Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Retro-infundibular Approach

October 29, 2016 updated by: Alaa Mstafa Hassan Sewefy, Minia University

Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Retro-infundibular Approach Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Difficult Cases, Where Calot's Triangle is Unsafe to be Dissected

Aimed to evaluate laparoscopic cholecystectomy by retro-infundibular (RI) approach compared to standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy (SLC) in difficult cases with scarred chole-cystohepatic (Calot's) triangle.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study is a prospective cohort study, conducted in Minia university hospital and Minia insurance hospital in the period from July 2013 to January 2016, where 597 patients with gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were done by the same surgeon. Based on the preoperative scoring system to predict the degree of difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients that had the score > 6 and were fit for laparoscopic surgery were included in the study. Only 125 met these criteria and agreed to share in the study and gave their informed consent. 60 patients were operated by SLC (Group 1).This included the classic dissection of Calot's triangle to achieve the CVS, with separate clipping and division of cystic duct and artery. While, 65 patients were operated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy using RI approach (Group 2). This included separation of the lower third of GB from its bed down to its pedicle (artery and duct) with mass ligation of both.

Operative procedure of by RI approach:

The site of trocars was the same as for the standard cholecystectomy. After dissection of adhesion masking the GB, if present, to reach the Hartmann pouch, at this point Calot's triangle usually was scarred and frozen, the surgeon never tried to dissect it and instead the surgeon continued as follow :

  1. De-shouldering of GB: by incising the serosal covering on either side of the infundibulum and lower part of the body.
  2. This followed by dissection and separation of the lower third of GB body from its bed, using suction-irrigation probe or hook dissector. Dissection continued downward till the GB pedicle (duct and artery).
  3. Mass ligation of cystic artery and duct, using intracorporeal note by vicryl number 1 suture.
  4. Then the surgeon cut above the ligature using diathermy on scissor or ultrasound sealing device. During this step the cut end of the GB was grasped by forceps trying to prevent spillage of its content, if happened, stones were collected in a bag and extracted.
  5. Then GB was dissected from its bed as usual and extracted in a bag. In cases where the GB was hugely distended, it was aspirated firstly to facilitate its grasping. Also in cases of Mirizzi syndrome the GB was opened direct on the stone to remove it, to facilitate grasping of GB then we continued as described above

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Minia, Egypt, 61511
        • Faculty of medicine
      • Minia, Egypt, 61511
        • Minia University Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patient with gallstones
  • score difficulty according to Gupta et al 2013 > 6
  • patient fit for laparoscopic surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • score difficulty according to Gupta et al 2013 > 6
  • patient unfit for laparoscopic surgery
  • refusal to share in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: NONE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy
This included the classic dissection of Calot's triangle to achieve the CVS, with separate clipping and division of cystic duct and artery.
which included the classic dissection of Calot's triangle to achieve the CVS, with separate clipping and division of cystic duct and artery
Other Names:
  • SLC
EXPERIMENTAL: RI approach

Retroinfundibular laparoscopic cholecystectomy: This included separation of the lower third of GB from its bed down to its pedicle (artery and duct) with mass ligation of both.

Operative procedure of by RI approach:

which included separation of the lower third of GB from its bed down to its pedicle (artery and duct) with mass ligation of both.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
conversion to open
Time Frame: 24 hours
the incidence of conversion to open
24 hours
biliary injury
Time Frame: 2 weeks
the incidence of biliary injury
2 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
operative time
Time Frame: 24 hours
time from skin opening to skin closure
24 hours
hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 weeks
time of hospital stay
6 weeks
mortality
Time Frame: 6 weeks
incidence of operative related mortality
6 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Alaa M Sewefy, MD, Lecturer & consultant of general surgery, Department of surgery, Minia university hospital, Egypt.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

July 1, 2013

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

January 1, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 22, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 26, 2016

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

October 27, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)

November 1, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2016

Last Verified

October 1, 2016

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Gallstones

Clinical Trials on standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy

3
Subscribe