- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04216173
Acupuncture for Headache Post-Traumatic Brain Injury: A Feasibility Study
September 17, 2021 updated by: Mark Sodders, University of Washington
This study evaluates and addresses challenges to implementing an acupuncture intervention for adults who have headaches after sustaining a moderate traumatic brain injury.
Eligible participants will be recruited from Seattle and the surrounding areas to receive weekly acupuncture for 12 consecutive weeks.
Participants will complete questionnaires to assess headache impact, depression, health-related quality of life, and cognitive function at the beginning of the study and every two weeks for the duration of the study.
Participants will participate in structured interviews after the study for their views on the acceptability and tolerability of the study protocol.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
2
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Washington
-
Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
- Harborview Injury Prevention and Research Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years and older (ADULT, OLDER_ADULT)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria
- Has a history of moderate traumatic brain injury (TBI) one to five years previously
- Currently under medical supervision for post-traumatic headache
- Have a score ≥ 3 on the Patient Health Questionnaire 2
- Have a raw summed score ≤ 6 on the PROMIS Cognitive Function Short Form v2.0 - Abilities 2a (part of PROMIS-29+2 Profile)
- Community-dwelling
- 18 years of age and older
- English Speaking
- Able to provide voluntarily consent
Exclusion Criteria
- History of multiple TBIs
- History of receiving acupuncture treatment in the past six months for the primary condition of headache
- An established diagnosis of PTSD
- Psychosis or agitation
- Other neurodegenerative disorders
- Other medical/surgical condition that precludes travel to participate in the intervention over the study duration
- Has an active skin lesion or acute trauma over or around the proposed acupuncture points
- History of trauma to the head that currently prevents the use of acupuncture points along the midline of the scalp
- Persons who are pregnant
- Unable to provide informed consent for the research as identified as answering more than two incorrect responses on the Six-item Screener
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: OTHER
- Allocation: NA
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: NONE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
---|---|
EXPERIMENTAL: Acupuncture
|
Acupuncture weekly for 12 consecutive weeks.
Acupuncture protocol consists of both scalp and body acupuncture points.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Proportion of weekly acupuncture sessions completed over 12 consecutive weeks
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Retention rate will be evaluated by the proportion of weekly acupuncture sessions completed per participant over the course of 12 consecutive weeks.
|
12 weeks
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
Baseline
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
2 weeks
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
4 weeks
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
6 weeks
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
8 weeks
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
10 weeks
|
Proportion of survey questionnaires completed
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Respondent burden will be evaluated by the proportion of survey questionnaires completed.
|
12 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
Baseline
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: 2 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
2 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: 4 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
4 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: 6 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
6 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: 8 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
8 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: 10 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
10 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires
Time Frame: 12 weeks
|
Data completeness in survey questionnaires will be evaluated during data collection.
|
12 weeks
|
Participants' perceptions of feasibility of the study with structured interviews
Time Frame: After 12 weeks, or within two weeks of withdrawal from the study
|
After 12 weeks in the study, participants will participate in structured interviews for their views on the acceptability and tolerability of the study protocol and acupuncture protocol, recommendations for recruitment and retention, and experiences during the intervention.
Interviews with participants withdrawn from the study will be attempted within two weeks of the withdrawal.
|
After 12 weeks, or within two weeks of withdrawal from the study
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
---|---|---|
Headache Impact Test - 6
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
A brief measure describing how a headache affects a participant's functional health and well-being.
Score ranges from 36 to 78.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
A measure of depression severity.
Scores may range from zero to 27.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) Short Form v1.0 - Depression 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of depression collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Anxiety 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of anxiety, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Physical Function 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of physical function, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Pain Interference 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of pain interference, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Fatigue 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of fatigue, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Sleep Disturbance 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of sleep disturbance, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v1.0 - Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of one's ability to participate in social roles and other activities, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Pain Intensity Item (Global07)
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of pain intensity, collected as a part of the PROMIS-29 v2.1 profile.
This is a single question, with a possible score of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
PROMIS Short Form v2.0 - Cognitive Function 4a
Time Frame: Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Participant reported measure of cognitive function.
There are four questions, with a possible score of four to 20.
Lower scores indicate worse outcomes.
|
Baseline, 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks, 10 weeks, 12 weeks
|
Self-reported changes in medication dose
Time Frame: Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Changes in medication
|
Baseline, 12 weeks
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mark D Sodders, DOAM, University of Washington
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
February 6, 2020
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
March 12, 2020
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
March 12, 2020
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
December 14, 2019
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
December 31, 2019
First Posted (ACTUAL)
January 2, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
September 24, 2021
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 17, 2021
Last Verified
September 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- STUDY00008281
- KL2TR002317-03S1 (NIH)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Traumatic Brain Injury
-
Fondazione per la Ricerca Ospedale MaggioreCompletedBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateItaly
-
Toronto Rehabilitation InstituteCentre for Aging and Brain Health Innovation; Ontario Neurotrauma FoundationUnknownBrain Injuries, Traumatic | Brain Injury, Chronic | Brain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic ModerateCanada
-
Hospital Sirio-LibanesUniversity of Sao Paulo; Ministry of Health, Brazil; Hospital Sao Rafael; PROAD... and other collaboratorsRecruitingBrain Injury Traumatic Severe | Brain Injury Traumatic Moderate | Post Traumatic EpilepsyBrazil
-
University of TurkuTurku University Hospital; The Finnish Funding Agency for Technology and Innovation... and other collaboratorsCompletedBrain Injuries | TBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Brain Injuries, Traumatic | Traumatic Brain Injury | Injury, Brain, TraumaticFinland
-
Children's Hospital Medical Center, CincinnatiUniversity of CincinnatiCompletedBrain Injury Traumatic MildUnited States
-
BrainScope Company, Inc.RecruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury) | Concussion, Brain | MTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Closed Head InjuryUnited States
-
Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche...Institut National de Recherche en Informatique et en AutomatiqueNot yet recruitingTBI (Traumatic Brain Injury)France
-
University of Sao Paulo General HospitalUnknownTraumatic Brain Injury | Severe Brain Injury | Closed Traumatic Brain InjuryBrazil
-
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityXijing Hospital; Second Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University; Central... and other collaboratorsRecruitingMTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain Injury | Moderate Traumatic Brain InjuryChina
-
First Affiliated Hospital Xi'an Jiaotong UniversityHealth Science Center of Xi'an Jiaotong University; The Second Affiliated Hospital...RecruitingMTBI - Mild Traumatic Brain InjuryChina
Clinical Trials on Acupuncture
-
Federal University of São PauloCompleted
-
University of ZurichCharite University, Berlin, Germany; First Teaching Hospital of Tianjin University...CompletedExperimental Dental PainSwitzerland
-
University of SkövdeCompleted
-
National Research Centre of Complementary and Alternative...Norwegian Acupuncture CollegeUnknown
-
Chengdu University of Traditional Chinese MedicineChongqing Medical University; Hunan University of Traditional Chinese MedicineCompletedFunctional Dyspepsia | Postprandial Distress SyndromeChina
-
University of MichiganMassachusetts General Hospital; National Center for Complementary and Integrative...Completed
-
Chang Gung Memorial HospitalRecruitingIntracranial HemorrhagesTaiwan
-
University Medicine GreifswaldRecruitingGagging During Transesophageal EchocardiographyGermany
-
Huazhong University of Science and TechnologyThe University of Hong Kong; Heilongjiang University of Chinese Medicine; Hubei...CompletedPolycystic Ovary SyndromeChina
-
China Medical University HospitalNot yet recruiting