Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spina Plane Block

September 18, 2019 updated by: ILKE KUPELI, Erzincan University

Ultrasound Guided Transversus Abdominis Plane Block Versus Erector Spina Plane Block in Pediatric Lower Abdominal Surgery

Regional anesthesia and analgesia techniques are frequently used to provide pain control in pediatric surgical applications. The main advantages of these techniques include ease of application, good analgesic efficacy and low risk of complications (1). It reduces the need for parenteral opioids and increases the quality of postoperative pain control and the satisfaction of the patient and family (2). The aim of this study was to compare the contribution of TAP block and ESP block combined with sedation in pediatric surgery to anesthesia and analgesia during surgery without general anesthesia.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

100

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Erzincan, Turkey, 24100
        • Erzincan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

2 years to 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • ASA I-II,
  • undergo elective lower abdominal surgery
  • 2-6 years

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Psychiatric patients,
  • weight> 40 kg,
  • those with cardiac-pulmonary-neurological disease,
  • those with bleeding disorders,
  • infection or wound scarring at the injection site,
  • known allergy to local anesthetics

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: transversus abdominis plane block
Group 1 (n: 50): those who underwent TAP block after induction of propofol atropine and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance
Device: Ultrasound guided erector spinae block
Group 2 (n: 50): those who underwent ESP block after propofol atropine induction and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance
Active Comparator: erector spinae block
Group 2 (n: 50): those who underwent ESP block after propofol atropine induction and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance
Device: Ultrasound guided erector spinae block
Group 2 (n: 50): those who underwent ESP block after propofol atropine induction and maintained with only 1 mg / kg / h propofol in anesthesia maintenance

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Visual analogue scale
Time Frame: 4 months
effectiveness of erector spinae block on intraoperative anesthesia
4 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Erzincan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2019

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 6, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 18, 2019

Last Verified

September 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • EBYU ESP

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Intraoperative Pain Control

Clinical Trials on Ultrasound guided erector spinae block

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Montenegro

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe