Effect of Evogliptin on Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Insufficiency (DA1229)

September 19, 2019 updated by: Jae Hyeon Kim, MD, PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Evogliptin Versus Linagliptin for the Effect on Albuminuria in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes and Renal Insufficiency: a Multicenter, Randomised, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Trial

In this multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase II non-inferiority study, we aimed to test the non-inferiority of evogliptin vs linagliptin in terms of reduction of albuminuria at week 24 from baseline in patients with type 2 diabetes having renal insufficiency.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a multi-center, randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, phase II non-inferiority study. Evogliptin (Trade name, Suganon) is a new, novel dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP4) inhibitor which reveals a favorable results on glucose-lowering effect in patients with diabetes. However, its effect on renal function in patients with diabetes has been uncertained. To compare the effect of evogliptin and linagliptin on the reduction of albuminuria, we will recruit a total of 210 patients with Type 2 diabetes and renal insufficiency and allocate the participants into evogliptin group and linagliptin group with a ratio of 1:1 after radomization from 10 hospitals. After the oral administration of evogliptin 5mg per day or linagliptin 5mg per day for 24 weeks, the percent change of urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) at Week 24 and at baseline will be measured as a primary endpoint. In addition, the percent changes of UACR, hemoglobin A1c, Cystatin-C, Nephrin, N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosaminidase (NAG), glycated albumin, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) between baseline and Week 12 or Week 24 will be studied as secondary endpoints.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

209

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women aged 20 years or older diagnosed with type 2 diabetes.
  • subjects having a level of glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) 7.0% or more, and 10% or less.
  • subjects having urine albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) 30 ug/mg or more, and 3000 ug/mg or less.
  • subjects having estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 30 or more.
  • subjects who had taken angiotensin II receptor blocker(ARB) or angiotensin-converting enzyme(ACE) inhibitors for more than 4 weeks.
  • subjects having body mass index (BMI) 20kg/m2 or more, 40 kg/m2 or less.
  • subjects who entirely understood all the process of clinical study protocol and voluntarily take part in the study and agree to follow rule of the study.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • subjects having type 1 diabetes, secondary diabetes, or gestational diabetes
  • subjects who had a history of surgery of resection of more than a half length of stomach or intestine.
  • subjects having more than three-fold higher levels of Aspartate Transaminase(AST) or Alanine Transaminase(ALT) than upper normal limit.
  • subjects who had taken Dipeptidyl Peptidase4(DPP4)-inhibitor or glucagon-like peptide-1(GLP-1) analogue within 8 weeks prior to screening.
  • subjects who had taken oral triple hypoglycemic agents within 8 weeks prior to screening
  • subjects taking strong cytochrome P450 3A4(CYP3A4) inhibitors or strong cytochrome P450 3A4(CYP3A4) inducers
  • subjects who are pregnants or breast feeding givers.
  • subjects who are unsuitable for clinical trial participation based on clinical laboratory test results or other reasons (e.g. taking chemotherapy or radiation for treatment for cancers).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Evogliptin Group
Intervention group will take daily evogliptin 5mg per oral, not linagliptin 5mg per oral
This group will take daily evogliptin 5mg per oral, not linagliptin.
Other Names:
  • Suganon
Active Comparator: Linagliptin Group
Control group will take daily linagliptin 5mg per oral, not evogliptin 5mg per oral
This group will take daily linagliptin 5mg per oral, not evogliptin
Other Names:
  • Trajenta

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UACR percent change at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Percentage change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) after 24 weeks compared to baseline (%)
Week 24

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
UACR change at Week 24 (%)
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) after 24 weeks compared to baseline (%)
Week 24
UACR change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio (UACR) after 12 weeks compared to baseline (mg/g
Week 12
HbA1c change at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in glycated hemoglobin after 24 weeks compared to baseline
Week 24
HbA1c change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in glycated hemoglobin after 12 weeks compared to baseline
Week 12
HbA1c less than 6.5% at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
proportion of parcipitants having glycated hemoglobin less than 6.5% after 24 weeks
Week 24
HbA1c less than 6.5% at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
proportion of participants having glycated hemoglobin less than 6.5% after 12 weeks
Week 12
HbA1c less than 7.0% at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
proportion of participants having glycated hemoglobin less than 7.0% after 24weeks
Week 24
HbA1c less than 7.0% at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
proportion of participants having glycated hemoglobin less than 7.0% after 12 weeks
Week 12
NAG (N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) change at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in NAG (N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) after 24 weeks compared to baseline (U/L)
Week 24
NAG (N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in NAG (N-acetyl-β-D-glucosaminidase) after 12 weeks compared to baseline (U/L)
Week 12
Cystatin-C change at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in urinary Cystatin-C after 24 weeks compared to baseline (mg/L)
Week 24
Cystatin-C change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in urinary Cystatin-C after 12 weeks compared to baseline (mg/L)
Week 12
Nephrin change at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in Nephrin after 24 weeks compared to baseline (ug/g cr)
Week 24
Nephrin change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in Nephrin after 12 weeks compared to baseline (ug/g cr)
Week 12
Glycated albumin change at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in Glycated albumin after 24 weeks compared to baseline (%)
Week 24
Glycated albumin change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in Glycated albumin after 12 weeks compared to baseline (%)
Week 12
eGFR at Week 24
Time Frame: Week 24
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate based on Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method after 24 weeks compared to baseline (mL/min)
Week 24
eGFR change at Week 12
Time Frame: Week 12
Change in estimated glomerular filtration rate based on Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) method after 12 weeks compared to baseline (mL/min)
Week 12

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jae Hyeon Kim, MD PhD, Samsung Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 16, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

May 14, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 20, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 10, 2018

First Posted (Actual)

September 12, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 23, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 19, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Renal Insufficiency

Clinical Trials on Evogliptin

3
Subscribe