence of pre-defined events will be recorded. A detailed description of each variable used by the registry is provided in the protocol. Anonymized data will be collected at each investigational site and entered in a central database at the main investigational site (Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands).

Quality assurance: At all investigational sites the investigators are trained to the registry protocol, case report forms and registry procedures prior to enrolling subjects. The assigned monitoring investigator at the main site, will assure regular site monitoring and auditing at all investigational sites. Source data will be verified by comparing the data to medical records and case report forms in the form of a random sample. To avoid or minimize bias, an independent clinical events committee at the main investigational site, consisting of independent physicians, assesses all primary endpoint clinical events. Intermediate evaluation will take place one year after enrollment of the last patient and consists of a verification of recorded data, assessment of accuracy of patient follow-up and primary endpoint analysis.

Drop-outs: Patients who quite NOACs or are lost to follow-up are considered drop-outs. Those who (temporarily) quite NOACs will be followed until the total follow-up of 2 years will be completed. The events that occur in the period off-NOAC will not be included in the analyses. A clear description of the reason of NOAC arrest or interruption and possible alternative anticoagulant therapy is assessed.

Endpoints: Primary efficacy endpoints are defined as thromboembolism, i.e. the composite of ischemic stroke, systemic and pulmonary embolism and intracardiac thrombosis, and as the composite of stroke and systemic embolism. Primary safety endpoint is defined as major bleeding according to the ISTH criteria. Secondary endpoints include each thromboembolic or bleeding event analyzed separately, all-cause mortality, therapy adherence, quality of life, risk assessment of stroke and evaluation of natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmia in adult CHD patients.

Sample size: By using estimates of event rates in the described patient population (thromboembolism event rate of 1.4% per year, mainly on VKA; unpublished data) and a relative risk reduction of 0.81 for stroke or systemic embolism on NOACs compared to VKA [Ruff et al, Lancet 2013], a sample size of 300 patients followed for two years is necessary to demonstrate the safety of NOACs for thromboembolic prevention with a safety margin of 2.7% thromboembolic events per year.

Statistical analysis: Endpoint assessment will be performed with a per protocol analysis, and demonstrated as Kaplan Meyer (KM) estimates of event free survival and event rates per year. The results will be compared with KM estimates and event rates from a historical similar cohort on VKA in a non-inferiority assay. Drop-outs (see below) will be censored at time of drop-out in time-to-event analyses, and included for event-rate analyses up to time of drop-out. No adjustment or imputation of missing data will be performed and all available data will be presented.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands, 1105AZ
        • Recruiting
        • Academic Medical Center
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Hayang Yang, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Berto Bouma, MD PhD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Barbara Mulder, MD PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Registry population consists of CHD patients with tachyarrhythmia's, defined as atrial fibrillation (AF) or atrial tachycardia's (AT), including atrial flutter, on NOACs. Patients with new-onset atrial tachyarrhythmia's who are eligible for NOACs, will be started directly on a NOAC. Patients on vitamin K antagonists (VKA) can be switched actively to NOACs during outpatient clinic visits, in case of agreement of both patient and physician. The switch can be initiated for various reasons, including bleeding complications on VKA, unstable INR measurements, and user friendliness. Eligibility for NOAC use is defined conform clinical practice, i.e. a patient with nonvalvular atrial tachyarrhythmia's, but without a mechanical heart valve, significantly elevated risk of bleeding, impaired renal function, or pregnancy.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Atrial tachyarrhythmia
  • Congenital heart disease
  • Treatment with NOAC

Exclusion Criteria:

  • expected survival of less than two years
  • additional indication for anticoagulation besides atrial tachyarrhythmia's

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Thromboembolism
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
The composite of ischemic stroke, systemic and pulmonary embolism and intracardiac thrombosis
2 years after enrolment
Stroke
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
2 years after enrolment
Major bleeding
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
The composite of fatal bleeding, symptomatic bleeding in a critical organ (e.g. central nervous system, retroperitoneal, pericardial, intramuscular with compartment syndrome), and bleeding of any kind with the need for >1 packed cell, or a decrease in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/l / 1,24 mmol/l. [International Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis (ISTH) criteria]
2 years after enrolment
Systemic embolism
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
2 years after enrolment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
All-cause mortality
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
2 years after enrolment
Myocardial infarction
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Defined as the detection of a significant rise/fall of cardiac biomarkers in association with symptoms of ischemia, ECG changes, proof of ischemia on imaging or intracoronary thrombus at angiography. [Third definition of myocardial infarction; European Society of Cardiology (ESC) 2012]
2 years after enrolment
Cardiac or non-cardiac surgical and percutaneous interventions
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
2 years after enrolment
Minor bleedings
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Defined as all bleedings that do not meet the criteria for major bleedings [ISTH criteria]
2 years after enrolment
General quality of life
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Quality of life assessed with questionnaire SF-36
2 years after enrolment
Quality of life under anticoagulation
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Quality of life assessed with questionnaire PACT-Q
2 years after enrolment
Therapy adherence
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Therapy adherence assessed with questionnaire Morisky-8
2 years after enrolment

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Progression of symptoms in EHRA classification
2 years after enrolment
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Change of antiarrhythmic medication
2 years after enrolment
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Occurence of ablations
2 years after enrolment
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Occurence of electrical cardioversion
2 years after enrolment
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Occurence of heart failure described with NYHA classification
2 years after enrolment
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Occurence of heart failure described by echocardiography, ejection fraction
2 years after enrolment
Natural history of atrial tachyarrhythmias in CHD
Time Frame: 2 years after enrolment
Occurence of heart failure by measuring NT-proBNP
2 years after enrolment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Hayang Yang, MD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Study Chair: Barbara Mulder, MD PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
  • Study Chair: Berto Bouma, MD PhD, Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2015

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

October 10, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

October 10, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 6, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe