The Influence of Cardiac Rehabilitation on the Health State After ACS (CARDIO-REH)

April 28, 2020 updated by: Damian Skrypnik, Poznan University of Medical Sciences

The Influence of Cardiac Rehabilitation on the Health State of Patients After Acute Coronary Syndrome

Coronary heart disease, including acute coronary syndromes (ACS), is the leading cause of death in European countries. One of the basic elements of secondary and tertiary prevention of ACS is cardiac rehabilitation.

The aims of the study are evaluation of the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on health state- especially on cardiovascular function parameters in patients after acute coronary syndrome and evaluation of the influence of the level of gene expression and polymorphisms of genes associated with ischemic heart disease on the course of cardiac rehabilitation in patients after ACS.

The study will consist of a retrospective and prospective part. The retrospective part will include patients who have had acute coronary syndrome in the past and then - before being included in the study - have undergone cardiac rehabilitation. In the retrospective part, patients enrolled in the study will not undergo cardiac rehabilitation as a part of the study intervention. The prospective part will include patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome in the past and will undergo cardiac rehabilitation as the study intervention.

After being included in the study, patients will undergo medical examination. Then subsequent procedures will be performed: anthropometric measurements; ECG; body composition analysis by bioimpedance; measurement of resting blood pressure, resting heart rate and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin; pulse wave analysis; transthoracic echocardiography of the heart; 24-hour blood pressure measurement by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM); 24-hour ECG recording using the Holter method; electrocardiographic exercise test on a treadmill and / or a six-minute walk test or other exercise test adequate to the patient's state of health; assessment of the quality of the diet; assessment of lifestyle, acceptance of disease and quality of life; assessment of the psychological profile.

Subsequently patients taking part in the prospective part of the study will perform a cardiac rehabilitation program.

After the cardiac rehabilitation program measurement procedures listed above will be repeated.

Before and after the cardiac rehabilitation program blood samples, urine samples and hair samples will be collected. Blood samples, urine samples and hair samples will also be collected from patients taking part in the retrospective part of the study.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Coronary heart disease, including acute coronary syndromes (ACS), is the leading cause of death in European countries, including Poland. In addition, it is one of the main causes of disability and the number of lost years of life and the number of years of life lost in good health. The costs of its treatment include not only the primary prophylaxis of cardiovascular events, the treatment of cardiovascular events, the treatment of chronic conditions and complications such as chronic heart failure or arrhythmia, but also the secondary and tertiary prophylaxis of acute coronary syndromes.

One of the basic elements of secondary and tertiary prevention of ACS is cardiac rehabilitation. It should be implemented as soon as possible after the ACS and be part of a comprehensive, planned and systematic care of the patient after ACS. The beneficial effect of cardiac rehabilitation on the cardiovascular system, lipid and carbohydrate metabolism and physical performance has been demonstrated in a way that does not raise any doubts. However, in the light of the growing epidemic of civilization diseases such as excessive body mass, diabetes, dyslipidemia, hypertension and other cardiometabolic disorders, it is necessary to conduct high-quality research on the development of the most effective cardiac rehabilitation programs, so as to maximize their beneficial effect on patients' health.

The aims of the study are:

  1. Evaluation of the impact of cardiac rehabilitation on selected anthropometric, biochemical, mineral parameters, body composition parameters, physical fitness parameters and cardiovascular function parameters in patients after acute coronary syndrome.
  2. Assessment of lifestyle, acceptance of disease, quality of life, diet and psychological profile and the influence of these factors on the course of cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome.
  3. Evaluation of the influence of the level of gene expression and polymorphisms of genes associated with ischemic heart disease and predisposing conditions (including excessive body weight, hypertension, lipid and carbohydrate disorders, impaired vascular endothelial function) on the course of cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome and searching for new genes that may affect the course of cardiac rehabilitation in this group of patients.

Research hypotheses:

  1. Cardiac rehabilitation has a positive effect on selected anthropometric, biochemical, mineral parameters, body composition parameters, physical fitness parameters and cardiovascular function parameters in patients after acute coronary syndrome.
  2. Lifestyle, acceptance of disease, quality of life, diet and psychological profile have a significant impact on the course of cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome.
  3. The level of expression and gene polymorphism of genes associated with ischemic heart disease and predisposing conditions (including excessive body weight, hypertension, lipid and carbohydrate disorders, impaired vascular endothelial function) have a significant impact on the course of cardiac rehabilitation in patients after acute coronary syndrome.

