Nurse-Driven Telephone Intervention in Improving Side Effects in Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy

December 23, 2019 updated by: M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Evaluating the Feasibility of a Nurse-Driven Telephone Triage Intervention for Cancer Patients Undergoing Chemotherapy in the Ambulatory Setting

This clinical trial studies how well a nurse-driven telephone intervention improves side effects in patients with cancer who are undergoing chemotherapy. Receiving calls from a nurse at home while receiving chemotherapy may improve the management of side effects and overall care in cancer patients.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore the feasibility of a proactive nurse-driven telephone triage intervention for patients with cancer receiving first-line chemotherapy in the ambulatory setting.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To explore the symptom experience of patients receiving a nurse-driven telephone triage intervention while receiving chemotherapy in the ambulatory setting.

II. To explore the satisfaction of patients receiving a nurse-driven telephone triage intervention while receiving chemotherapy in the ambulatory setting.

III. To explore the frequency of emergency room visits and hospital admissions for symptom management by patients receiving a nurse-driven telephone triage intervention while receiving chemotherapy in the ambulatory setting.

OUTLINE:

During standard of care chemotherapy, patients receive up to 18 telephone calls from a nurse using a standardized triage call script over 20 minutes.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

90

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Texas
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
        • M D Anderson Cancer Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • English speaking
  • Newly diagnosed patients with a breast, sarcoma, or head and neck cancer diagnosis preparing to undergo first-line, standard of care chemotherapy (patients with head and neck cancer may be undergoing concurrent first-line chemotherapy and radiation treatment)
  • All chemotherapy treatment to be completed at the study institution

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have received previous chemotherapy treatment for cancer
  • Patients who will be receiving chemotherapy on research protocols
  • Pregnant patients, as they may be on unique treatment protocols outside standard of care or have symptom needs that are beyond the scope of this intervention
  • Patients who are unable to verbalize (e.g. due to tracheostomy)

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Supportive Care (telephone intervention)
During standard of care chemotherapy, patients receive up to 18 telephone calls from a nurse using a standardized triage call script over 20 minutes.
Ancillary studies
Receive telephone calls
Complete survey
Other Names:
  • Survey Instrument

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Feasibility of completing nurse-driven telephone triage calls
Time Frame: Up to 25 weeks
Completion is defined as the patient answering the call and completing the assessment; the target completion rate is set as 70%. Completion of nurse-driven calls will be assessed separately by center (breast, sarcoma, head and neck) and globally across all centers. The study will declare the intervention to be feasible within a center if the 90% confidence interval for completion rate is completely above 70% or contains 70%. To calculate the confidence interval, the study will construct a generalized linear mixed model with only a term for intercept.
Up to 25 weeks

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Symptom experience
Time Frame: Up to 25 weeks
Will be measured using the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory (MDASI). This information will be summarized using graphical methods including box-plots and histograms, as well as summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals. The MDASI will be assessed by center and time point, as well as by time point across all centers.
Up to 25 weeks
Patient Satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 25 weeks
This information will be summarized using graphical methods including box-plots and histograms, as well as summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals. Satisfaction will be assessed by treatment group and by time point, as appropriate. They will also be assessed by center and again across all centers.
Up to 25 weeks
Number of emergency room visits
Time Frame: Up to 25 weeks
This information will be summarized using graphical methods including box-plots and histograms, as well as summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals. Number of emergency room visits will be assessed by treatment group and by time point, as appropriate. They will also be assessed by center and again across all centers.
Up to 25 weeks
Number of hospital admissions
Time Frame: Up to 25 weeks
This information will be summarized using graphical methods including box-plots and histograms, as well as summary statistics and 90% confidence intervals. Number of hospital admissions will be assessed by treatment group and by time point, as appropriate. They will also be assessed by center and again across all centers.
Up to 25 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Colleen Jernigan, M.D. Anderson Cancer Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 17, 2016

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2019

Study Completion (Actual)

December 18, 2019

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 23, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

May 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 24, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 23, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2016-0300 (Other Identifier: M D Anderson Cancer Center)
  • P30CA016672 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
  • NCI-2019-02651 (Registry Identifier: CTRP (Clinical Trial Reporting Program))

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sarcoma

Clinical Trials on Survey Administration

Subscribe