E-Support Groups in Multiple Sclerosis (eSupport)

August 29, 2020 updated by: Victoria M. Leavitt, Columbia University

A Randomized Controlled Trial of e-Support in Persons With Multiple Sclerosis

Primary objectives:

  • To determine the feasibility of program (80% retained with 75% overall attendance, and completed immediate follow-up questionnaires from 75% of participants).
  • To determine the efficacy of program (evaluated by decreased loneliness, operationalized as decreased total score on the UCLA Loneliness Scale from pre to post intervention).

Secondary objective:

  • To determine whether program will affect depression and quality of life.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study involves prospective data collection from an intervention to investigate the impact of participation by MS patients in a 12-week guided online social support group. All outcomes will be compared to active control group. At the completion of a 12-week interval, all participants (placebo and treatment) will complete follow-up questionnaires. Three months after completing, participants will be sent follow-up questionnaires that will be evaluated as a 6-month follow-up, to assess retention of benefits.

Social support has been linked to better health outcomes in many clinical populations. Multiple sclerosis (MS), a chronic neurological disease that affects over 400,000 people in the United States, involves physical and cognitive disability that can have negative consequences on social integration. This can lead to social isolation, which may be dynamically related to depression, fatigue, and disease progression. The aim of the present study is to investigate the impact of support group involvement on persons with MS. Outcomes of interest include mood, loneliness, and quality of life (QOL). Many people with MS feel isolated and are unable to participate in support groups that meet in locations that may be far from home, difficult to travel to (due to physical disability or lack of resources), or may not be convenient for their schedules. Another hindrance is the apprehension that MS patients sometimes experience when they encounter patients with severe physical disability, or worse impairment than their own. For these reasons, the study is introducing remote support groups to be conducted via the internet, "e-Support." Attending a remote, internet based support group may be more appealing to patients with MS as it obviates the need to travel, thereby reducing cost, time, and energy.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New York
      • New York, New York, United States, 10032
        • Columbia University Medical Center (MS Center)

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of MS (any disease type)
  • Age 18 or over
  • Willingness to sign informed consent document

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to obtain access to the internet

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: e-Support Group
Participants in this arm will receive the treatment, 12 weeks of 1-hr weekly moderated e-Support sessions.
Online (remote), web-based support group via private video link.
Other Names:
  • e-Support
Placebo Comparator: e-Journaling Placebo
Participants in this arm will complete 12 weeks of 1-hr weekly online journaling activities.
Online journaling activity.
Other Names:
  • e-Journaling

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of enrolled participants who completed follow-up questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Assess feasibility of the program: to retain and obtain completed questionnaires at immediate follow-up from 80% of enrolled participants (meeting the criteria of 75% attendance).
12 weeks
Change in UCLA Loneliness Scale total score (please note that the official name of the scale is the UCLA Loneliness Scale).
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks (immediate follow-up)
Assess efficacy of the program to decrease loneliness as defined by a significant decrease in total score on UCLA Loneliness Scale. This name never appears as anything other than UCLA Loneliness Scale, i.e. Russell 1996)
Baseline, 12 weeks (immediate follow-up)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in overall depression [Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)] total score
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Assess efficacy of the program to decrease depression as defined by a significant decrease in total score on Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9): an efficient tool for depression screening. The scale ranges from 0-27, with higher scores indicating worse depression.
Baseline, 12 weeks
Change in overall Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis Quality of Life (FAMS QoL) score
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
Assess efficacy of the program to improve quality of life. The Functional Assessment of Multiple Sclerosis (FAMS) quality of life (QoL) instrument is a disease-specific, self-report questionnaire. It includes 7 subscales. The total score is generated by summing scores across all subscales, and ranges from 0-232, with higher scores reflective or worse overall function. In addition to considering a significant decrease in the total score as an indication of better overall function, we will separately examine each subscale to see whether decreases in score (indicating improvements in function) are shown. This includes the following subscales: mobility, symptoms, emotional well-being, general contentment, thinking and fatigue, family/social well-being, and additional concerns scales.
Baseline, 12 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Victoria M Leavitt, PhD, Columbia University

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 10, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 21, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 21, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

July 2, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 1, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2020

Last Verified

August 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe