Antibioprophylaxis for Excision-graft Surgery in Burn Patient (A2B-TRIAL) (A2B)

November 19, 2025 updated by: Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

"Antibioprophylaxis for Excision-graft Surgery in Burn Patient: a Multicenter Randomized Double-blind Study: A2B Trial"

The indication of antibiotic prophylaxis in burn patients remains highly controversial and hasn't reached a consensus. The objective of antibiotic prophylaxis would be to reduce the risk of post-operative local and systemic infections. Burn surgery is associated with a high risk of bacteremia and postoperative infections and sepsis. However, antibiotic prophylaxis exposes to the risk of selecting drug-resistant pathogens as well as adverse effects of antibiotics (i.e Clostridium difficile colitis).

Recommendations regarding perioperative prophylaxis using systemic antibiotics vary across sources. The lack of data precludes any international strong recommendations regarding the best strategy regarding antibiotic prophylaxis.

The goal of this project is therefore to determine whether peri-operative systemic antibiotics prophylaxis could reduce the incidence of post-operative infections in burn patients.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

The intensive care unit investigator will verify the inclusion and non-inclusion criteria.

The following parameters will be collected at ICU/burn centers: Hemodynamic parameters; sepsis organ failure assessment (SOFA) score, Glasgow Coma scale; Medical history / comorbidities; Concomitant treatment; Burn wound bacterial colonization; Biological parameters.

The inclusion and randomization will be performed as late as possible before the first surgical procedure.

Randomization: Burn patients with deep burn between 5 to 40% TBSA requiring at least one excision surgery graft will be randomized to receive antibioprophylaxis (or placebo) 30 minutes before the incision with either first generation cephalosporin (cefazolin) (if absence of colonization to Pseudomonas aeruginosa); or piperacillin-tazobactam (if the burned area is colonized with Pseudomonas aeruginosa). We chose to target specifically Pseudomonas aeruginosa because it has been associated with significant morbidity and risk of graft lysis in burn patients.

No specific exams are required during the 7 days, 28 days and 90 days follow up visits.

The end of research visit is the 90-day follow-up visit. If the patient has been discharged from the hospital, the 90-day visit will consist of a telephone contact with the patient if he or she has been discharged home or with the medical team of the healthcare structure if the patient has been discharged to another structure.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

506

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75010
        • Recruiting
        • Saint Louis Hospital
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient over 18 years and less than 80 years old
  • Burned patients requiring at least one excision-graft surgery
  • Burn TBSA% between 5% and 40%
  • Signed informed consent or inclusion under the emergency provisions of the law (article L1122-1-2 of the CSP)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Proven severe allergy to cephalosporin or piperacilline-tazobactam or any other antibacterial agent of the penicillin class
  • History of severe allergic reaction to any other beta-lactam (eg cephalosporins, monobactams or carbapenems).
  • Patient on antibiotic therapy at the time of surgery
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding patient
  • Patient not covered by the social security
  • Patient transferred from another burn Unit
  • Patient participant in investigational competitive medicinal product study on the primary endpoint
  • Patient with local or systemic signs of infection requiring systemic antimicrobial therapy
  • Patient under guardianship
  • Patient under curatorship
  • known colonization of the burned area to be excised with tazocillin-resistant germ.
  • obese patient with BMI > 50 kg/m²

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: active group

The antibiotic prophylaxis will be cefazolin 2 g powder for solution for injection diluted in 50mL of NaCl 0.9%, IV infusion on 30 minutes with syringe pump, in case of absence of colonization to Pseudomonas aeruginosa prior to the surgical procedure.

The dose administer is 2g.

Antibiotic prophylaxis will be piperacilline-tazobactam 4 g powder for solution for injection diluted in 50mL of NaCl 0.9%, IV infusion on 30 minutes with syringe driver in patients with burn wound colonized to Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

The dose administer is 4g.

The antibiotic prophylaxis will be cefazolin 2 g, or piperacilline-tazobactam 4 g, powder for solution for injection diluted in 50mL of NaCl 0.9%, IV infusion on 30 minutes with syringe pump.
Other Names:
  • Cefazolin or piperacilline-tazobactam 4 g
Placebo Comparator: Placebo group
The control group will received, as placebo NaCl 0.9% solution for injection diluted in 50mL of NaCl 0.9%, IV infusion on 30 minutes with syringe pump.
The control group will received, as placebo NaCl 0.9% solution for injection diluted in 50mL of NaCl 0.9%, IV infusion on 30 minutes with syringe pump.
Other Names:
  • NaC 0,9%l

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Post-operative infection defined as Post-operative sepsis and/or Surgical site infection, and/or Graft lysis requiring a new graft within 7 days after surgery.
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Postoperative infection will be collected by the intensivists or infectious disease specialist consultant blinded to the interventional or control arm. Skin infection and skin graft lysis requiring a new graft procedure will be assess by a surgeon blinded of the arm of the study.
7 days after surgery
Post-operative sepsis
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Sepsis is defined as life-threatening organ dysfunction (defined by an increase of Sepsis related organ failure assessment [SOFA] score of 2 points or more) in response to infection. The minimum value is 0 and maximum value is 24. 0 meaning no organ dysfunction and 24 the maximum organ dysfunction.
7 days after surgery
Surgical site infection
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Surgical site (operated skin) infection with general signs is considered as a systemic infection originated from skin (Presence of a local or loco-regional inflammatory reaction; Unfavourable and unexpected local evolution; Lysis of grafts; Necrosis of fat located under the graft)
7 days after surgery
Graft lysis needing a new graft procedure
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Graft lysis is defined as a skin graft lysis in the 7 days post operative, and needing a new skin graft assessed be a surgeon blinded of the randomization group.
7 days after surgery

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Mortality
Time Frame: At day 90
Any death occurring between randomization and D 90
At day 90
Skin graft lysis requiring a new graft procedure
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Defined as a skin graft lysis in the 7 days post operative, and needing a new skin graft assessed be a surgeon blinded of the randomization group.
7 days after surgery
Postoperative bacteremia
Time Frame: within 7 days of surgery
Positive blood culture .
within 7 days of surgery
Post-operative pulmonary infection
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery

Imaging Test Evidence

Two or more serial chest imaging test results with at least one of the following:

New and persistent or Progressive and persistent

  • Infiltrate
  • Consolidation
  • Cavitation Signs/Symptoms/Laboratory

For ANY PATIENT, at least one of the following:

  • Fever (>38.0°C or >100.4°F)
  • Leukopenia (≤4000 WBC/mm) or leukocytosis (>12,000 WBC/mm)
  • For adults >70 years old, altered mental status with no other recognized cause

And at least two of the following:

  • New onset of purulent sputum or change in character of sputum, or increased respiratory secretions, or increased suctioning requirements
  • New onset or worsening cough, or dyspnea, or tachypnea
  • Rales or bronchial breath sounds
  • Worsening gas exchange
7 days after surgery
Post-operative surgical site infection
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
Skin infection with general signs is considered as a systemic infection originated from skin.
7 days after surgery
Number of hospitalization days living without antibiotic therapy
Time Frame: at Day 28 and Day 90
It will be calculated as the number of survival days without antibiotic therapy respectively between randomization and day 28 and day 90.
at Day 28 and Day 90
Number of days of hospitalization until complete healing (> 95% total burn surface area)
Time Frame: at Day 28 and Day 90
It will be calculated by the number of days between ICU complete healing and ICU discharge.
at Day 28 and Day 90
Number of patients with a colonization with a multidrug resistant bacteria.
Time Frame: at Day 28 and Day 90

It will be defined as :

AmpC producer enterobacteriacae Extended spectrum beta lactamase enterobacteriacae Carbapenemase producer enterobacteriacae Meticillin resistant aureus staphylococcus Vancomycine resistant enterococcus Piperacillin-Tazobactam resistant bacteria Imipenem resistant Acinetobacter Baumanii. And it will be mesured from results of bacterial cultures and/or genotyping with antibiogramm resistance profile

at Day 28 and Day 90

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: François DEPRET, MD, Department of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Burn Unit; Saint-Louis hospital

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 11, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

April 18, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 9, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 17, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 28, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

March 2, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 24, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 19, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Burns Surgery

Clinical Trials on active intervention

Subscribe