Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Multiple Ocular Fundus Diseases Using Retinal Images

December 24, 2019 updated by: Haotian Lin, Sun Yat-sen University

Development and Validation of a Deep Learning System for Multiple Ocular Fundus Diseases Using Retinal Images: a Multi-center Prospective Study

Retinal images can reflect both fundus and systemic conditions (diabetes and cardiovascular disease) and firstly to be used for medical artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm training due to its advantages of clinical significance and easy to obtain. Here, the investigators developed a single network model that can mine the characteristics among multiple fundus diseases, which was trained by plenty of fundus images with one or several disease labels (if they have) in each of them. The model performance was compared with those of both native and international ophthalmologists. The model was further tested by datasets with different camera types and validated by three external datasets prospectively collected from the clinical sites where the model would be applied.

Study Overview

Status

Unknown

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

300000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Guangdong
      • Guangzhou, Guangdong, China, 510060
        • Recruiting
        • Zhongshan Ophthalmic Center, Sun Yat-sen Univerisity
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Haotian Lin, Ph.D

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Retinal images were collected from different health care institutes all over China and other countries around the world.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The quality of fundus images should clinical acceptable. More than 80% of the fundus image area including four main regions (optic disk, macular, upper and lower retinal vessel archs) are easy to read and discriminate.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Images with light leakage (>30% of area), spots from lens flares or stains, and overexposure were excluded from further analysis.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Other

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Training dataset
Retinal images collected from hospitals and multiple screening sites all over China
Validation dataset
Retinal images separated from training dataset
Training dataset was used to train the deep learning model, which was validated and tested by other two datasets.
Testing dataset
Retinal images prospectively collected from the hospitals and ocular disease screening sites totally different from training dataset
Training dataset was used to train the deep learning model, which was validated and tested by other two datasets.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the deep learning system
Time Frame: baseline
The investigators will calculate the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of deep learning system and compare this index between deep learning system and human doctors.
baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sensitivity of the deep learning system
Time Frame: baseline
The investigators will calculate the sensitivity of deep learning system and compare this index between deep learning system and human doctors.
baseline
Specificity of the deep learning system
Time Frame: baseline
The investigators will calculate the specificity of deep learning system and compare this index between deep learning system and human doctors.
baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2014

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

February 1, 2020

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2020

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2019

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2019

First Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 30, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 24, 2019

Last Verified

December 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CCPMOH2019- China8

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Ophthalmological Disorder

Clinical Trials on diagnostic

Subscribe