A Dissonance-Based Obesity Intervention

June 2, 2022 updated by: Sylvia Herbozo, University of Illinois at Chicago

Enhanced Project Health: A Dissonance-Based Intervention for Obesity in Young Adults

This project will examine the feasibility and acceptability of Enhanced Project Health, a dissonance-based obesity intervention, and whether this intervention results in significantly greater reductions in weight and improvements in lifestyle behaviors than an assessment only condition. Participants will be young adults enrolled in college.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Approximately 34% of college students are overweight/obese. However, few behavioral weight loss (BWL) interventions have been developed for young adults in college. Research suggests that standard BWL interventions are not addressing the needs of young adults as they have shown poorer retention rates and weight loss compared to older adults in BWL trials. Standard BWL interventions are also time-intensive and are not conducive to inexpensive dissemination.

The primary aim of this project is to examine the feasibility and acceptability of Enhanced Project Health, a dissonance-based obesity intervention for young adults enrolled in college. Enhanced Project Health is based on Project Health, a dissonance-based obesity prevention program, which has been shown to significantly decrease weight gain and future overweight/obesity onset compared to a matched intervention and minimal intervention control condition in young adults. The current intervention was expanded to consist of eight weekly group sessions and to address sleep, in addition to diet and physical activity. The secondary aim is to test the hypothesis that Enhanced Project Health will result in significantly greater reductions in weight and improvements in lifestyle behaviors compared to an assessment only condition.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

7

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 606012
        • Neuropsychiatric Institute, University of Illinoist at Chicago

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 25 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Young adults of ages 18 to 25.
  2. Enrolled as a college student.
  3. Body mass index of 25 or more (overweight/obese) based on measured height and weight.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Diagnosis of bulimia nervosa according to DSM-5 criteria.
  2. Diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea.
  3. Participation in interventions for weight loss or disordered eating behaviors.
  4. Current use of prescription drugs for weight loss or disordered eating behaviors.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Dissonance-based obesity intervention
Participants in this arm will receive Enhanced Project Health.
A dissonance-based obesity intervention consisting of eight weekly groups sessions (1.5 hours).
No Intervention: Assessment Only
Participants in this arm will only complete the baseline assessment and 2 month assessment. They will not receive Enhanced Project Health.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of eligible young adults that agree to participate in the study
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
This will be defined as a percentage of young adults that agree to participate in study out of the young adults screened for the study.
Up to 1 month
Time for recruitment
Time Frame: Up to 1 month
This will be defined as time (weeks and days) from initial contact with research staff to randomization into the study.
Up to 1 month
Attendance rate of participants
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 months
This will be defined as the percentage of participants attending 75% of the group sessions.
Assessed at 2 months
Retention rate of participants
Time Frame: Assessed at 2 months
This will be defined as the percentage of participants remaining in the study at the post-intervention assessment.
Assessed at 2 months
Program Evaluation Questionnaire - Each Group Session
Time Frame: Assessed from week 1 to week 8

This questionnaire was developed for this study. It will assess the acceptability of the intervention and will be administered at the end of each group session. Participants will be asked to rate the usefulness of the session on one item with a scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 1 to 5. Higher scores indicate more usefulness.

Participants will also be asked to respond to open-ended questions about each group session. These questions will assess the most favorable aspects, least favorable aspects, and areas of improvements. Responses will be coded using a variation of the long table approach emphasizing frequency, specificity, emotion, and extensiveness. Codes will be examined to identify themes.

Assessed from week 1 to week 8
Program Evaluation Questionnaire - Overall Program
Time Frame: Assessed at week 8
This questionnaire was developed for this study. It will assess the program with regard to effectiveness and satisfaction as well as characteristics of the group leaders (clarity, knowledge, experience, respect) using a scale ranging from 1 to 5. Total scores range from 8 to 40. Higher scores indicate more favorable responses. This questionnaire will be administered at the end of the last group session.
Assessed at week 8

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Body Mass Index (kg/m^2)
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 months
Body Mass Index will be calculated using measured weight and height (kg/m^2)
Baseline to 2 months
International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form (IPAQ-S)
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 months
The International Physical Activity Questionnaire-Short Form will assess walking, moderate-intensity activity, and vigorous-intensity activity. The scores for each type of physical activity are converted to MET-minutes/week as defined by the following: Walking MET-minutes/week = 3.3 * walking minutes * walking days; Moderate MET-minutes/week = 4.0 * moderate-intensity activity minutes * moderate days; Vigorous MET-minutes/week = 8.0 * vigorous-intensity activity minutes * vigorous-intensity days; Total physical activity MET-minutes/week = sum of Walking + Moderate + Vigorous MET-minutes/week scores. The total score will be computed by summing the duration (in minutes) and frequency (days) of each activity. Higher duration and frequency indicate more engagement in physical activity. The pattern of physical activity can also be classified as low, moderate, or high based on the total score.
Baseline to 2 months
Actigraph GT3XP-BTLE
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 months
An accelerometer will record physical activity for a 1 week period
Baseline to 2 months
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Baseline to 2 months
The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index will assess the quality and patterns of sleep using a scale ranging from 0 to 3. Total scores range from 8 to 57. Higher scores indicate greater sleep disturbances.
Baseline to 2 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sylvia Herbozo, Ph.D., University of Illinois at Chicago

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 18, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

August 28, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 2, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 2019-0892

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Obesity

Clinical Trials on Enhanced Project Health

Subscribe