Expanding the UTHealth Medical Legal Partnership to Improve Mental Health for Low-Income Individuals

November 4, 2020 updated by: Winston Liaw, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston
The aim of this study is to test whether participation of low-income patients with health-harming legal needs (HHLNs) in a medical legal partnership (MLP) results in improved mental health, improved quality of life, reduced utilization, and increased resolution of HHLNs.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

160

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77093
        • Jensen Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • low-income individuals (Low-income is defined as earning less than 200% of the Federal Poverty Level)
  • individuals with HHLNs
  • English or Spanish speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • self-identified as being at significant and immediate risk due to HHLNs (e.g., a situation that involves imminent risk to the patient such as domestic violence)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Medical Legal Partnership
With the medical legal partnership, lawyers are embedded in clinics, and lawyers consult with patients who are identified as having health-harming legal needs (HHLNs). This arm will also receive usual care, which includes consultation with a social worker and a community health worker.
With the medical legal partnership, lawyers are embedded in clinics, and lawyers consult with patients who are identified as having health-harming legal needs (HHLNs). This arm will also receive usual care, which includes consultation with a social worker and a community health worker.
Usual care includes consultation with a social worker and a community health worker.
Active Comparator: Usual Care
Usual care includes consultation with a social worker and a community health worker.
Usual care includes consultation with a social worker and a community health worker.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: baseline
The perceived stress scale consists of 10 items, with each item ranging from 0-4, for a total score range of 0-40. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
baseline
Stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
The perceived stress scale consists of 10 items, with each item ranging from 0-4, for a total score range of 0-40. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
3 months
Stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The perceived stress scale consists of 10 items, with each item ranging from 0-4, for a total score range of 0-40. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
6 months
Stress as assessed by the Perceived Stress Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
The perceived stress scale consists of 10 items, with each item ranging from 0-4, for a total score range of 0-40. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
Time Frame: baseline
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale consists of 7 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-21. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
baseline
Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
Time Frame: 3 months
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale consists of 7 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-21. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
3 months
Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale consists of 7 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-21. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
6 months
Anxiety as assessed by the Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale
Time Frame: 12 months
The Generalized Anxiety Disorder scale consists of 7 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-21. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
12 months
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: baseline
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale consists of 20 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-60. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
baseline
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: 3 months
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale consists of 20 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-60. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
3 months
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: 6 months
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale consists of 20 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-60. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
6 months
Depression as assessed by the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale
Time Frame: 12 months
The Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale consists of 20 items, with each item ranging from 0-3, for a total score range of 0-60. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
12 months
Quality of life as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: baseline
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) consists of 29 items, with 28 of the items ranging from 1-5 and 1 item ranging from 0-10, for a total score range of 28-150. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
baseline
Quality of life as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: 3 months
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) consists of 29 items, with 28 of the items ranging from 1-5 and 1 item ranging from 0-10, for a total score range of 28-150. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
3 months
Quality of life as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: 6 months
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) consists of 29 items, with 28 of the items ranging from 1-5 and 1 item ranging from 0-10, for a total score range of 28-150. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
6 months
Quality of life as assessed by the Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS)
Time Frame: 12 months
The Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) consists of 29 items, with 28 of the items ranging from 1-5 and 1 item ranging from 0-10, for a total score range of 28-150. A higher score indicates a worse outcome.
12 months
Number of Urgent Care Visits
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
Number of Urgent Care Visits
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Number of Urgent Care Visits
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Number of Urgent Care Visits
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Number of Emergency Department Visits
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Number of Hospital Visits
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
Number of Hospital Visits
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Number of Hospital Visits
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Number of Hospital Visits
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Percentage of baseline health-harming legal needs that were resolved
Time Frame: baseline
baseline
Percentage of baseline health-harming legal needs that were resolved
Time Frame: 3 months
3 months
Percentage of baseline health-harming legal needs that were resolved
Time Frame: 6 months
6 months
Percentage of baseline health-harming legal needs that were resolved
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Winston Liaw, MD, MPH, The University of Texas Health Science Center, Houston

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 14, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Study Completion (Actual)

September 11, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 11, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

January 15, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 6, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 4, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • HSC-MS-18-1037

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Health-harming Legal Needs

Clinical Trials on Medical Legal Partnership

Subscribe