BULLET: Bladder Ultrasound Limits Length (of Time), Expedites Treatment (BULLET)

May 28, 2022 updated by: Stephen Ruffenach, University of Alabama at Birmingham
In this study patients presenting to the pediatric ER with abdominal or pelvic complaints will be randomized to urethral bladder catheter or bladder ultrasound to compare time to completion of successful pelvic ultrasound, as determined by full visualization of uterus and ovaries.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In this study, we will enroll female pediatric emergency department (ED) patients presenting with a diagnosis of abdominal pain who may have a transabdominal pelvic ultrasound ordered by their treating physician (or nurse practitioner). In order to maximize the visualization of organs deep within the pelvis such as the ovaries and uterus, the patient's bladder must be full. The current practice at our institution, as well as numerous others, is to have a bladder catheter placed immediately when a transabdominal pelvic ultrasound is ordered, and then to fill the bladder in a retrograde manner in order to provide enhanced visualization of the pelvic structures. The process of inserting a bladder catheter into a pediatric patient is an invasive procedure which can be traumatic and painful to the patient. Additionally, if the patient's bladder is already full, this procedure may be unnecessary.

In this study, a point-of-care bladder ultrasound will be performed, upon enrollment of a patient by a study bedside sonographer (our pediatric emergency department nurse practitioners), to assess degree of bladder fullness. This measurement will then be repeated serially while the patient is receiving hydration and the ultrasound will be performed when the bladder is full. We hypothesize that this work flow will result in an equivalent time to transabdominal pelvic ultrasound completion and will reduce the number of potentially traumatic and painful, invasive urethral bladder catheterizations.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States, 35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

4 years to 14 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Female

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 8yr-18yrs
  • Female
  • Likely to have order placed for transabdominal pelvic ultrasound/ovarian ultrasound
  • No history of pelvic or bladder reconstructive surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy (known)
  • Critically ill patients
  • Patients with known renal or genitourinary structural abnormalities or prior pelvic/genitourinary surgery
  • Chronic renal disease
  • Patients presenting outside the defined treatment windows

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Bladder Ultrasound
The bladder ultrasound group will undergo point-of-care ultrasound upon enrollment, and bladder ultrasound will be repeated every 30 minutes, unless the patient's bladder is full at time of initial scan.
Bladder fullness will be assessed upon enrollment and if not full, the patient will receive hydration, determined by treating physician, and the bladder ultrasound will be repeated every 30 minutes until the patient states that the bladder is "full," or until bladder is deemed full based on a previously validated bladder fullness qualitative scale, at which point patients in this group will proceed to undergo pelvic ultrasound.
Active Comparator: Standard of Care
Bladder (Urethral) Catheter group. The standard of care group will undergo placement of a urethral bladder catheter to allow retrograde filling of the bladder.
Per institution protocol, patients in the standard of care group will have urethral (bladder) catheter placed immediately after the order for pelvic ultrasound and will undergo retrograde bladder filling as determined by the radiologist/ultrasonographer to the point necessary to fully visualize pelvic structures.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Time to Successful Completion of Pelvic Ultrasound
Time Frame: Baseline to 180 minutes
Time zero (order placed) to time completed (time pelvic ultrasound images are completed)
Baseline to 180 minutes

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pain of Bladder Ultrasound vs. Pain of Bladder Catheter as Measured by Verbal Numerical Rating Scale (VNRS)
Time Frame: When bladder ultrasound performed OR when urinary catheter placed to time of completion of pelvic ultrasound, up to 180 minutes
All participating patients, in either arm, will be given a single-question on pain related to their receipt of bladder ultrasound(s) or bladder catheter. The VNRS uses a 0-10 scale accompanied by faces that pictorially represent the level of pain, 0 being no pain, and 10 being the worst pain. Measurements will start at time when bladder ultrasound(s) are performed OR time when bladder catheter is inserted) to time of completion (time pelvic ultrasound is completed).
When bladder ultrasound performed OR when urinary catheter placed to time of completion of pelvic ultrasound, up to 180 minutes

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Kathleen R Richard, MD, University of Alabama at Birmingham

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 20, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 28, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

March 1, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 1, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 28, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB-300002071

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe