A Clinical Trial of Chidamide in the Management of Refractory ITP

August 19, 2025 updated by: Ming Hou, Shandong University

A Prospective, Multicenter Clinical Trial of Chidamide in the Management of Refractory Immune Thrombocytopenia

Primary immune thrombocytopenia (ITP) is an autoimmune bleeding disorder. Increased macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-coated platelet as well as decreased number and/or impaired function of CD4+CD25+Foxp3+ regulatory T (Treg) cells have been shown to participate in the pathogenesis of ITP. Our preclinical data revealed that chidamide, a histone deacetylase inhibitor (HDACi), could attenuate macrophage phagocytosis of antibody-coated platelets, stimulate production of natural Foxp3+ Tregs, and upregulate CTLA4 expression through modulation of histone H3K27 acetylation. The project was undertaking by Qilu Hospital of Shandong University in China. In order to evaluate the efficacy and safety of chidamide at two different dosage regimens in adult patients with refractory ITP.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

In this prospective, open-label, multicenter, randomized clinical trial, refractory ITP adult patients will be enrolled from five medical centers in China. Eligible participants will be randomly assigned 1:1 to receive chidamide at either 2.5 or 5 mg twice per week. The primary endpoint is the overall response at week 12. Complete response was defined as a platelet count at or above 100×10^9/L and an absence of bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count at or above 30×10^9/L but less than 100×10^9/L and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count and an absence of bleeding. No response was defined as a platelet count of less than 30×10^9 cells per L, or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding. The secondary enpoints included 6-month sustained response, time to response (TTR), duration of response, bleeding scores, health-related quality of life assessment and adverse events (AEs). This study will compare the efficacy and safety of chidamide in two different dosage regimens in adult patients with refractory.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

61

Phase

  • Phase 2
  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shandong
      • Jinan, Shandong, China
        • Qilu Hospital, Shandong University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participant must be at least 18 years of age at the time of the screening.
  • Participant may be male or female.
  • Participant has a confirmed diagnosis of ITP according to the 2019 International Working Group assessment for more than 6 months at screening.
  • Participant who didn't respond or relapsed after previous first-line treatment, and lack of response to rituximab, TPO agents, or splenectomy.
  • Bone marrow biopsy is performed in participants over 60 years to exclude hematological malignancies.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant has evidence of a secondary cause of immune thrombocytopenia or to drug treatments or participant has a multiple immune cytopenia, e.g. Evan's syndrome.
  • Participant with the following conditions:severe dysfunction of the heart, kidney, liver, or lung; severe immunodeficiency; malignancy; HIV; hepatitis B or C virus infection; pregnancy or lactation.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: A
Chidamide 2.5 mg po twice per week
In the 2.5 mg group, chidamide will be administered orally at an initial dose of 2.5 mg twice per week for 12 weeks. If an initial response was achieved by week 12, the allocated treatment could continue. Patients in 2.5 mg group were allowed to increase dose to 5 mg if platelet counts were less than 30×10^9 cells per L or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count at week 12 according to investigators' advice and the patients' decision.
Other Names:
  • HBI-8000
In the 5 mg group, chidamide will be administered orally at an initial dose of 5 mg twice per week for 12 weeks. If an initial response was achieved by week 12, the allocated treatment could continue. Patients who did not respond to chidamide at 5 mg for 12 weeks would stop the allocated treatment and were continuously followed up.
Other Names:
  • HBI-8000
Experimental: B
Chidamide 5 mg po twice per week
In the 2.5 mg group, chidamide will be administered orally at an initial dose of 2.5 mg twice per week for 12 weeks. If an initial response was achieved by week 12, the allocated treatment could continue. Patients in 2.5 mg group were allowed to increase dose to 5 mg if platelet counts were less than 30×10^9 cells per L or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count at week 12 according to investigators' advice and the patients' decision.
Other Names:
  • HBI-8000
In the 5 mg group, chidamide will be administered orally at an initial dose of 5 mg twice per week for 12 weeks. If an initial response was achieved by week 12, the allocated treatment could continue. Patients who did not respond to chidamide at 5 mg for 12 weeks would stop the allocated treatment and were continuously followed up.
Other Names:
  • HBI-8000

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Overall response at week 12
Time Frame: week 12
The primary endpoint was the overall response at week 12.Complete response was defined as a platelet count at or above 100×10^9/L and an absence of bleeding. Partial response was defined as a platelet count at or above 30×109/L but less than 100×10^9/L and at least a doubling of the baseline platelet count and an absence of bleeding. No response was defined as a platelet count of less than 30×10^9 cells per L, or less than two-times increase from baseline platelet count, or bleeding.
week 12

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Bleeding scores
Time Frame: 12 months
Bleeding symptoms were graded according a standardized bleeding scale specific to primary immune thrombocytopenia on the basis of site and severity of bleeding by Khellaf et al (PMID: 15951296). A modification was made to exclude age from the original scale so that only bleeding symptoms were described. At each visit, we recorded bleeding scores. Routine visits were scheduled once a week for the first 4 weeks and once a month thereafter. Scores ranged from 0 to 59, with higher values indicating higher bleeding risk.
12 months
Health-related quality of life assessment
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Health-related quality of life was assessed using a self-administered immune thrombocytopenia Patient Assessment Questionnaire (ITP-PAQ) at baseline and at week 12. Scores ranged from 0 to 100, with higher values indicating better quality of life.
12 weeks
Therapy associated adverse events
Time Frame: up to 1 year per subject
The number and frequency of therapy associated adverse events
up to 1 year per subject
Sustained response
Time Frame: 6 months
A response lasting for at least 6 months was defined as a sustained response.
6 months
Time to response
Time Frame: 12 weeks
Time to response was defined as the time from treatment initiation to achieve a complete response or a partial response, whichever came first, assessed up to week 12.
12 weeks
Duration of response
Time Frame: 12 months
Duration of response was defined as the time from achievement of a complete response or a partial response to the loss of response.
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

September 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 27, 2018

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

February 12, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

August 26, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 19, 2025

Last Verified

August 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe