Comparing Different Suturing Techniques on the Post-operative Morbidity After Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar

April 9, 2018 updated by: Abdul Kalam Azad, Melaka Manipal Medical College

Comparing the Effect of Different Suture Techniques on the Post Operative Morbidity After Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar- A Randomized Clinical Study

This study compares the effect of two types of suturing techniques in the postoperative swelling and mouth opening after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molar. total wound closure will be performed in one group of participants while partial closure will be performed in the other group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Third molar surgeries are mostly associated with pain, swelling and limited mouth opening, referred to as post-operative morbidity. Wound closure technique is an operative factor which is associated with reduced post-operative morbidity. In the total wound closure, the mucoperiosteum is hermetically sealed whereas in the partial wound closure, a window or opening is left to allow for secondary healing. This study therefore compares the effect of partial and total wound closure techniques after surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molar teeth in reducing the swelling and limited mouth opening.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Melaka, Malaysia, 75150
        • Melaka Manipal Medical College

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all patients undergoing surgical removal of mesioangular impacted mandibular third molar.
  • Healthy patients (ASA I) or patients with mild systemic disease with no functional limitations (ASA II).
  • patients who are not allergic to the drugs and local anesthetic agent used in the surgical protocol.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients having systemic conditions that might have an effect on the bone growth or periodontal healing.
  • patients who are on antibiotics premedication or any drugs that might affect wound healing.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Partial wound closure
3 sutures distal to second molar and leaving the vertical releasing incision open without any sutures.
3 sutures distal to second molar and leaving the vertical releasing incision open without any sutures.
Active Comparator: Total wound closure
5 interrupted sutures with 2 sutures closing the vertical releasing incision and 3 sutures distal to second molar leading to a complete hermetic closure of the wound.
5 interrupted sutures with 2 sutures closing the vertical releasing incision and 3 sutures distal to second molar leading to a complete hermetic closure of the wound.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in the Measurement of mouth opening
Time Frame: baseline( preoperative) and 3rd and 7th day postoperatively.
mouth opening is measure by measuring the maximum interincisal distance from the incisal edge of maxillary right central incisor to the incisal edge of the lower right central incisor using a vernier calliper in mm.
baseline( preoperative) and 3rd and 7th day postoperatively.
postoperative swelling
Time Frame: baseline ( preoperative) and 3rd and 7th day postoperatively.
three line measurements were performed in cm using a measuring tape and mean was taken
baseline ( preoperative) and 3rd and 7th day postoperatively.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Abdul Kalam Azad, MDS, Melaka Manipal Medical College

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 10, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2018

Study Completion (Actual)

March 10, 2018

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 1, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 9, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Trismus

Clinical Trials on partial wound closure

3
Subscribe