Effect of Kinesiotaping on Force Irradiation

September 7, 2018 updated by: Bezmialem Vakif University

The Determination of Relationship Between Kinesiotaping and Contralateral Force Irradiation

The study is assessed the electromyographic activity response of non-dominant biceps brachii muscle during unilateral-dominant concentric, eccentric and isometric biceps brachii muscle contractions under kinesiotaping and non-taping conditions. The aim of the study is to determine the synergistic effect of kinesiotaping which is applied on non-dominant biceps brachii muscle on force irradiation.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Fourty healthy subjects with no history of neurological or recent musculoskeletal injury will participate the study.

Healthy subjects are arranged in two groups of stimulation: kinesiotaping group (kinesiotaping and force irradiation) and control group (only force irradiation). The electromyographic response of the resting arm (non-dominant) will be assessed during the dominant arm movement for all subjects. Additionally, in kinesiotaping group, kinesiotaping will be applied 24 hours before the experiment.

The electromyographic response of the resting arm will be assessed under three contraction type movement (isometric, eccentric and concentric contractions) The SEMG signals are analysed by using MATLAB®, suitable signal proccessing techniques (linear envelope, Root Mean Square etc) are chosed. The statistical analysis are done by using SPSS®, according to data distribution, "Independent Sample T Test" or "Mann-Whitney U Test" is utilized for comparing outcomes of control and KT groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Istanbul, Turkey
        • Bezmialem Vakıf University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 30 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • To be right-handed-dominant
  • To have normal or corrected vision
  • To have no formal history of any resistance training.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • To have history of neurological or recent musculoskeletal injury

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Kinesiotaping Group
The group in which kinesiotaping is applied to non-dominant biceps brachii muscle of participants before 24 hours the force irradiation experiment.
For the force irradiation, while the subjects perform dominant elbow flexion at an angular velocity of 60°/s for concentric contractions, 30°/s for eccentric contractions, at 90° elbow flexion position for isometric contractions with a maximal effort level, electrical activity of the non-dominant biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles are recorded.
For kinesiotaping, the elbow positioned in 30°-45° flexion and kinesiotaping facilitation technique is applied origin to insertion of non-dominant biceps brachii muscle before 24 hours the experiment.
Other Names:
  • Force Irradiation
Active Comparator: Control group
The group in which the participants only perform the the force irradiation experiment.
For the force irradiation, while the subjects perform dominant elbow flexion at an angular velocity of 60°/s for concentric contractions, 30°/s for eccentric contractions, at 90° elbow flexion position for isometric contractions with a maximal effort level, electrical activity of the non-dominant biceps brachii and triceps brachii muscles are recorded.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the surface electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii muscle by using surface electromyography device while the right elbow performs isometric elbow flexion
Time Frame: after inclusion
while the right elbow performs isometric elbow flexion, electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii was determined by using surface electromyography device. After signal processing and normalization, the electromyographic data of kinesiotaping and control groups will be compared.
after inclusion
Measurement of the surface electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii muscle by using surface electromyography device while the right elbow performs isometric elbow flexion
Time Frame: after inclusion
while the right elbow performs isometric elbow flexion, electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii was determined by using surface electromyography device. After signal processing and normalization, the electromyographic data of kinesiotaping and control groups will be compared.
after inclusion
Measurement of the surface electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii muscle by using surface electromyography device while the right elbow performs concentric elbow flexion.
Time Frame: after inclusion
while the right elbow performs concentric elbow flexion, electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii was determined by using surface electromyography device. After signal processing and normalization, the electromyographic data of kinesiotaping and control groups will be compared.
after inclusion
Measurement of the surface electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii muscle by using surface electromyography device while the right elbow performs concentric elbow flexion
Time Frame: after inclusion
while the right elbow performs isometric elbow flexion, electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii was determined by using surface electromyography device. After signal processing and normalization, the electromyographic data of kinesiotaping and control groups will be compared.
after inclusion
Measurement of the surface electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii muscle by using surface electromyography device while the right elbow performs eccentric elbow flexion
Time Frame: after inclusion
while the right elbow performs eccentric elbow flexion, electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii was determined by using surface electromyography device. After signal processing and normalization, the electromyographic data of kinesiotaping and control groups will be compared.
after inclusion
Measurement of the surface electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii muscle by using surface electromyography device while the right elbow performs eccentric elbow flexion
Time Frame: after inclusion
while the right elbow performs eccentric elbow flexion, electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii was determined by using surface electromyography device. After signal processing and normalization, the electromyographic data of kinesiotaping and control groups will be compared.
after inclusion

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Measurement of the electromyographic activity of left biceps brachii muscle during left elbow maximum isometric flexion by using electromyography device.
Time Frame: after inclusion
Electromyographic activity of left elbow maximum isometric flexion is used for normalizing force irradiation data of left biceps brachii muscle
after inclusion
Measurement of the electromyographic activity of left triceps brachii muscle during left elbow maximum isometric extension by using electromyography device.
Time Frame: after inclusion
Electromyographic activity of left elbow maximum isometric extension is used for normalizing force irradiation data of left triceps brachii muscle
after inclusion

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Aydın AKAN, Istanbul University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 10, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 20, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

September 3, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 6, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 19, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 7, 2018

Last Verified

September 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • hdenizkulli

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Healthy

Clinical Trials on Force Irradiation

Subscribe