Indirect Calorimetry: SensorMedics Vmax vs GE Carescape - a Method Comparison Study

February 25, 2020 updated by: Gunnar Bentsen, Oslo University Hospital
Dosing of nutrition in PICUs is mainly based on patient weight and assumptions on clinical status. There is however poor correlation between these calculations and actual energy consumption measured with indirect calorimetry (IC). Available equipment for IC has however been too cumbersome to use in daily clinical practice. Of relative new date is IC integrated in modern ventilators. This functionality is easy to use, but we do not know if the results are reliable for children. This study is a method comparison study comparing measurements done with SensorMedics Vmax ("gold standard") vs GE Carescape (modern ventilator with Integrated IC) in children undergoing intensive care treatment.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

6

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Oslo, Norway, 0871
        • Oslo University Hospital, Rikshospitalet

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 18 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Children undergoing intensive care treatment

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • < 18 years of age,
  • endotracheally intubated.
  • FiO2 < 0,6, tube leak < 10%, tidal volume > 50 ml.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ventilatory and hemodynamically unstable during 2 hours prior to inclusion.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
MEE (measured energy expenditure) kcal/kg/day, RQ (respiratory quotient)
Time Frame: 2 hours
Comparison of measurements made by two different instruments
2 hours

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gunnar Bentsen, MD PhD, Oslo University Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 30, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 24, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

February 24, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 18, 2016

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2016

First Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2016

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

February 27, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 25, 2020

Last Verified

February 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016_InKal1

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Critical Illness

Subscribe