taVNS in Mild to Moderate Parkinson's Disease (taVNS)

January 5, 2023 updated by: Vanessa Hinson, Medical University of South Carolina

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation (taVNS) in Mild to Moderate Parkinson's Disease

The purpose of this study is to find out whether a non-invasive form of nerve stimulation called transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is safe and effective in people with Parkinson's Disease.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

33

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • South Carolina
      • Charleston, South Carolina, United States, 29425
        • Medical University of South Carolina

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 79 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: 40-79 y
  • Idiopathic Parkinson's Disease Diagnosis
  • Disease Stage: Hoehn and Yahr stage 2-3
  • Patient requires a minimum of 3 doses of levodopa daily
  • Willingness to be videotaped

Exclusion criteria:

  • Dementia or Montreal Cognitive Assessment score <24
  • Parkinson's Disease psychosis
  • Ear trauma
  • Facial pain
  • Traumatic Brain Injury or clinical history of stroke
  • Metal implants above the shoulders
  • History of myocardial infarction or arrhythmia, bradycardia
  • Active respiratory disorder
  • Alcohol or substance use disorders
  • History of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS) or other brain surgery
  • Epilepsy
  • Pregnancy
  • B-Blockers, dopamine blocking agent, antiarrhythmic medication, acetylcholine esterase inhibitor, midodrine, florinef, droxidopa, or anticholinergic drugs

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Sham Comparator: Sham Stimulation
Sham stimulation involves identical perceptual threshold finding and stimulation parameters as active stimulation, with the exception of stimulation target. Sham stimulation will be delivered to the left earlobe, a target believed to have little to no vagal nerve innervation.
Active Comparator: Active taVNS
Patients will be masked to transcutaneous stimulation of the auricular branch of the vagus nerve at the tragus

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Motor Function Score as Assessed by Modified Movement Disorder Society Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (MDS-UPDRS) Part III
Time Frame: Baseline (Visit 1) to Day 14 (Visit 10)

The MDS-UPDRS is a rating scale used in research and clinic to rate the severity of Parkinson's Disease. A low score indicates mild disease and a high score more advanced disease. The possible range for MDS-UPDRS Part III is 0-132. Higher scores reflect greater motor disturbance. A decline in score from pre-post would indicate improvement. This outcome observed Part III of UPDRS motor examination.

Information on cover page:

The MDS-UPDRS has four parts: Part I (non-motor experiences of daily living), Part II (motor experiences of daily living), Part III (motor examination) and Part IV (motor complications). Part I has two components: IA concerns a number of behaviors that are assessed by the investigator with all pertinent information from patients and caregivers, and IB is completed by the patient with or without the aid of the caregiver, but independently of the investigator. These sections can, however, be reviewed by the rater to ensure that all questions are answered clea

Baseline (Visit 1) to Day 14 (Visit 10)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Cognitive Function Score
Time Frame: Screening to Day 13 (Visit 9)
Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System (DKEFS) letter fluency is an investigator administered test that assesses verbal fluency. Higher scores indicate more correct responses. A positive value of change means an improvement in fluency. A decrease in score represents decrease in fluency. The minimum score is 0 and there is no maximum score. The raw score is total from letters F, A, and S.
Screening to Day 13 (Visit 9)
Change in Cognitive Function Score
Time Frame: Screening to Day 13 (Visit 9)
DKEFS category fluency is an investigator administered test checking into ability to switch between categories presented. There is no upper limit on the D-KEFS measures. There is no lower limit on the D-KEPS measure. Higher scores reflect better verbal fluency. An increase in score from pre-post would indicate improvement. Decrease in value represents decrease in fluency. Raw score is total of Animals + Boys Names.
Screening to Day 13 (Visit 9)
Change in Cognitive Function Score
Time Frame: Screening to Day 13 (Visit 9)
Digit span forward is an investigator administered test looking at attention. The possible range for Digit Span Forward is 0-16, same for Digit Span Backward. Higher scores reflect better focused attention and working memory. An increase in score from pre-post would indicate improvement.
Screening to Day 13 (Visit 9)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Vanessa Hinson, MD, PhD, Medical University of South Carolina

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 20, 2018

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

June 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 9, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 7, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

November 8, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 5, 2023

Last Verified

January 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Parkinson Disease

Clinical Trials on Active taVNS

3
Subscribe