The study will consist of a retrospective and prospective part. The retrospective part will include patients who have had acute coronary syndrome in the past and then - before being included in the study - have undergone cardiac rehabilitation. In the retrospective part, patients enrolled in the study will not undergo cardiac rehabilitation as a part of the study intervention. In contrast, the prospective part will include patients who have had an acute coronary syndrome in the past and will undergo cardiac rehabilitation as the study intervention.

About 200 women and men aged 18 to 99 are planned to be included in the study.

After being included in the study, patients will undergo medical examination and their medical documentation will be collected, analyzed, copied and archived. Then subsequent procedures will be performed:

  • anthropometric measurements (body weight, height, hip, waist, neck circumference measurement)
  • ECG - electrocardiography
  • non-invasive analysis of the body composition by bioimpedance
  • non-invasive measurement of resting blood pressure, resting heart rate and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin
  • non-invasive pulse wave analysis
  • non-invasive transthoracic echocardiography of the heart
  • non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure measurement by ABPM
  • non-invasive 24-hour ECG recording using the Holter method
  • non-invasive electrocardiographic exercise test on a treadmill and / or a six-minute walk test or other exercise test adequate to the patient's state of health; these tests will always be preceded by a detailed medical qualification
  • assessment of the quality of the diet
  • assessment of lifestyle, acceptance of disease and quality of life
  • assessment of the psychological profile

Subsequently patients taking part in the prospective part of the study will perform a cardiac rehabilitation program.

After the cardiac rehabilitation program measurement procedures listed above (anthropometric measurements; ECG; non-invasive analysis of the body composition by bioimpedance; non-invasive measurement of resting blood pressure, resting heart rate and oxygen saturation of hemoglobin; non-invasive pulse wave analysis; non-invasive transthoracic echocardiography of the heart; non-invasive 24-hour blood pressure measurement by ABPM; non-invasive 24-hour ECG recording using the Holter method; non-invasive electrocardiographic exercise test; assessment of the quality of the diet; assessment of lifestyle, acceptance of disease and quality of life; assessment of the psychological profile) will be repeated.

Before and after the cardiac rehabilitation program blood samples, urine samples and hair samples will be collected. Blood samples, urine samples and hair samples will also be collected from patients taking part in the retrospective part of the study.

After data collection statistical analyses will be performed.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Wielkopolska
      • Poznan, Wielkopolska, Poland, 60-569
        • Recruiting
        • Department of Treatment of Obesity, Metabolic Disorders and Clinical Dietetics, Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent in writing
  • Coronary heart disease, a state after an acute coronary syndrome
  • Female or male
  • Age 18 - 99 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Active neoplastic disease
  • Alcohol abuse, drug abuse
  • Pregnancy, lactation
  • Other conditions that in the opinion of researchers may pose any risk to the patient during the study.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Patients after ACS
Patients after acute coronary syndrome undergoing cardiac rehabilitation.
The training program of cardiac rehabilitation, depending on the results of the patient's medical qualification, will consist of the following: free active exercises, isometric exercises, active exercises in relief with resistance, isotonic exercises, isokinetic exercises, active breathing exercises, active breathing exercises with resistance, balance exercises, general exercises- individual and in groups, interval training on a treadmill or cycling cycloergometer, continuous training on a treadmill or cycling cycloergometer, circuit training, walking training, march training with accessories, autogenic training, walking. The training program will last an average 2 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pulse wave velocity (PWV) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Pulse wave velocity I
At baseline
PWV II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Pulse wave velocity II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Aortic pressure (AP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Aortic pressure I
At baseline
AP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Aortic pressure II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Body mass (BM) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Body mass I
At baseline
BM II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Body mass II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Body height (BH) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Body height I
At baseline
BH II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Body height II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Body mass index (BMI) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Body mass index I
At baseline
BMI II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Body mass index II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Waist circumference (WC) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Waist circumference I
At baseline
WC II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Waist circumference II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Hip circumference (HC) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Hip circumference I
At baseline
HC II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Hip circumference II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Neck circumference (NC) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Neck circumference I
At baseline
NC II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Neck circumference II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Total fat percentage (TF%) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Total fat percentage I
At baseline
TF% II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Total fat percentage II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Systolic blood pressure (SBP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Systolic blood pressure I
At baseline
SBP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Systolic blood pressure II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Diastolic blood pressure (DBP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Diastolic blood pressure I
At baseline
DBP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Diastolic blood pressure II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Heart rate (HR) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Heart rate I
At baseline
HR II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Heart rate II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood oxygen saturation (SO2) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood oxygen saturation I
At baseline
SO2 II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood oxygen saturation II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Ejection fraction (EF) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Ejection fraction I
At baseline
EF II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Ejection fraction II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring- systolic blood pressure (ABPM SBP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring- systolic blood pressure I
At baseline
ABPM SBP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring- systolic blood pressure II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring- diastolic blood pressure (ABPM DBP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring- diastolic blood pressure I
At baseline
ABPM DBP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Ambulatory blood pressure monitoring- diastolic blood pressure II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Metabolic equivalent (MET) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Metabolic equivalent I
At baseline
MET II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Metabolic equivalent II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Distance in 6-minutes walk (6MW-D) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Distance in 6-minutes walk I
At baseline
6MW-D II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Distance in 6-minutes walk II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
aspartate aminotransferase (AST) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of aspartate aminotransferase I
At baseline
AST II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of aspartate aminotransferase II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
alanine aminotransferase (ALT) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of alanine aminotransferase I
At baseline
ALT II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of alanine aminotransferase II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
total bilirubin (TB) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of total bilirubin I
At baseline
TB II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of total bilirubin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
indirect bilirubin (IB) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of indirect bilirubin I
At baseline
IB II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of indirect bilirubin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
direct bilirubin (DB) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of direct bilirubin I
At baseline
DB II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of direct bilirubin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
gamma-glutamyltransferase (GGTP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of gamma-glutamyltransferase I
At baseline
GGTP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of gamma-glutamyltransferase II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
total cholesterol (TCH) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of total cholesterol I
At baseline
TCH II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of total cholesterol II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
low density lipoprotein (LDL) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of low density lipoprotein I
At baseline
LDL II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of low density lipoprotein II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
high density lipoprotein (HDL) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of high density lipoprotein I
At baseline
HDL II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of high density lipoprotein II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
triglycerides (TG) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of triglycerides I
At baseline
TG II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of triglycerides II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
apolipoprotein A (ApoA) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of apolipoprotein A I
At baseline
ApoA II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of apolipoprotein A II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
insulin (INS) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of insulin I
At baseline
INS II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of insulin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
glucose (GLU) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of glucose I
At baseline
GLU II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of glucose II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
creatinine (CREA) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of creatinine I
At baseline
CREA II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of creatinine II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
C-reactive protein (CRP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of C-reactive protein I
At baseline
CRP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of C-reactive protein II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
adropin (ADR) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of adropin I
At baseline
ADR II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of adropin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
neopterin (NEOPT) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of neopterin I
At baseline
NEOPT II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of neopterin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
N-terminal natriuretic propeptide type B (NTpro-BNP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of N-terminal natriuretic propeptide type B I
At baseline
NTpro-BNP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of N-terminal natriuretic propeptide type B II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
magnesium (Mg) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of magnesium I
At baseline
Mg II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of magnesium II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
homocysteine (Hcy) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of homocysteine I
At baseline
Hcy II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of homocysteine II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
troponin (TROP) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of troponin I
At baseline
TROP II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of troponin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
interleukin 6 (IL6) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of interleukin 6 I
At baseline
IL6 II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of interleukin 6 II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
tumor necrosis factor (TNF) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of tumor necrosis factor I
At baseline
TNF II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of tumor necrosis factor II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor I
At baseline
VEGF II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of vascular endothelial growth factor II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
leptin (LPT) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Blood concentration of leptin I
At baseline
LPT II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Blood concentration of leptin II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
VEGF polymorphism
Time Frame: At baseline
Polymorphism of the VEGF gene
At baseline
Urine concentration of magnesium (U-Mg) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Urine concentration of magnesium I
At baseline
U-Mg II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Urine concentration of magnesium II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Hair content of magnesium (H-Mg) I
Time Frame: At baseline
Hair content of magnesium I
At baseline
H-Mg II
Time Frame: After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline
Hair content of magnesium II
After intervention completion- an average of 2 weeks from baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Damian Skrypnik, MD; PhD, Poznan University of Medical Sciences

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 12, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 31, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 2, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 29, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 28, 2020

Last Verified

April 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

IPD Plan Description

The decision of individual participant data (IPD) sharing may be changed in the future.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe