Megaprosthetic Implants the Next Generation (MING) (MING)

December 17, 2018 updated by: Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center

A Randomised, Single Blind Study Assessing Radiological Outcomes for Massive Segmental Femoral Replacements Using Either Porous Collar or Porous Collar With HA

This is an interventional randomized controlled trial that will compare patients who underwent segmental hip replacement using mega-implants with either porous collar or porous collar with HA. Patient recruitment will continue for 18 months. Parameters to be investigated are radiographic measures of bone incorporation into the implants, as well as patient functional outcomes. Clinical follow-up will last for 24 months for each patient.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

BACKGROUND The current surgical treatment of bone cancer patients requires usage of massive endoprosthetic bone implants. The incidence of aseptic loosening is a major cause of prosthesis failure in these patients. Exploring ways to reduce such failures would allow extending longevity of massive implants in a relatively young population.

Current published literature stipulates that osteointegration could improve longevity of massive implants. Evidence suggests that usage of osteointegrated hydroxyapatite (HA) coated collar would reduce the incidence of aseptic loosening around the cemented intramedullary stem in distal femoral bone prosthesis.

Our study aims to compare radiological outcome in 2 groups:

  • A porous collar for either distal or proximal femoral replacements
  • A porous collar with hydroxyapatite (HA) for either distal or proximal femoral replacements The porous collar will be manufactured by Adler Ortho using additive layer manufacturing technology.

STUDY OBJECTIVES The study will review the use of massive segmental replacements in the femur, which have a porous collar with and without HA.

Primary objectives:

The primary objective of the study will be to assess radiological outcome by assessing bony growth into the collar.

Secondary objectives The secondary objective will focus on assessing patient reported outcome measures (VAS pain score and other PROMS)

STUDY DESIGN

Patients will be identified in the outpatient setting as suitable for entry into the trial based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria as set out below.

Patients will be randomised into one of the two groups of the study, due to the nature of intervention this will be a single blind study.

Patients will undergo plain radiographs immediately post-operatively, at 6 months post-operatively, 12 months post-operatively and 24 months post-operatively. Standard protocol radiographs of the relevant limb will be taken in the antero-posterior (AP) and medial-lateral (ML) planes (x2 AP and x2 laterals to cover the prosthesis).

At 12 months and 24 months post-operatively patients will receive a CT scan (cover whole prosthesis, extended CT - knee, pelvis), which will be used to image bone growth within the porous collars.

For plain radiographs a scoring system for extra-cortical bone formation will be made according to Coathup et al, 2013. This will be quantified radiologically in four zones (medial and lateral aspects on AP radiographs; anterior and posterior aspects on ML radiographs). Extracortical bone separated from the implant by a clear radiolucent line is not considered in grown and will be scored 0. A score of 1 will represent extracortical bone (>5mm think and >1mm long) in contact with the implant surface in any of the four previously described zones. The maximum score will be 4, denoting extracortical bone growth in all four zones.

Patients identified and consented in clinic for entry into study. Randomisation prior to surgical date. Baseline X-ray and CT done pre-operatively as per current pre-operative guidelines.

Pre-operative bloods and joint aspiration done to definitively rule out infection in revision patients Pre-operative VAS pain score on admission

Joint replacement done - clarify antibiotic prophylaxis with surgeons - induction + extended post-operative antibiotic prophylaxis

Post-operative Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) to assess physical functioning for all patients. TESS repeated at 6, 12 and 24 months to assess progress post-operatively - correlating with radiographical findings.

Surgery related data including theatre time, intra-operative blood loss and intra- and post-operative complications will be recorded for all patients.

Immediate post-operative, 6, 12 and 24 monthly X-rays (x2 AP and x2 laterals to cover the prosthesis); 12 and 24 monthly CT (cover whole prosthesis, extended CT - knee, pelvis) X-rays and CT reported by scores calculated as previously described.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

  • Name: Haggai Schermann, MD, MPH
  • Phone Number: 972 528771014
  • Email: sheralmi@bu.edu

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Bone cancer patients requiring primary or revision femoral segmental replacements (excluding infections) and non-cancer patients requiring revision femoral segment replacement for aseptic loosening (excluding infections)
  • Male or female, aged 18-80 years
  • Participants willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants unwilling or unable to give informed consent for participation in the study
  • Patients undergoing revision due to infection, identified by positive growth from joint aspiration OR elevated pre-operative inflammatory markers OR radiographical evidence of prosthetic joint infection
  • Bone cancer patients presenting with pathological fractures requiring segmental femoral replacement

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
EXPERIMENTAL: porous collar
Patients with neoplasm of femur bone who require segmental bone resection and replasement with a large prosthesis would receive an implant which collar (a circular part that comes into direct contact with the remaining bone) will be porous, to allow for bone ingrowth and stabilization of the implant.
Use of either porous of porous+hydroxyapathite collars.
Other Names:
  • Segmental bone replacement
EXPERIMENTAL: porous collar with hydroxyapathite
Patients with neoplasm of femur bone who require segmental bone resection and replasement with a large prosthesis would receive an implant which collar (a circular part that comes into direct contact with the remaining bone) will be porous and covered with hydroxyapathite particles, to allow for bone ingrowth and stabilization of the implant.
Use of either porous of porous+hydroxyapathite collars.
Other Names:
  • Segmental bone replacement

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bone incorporation
Time Frame: 24 months
Radiographic evidence of bony growth into the collar
24 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Functional outcome - Visual Analogue Pain Scale
Time Frame: 24 months
Reporting of pain levels (from 1 to 10)
24 months
Functional outcome - a physical functioning score
Time Frame: 24 months
Toronto Extremity Salvage Score (TESS) for lower extremity
24 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ANTICIPATED)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Study Completion (ANTICIPATED)

August 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

First Posted (ACTUAL)

December 19, 2018

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

December 19, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 17, 2018

Last Verified

December 1, 2018

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 0619-18-TLV

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

De-identified data will be analyzed, and its summary will be shared with other researchers.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Bone Neoplasm of Hip (Diagnosis)

Clinical Trials on Megaprosthetic Implants the Next Generation (MING)

3
Subscribe