- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT02947256
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Retro-infundibular Approach
Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy With Retro-infundibular Approach Versus Standard Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Difficult Cases, Where Calot's Triangle is Unsafe to be Dissected
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
This study is a prospective cohort study, conducted in Minia university hospital and Minia insurance hospital in the period from July 2013 to January 2016, where 597 patients with gallstones were admitted for laparoscopic cholecystectomy and were done by the same surgeon. Based on the preoperative scoring system to predict the degree of difficulty in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, patients that had the score > 6 and were fit for laparoscopic surgery were included in the study. Only 125 met these criteria and agreed to share in the study and gave their informed consent. 60 patients were operated by SLC (Group 1).This included the classic dissection of Calot's triangle to achieve the CVS, with separate clipping and division of cystic duct and artery. While, 65 patients were operated by laparoscopic cholecystectomy using RI approach (Group 2). This included separation of the lower third of GB from its bed down to its pedicle (artery and duct) with mass ligation of both.
Operative procedure of by RI approach:
The site of trocars was the same as for the standard cholecystectomy. After dissection of adhesion masking the GB, if present, to reach the Hartmann pouch, at this point Calot's triangle usually was scarred and frozen, the surgeon never tried to dissect it and instead the surgeon continued as follow :
- De-shouldering of GB: by incising the serosal covering on either side of the infundibulum and lower part of the body.
- This followed by dissection and separation of the lower third of GB body from its bed, using suction-irrigation probe or hook dissector. Dissection continued downward till the GB pedicle (duct and artery).
- Mass ligation of cystic artery and duct, using intracorporeal note by vicryl number 1 suture.
- Then the surgeon cut above the ligature using diathermy on scissor or ultrasound sealing device. During this step the cut end of the GB was grasped by forceps trying to prevent spillage of its content, if happened, stones were collected in a bag and extracted.
- Then GB was dissected from its bed as usual and extracted in a bag. In cases where the GB was hugely distended, it was aspirated firstly to facilitate its grasping. Also in cases of Mirizzi syndrome the GB was opened direct on the stone to remove it, to facilitate grasping of GB then we continued as described above
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Phase 2
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Minia, Egypt, 61511
- Faculty of medicine
-
Minia, Egypt, 61511
- Minia University Hospital
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- patient with gallstones
- score difficulty according to Gupta et al 2013 > 6
- patient fit for laparoscopic surgery
Exclusion Criteria:
- score difficulty according to Gupta et al 2013 > 6
- patient unfit for laparoscopic surgery
- refusal to share in the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: NON_RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: PARALLEL
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy
This included the classic dissection of Calot's triangle to achieve the CVS, with separate clipping and division of cystic duct and artery.
|
which included the classic dissection of Calot's triangle to achieve the CVS, with separate clipping and division of cystic duct and artery
Other Names:
|
EXPERIMENTAL: RI approach
Retroinfundibular laparoscopic cholecystectomy: This included separation of the lower third of GB from its bed down to its pedicle (artery and duct) with mass ligation of both. Operative procedure of by RI approach: |
which included separation of the lower third of GB from its bed down to its pedicle (artery and duct) with mass ligation of both.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
conversion to open
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
the incidence of conversion to open
|
24 hours
|
biliary injury
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
the incidence of biliary injury
|
2 weeks
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
operative time
Time Frame: 24 hours
|
time from skin opening to skin closure
|
24 hours
|
hospital stay
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
time of hospital stay
|
6 weeks
|
mortality
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
incidence of operative related mortality
|
6 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Alaa M Sewefy, MD, Lecturer & consultant of general surgery, Department of surgery, Minia university hospital, Egypt.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ESTIMATE)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ESTIMATE)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- fac.med.011
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Gallstones
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedCommon Bile Duct GallstonesEgypt
-
Minia UniversityCompletedGallstones Complicated by CBD StonesEgypt
-
Mansoura UniversityCompletedCommon Bile Duct GallstonesEgypt
-
Seoul National University HospitalUnknownCommon Bile Duct GallstonesKorea, Republic of
-
Hospital General Universitario de AlicanteInstituto de Salud Carlos IIINot yet recruitingAcute Pancreatitis Due to GallstonesSpain
-
Yonsei UniversityTerminatedGallbladder Polyp | Asymptomatic Gallstones Without CholecystitisKorea, Republic of
-
Air Force Military Medical University, ChinaCompletedCommon Bile Duct Gall Stones | Common Bile Duct GallStonesChina
-
Hospital Central "Dr. Ignacio Morones Prieto"CompletedAcute Pancreatitis Due to Gallstones
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalBoston Scientific CorporationUnknownCholedocholithiasis | Common Bile Duct GallstonesBrazil
-
University of CagliariUniversità di Napoli Federico II; Università della Campania Luigi VanvitelliNot yet recruitingAcute Pancreatitis | Pancreatitis Biliary | Pancreatitis Relapsing | Pancreatitis Due to GallstonesItaly
Clinical Trials on standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy
-
University of AthensUnknownCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicGreece
-
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas CityCompletedBiliary Dyskinesia | CholelithiasisUnited States
-
Peking Union Medical College HospitalUnknownCholecystitis; Gallstone | Cholecystitis/Cholelithiasis | Polyp GallbladderChina
-
Hadassah Medical OrganizationCompletedCholelithiasisIsrael
-
Sohag UniversityRecruitingCholelithiasesEgypt
-
Damanhour Teaching HospitalCompletedAcute CholecystitisEgypt
-
Helsinki University Central HospitalCompleted
-
G. Hatzikosta General HospitalUniversity of Ioannina; Demokrition University of ThraceCompletedLaparoscopy | Cholecystectomy | Uncomplicated Cholelithiasis | Standard Technique | Single Port LaparoscopyGreece
-
China-Japan Friendship HospitalCompletedA Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial of Lower Abdominal Three-port Laparoscopic CholecystectomyGallbladder Stone | Gallbladder PolypChina
-
Hospital PlatóCompleted