Methodology Issues in a Tailored Light Treatment for Persons With Dementia

July 7, 2023 updated by: Mariana Figueiro, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Phase 1 Methodology Issues in a Tailored Light Treatment for Persons With Dementia

Tailored light treatment will increase sleep efficiency, reduce depression and reduce agitation scores in those with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia

Study Overview

Detailed Description

In a within subjects, randomized placebo control study, a tailored light treatment will be used for short-term (4 weeks). Outcome measures include sleep measures (actigraphy), and questionnaires probing behavior and mood in those who have been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia. After a 4-week washout period, a placebo control inactive light will be used for another 4 weeks.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

45

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • New York
      • Albany, New York, United States, 12204
        • Recruiting
        • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Mariana G Figueiro, PhD
        • Contact:
      • New York, New York, United States, 10029

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

65 years and older (Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • major organ failure,
  • major illness,
  • history of head injury,
  • hypertension or diabetes,
  • use psychotropic (sleep aid) medicine, obstructing cataracts, macular degeneration, and blindness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Active Intervention
Light levels, primary and secondary measurements are obtained after a 4-week intervention period where active lighting is experienced by patients.
Subjects experience a baseline for 1 week and an active intervention for 4 weeks. The active intervention is a bluish white light source delivering at least 300 lux at the eye of the patient during at least 2 hours daily.
Placebo Comparator: Inactive intervention
Light levels, primary and secondary measurements are obtained after a 4-week intervention period where an inactive lighting is experienced by patients
Subjects experience a baseline for 1 week and an inactive intervention for 4 weeks. The inactive intervention is a yellowish white light source delivering at most 50 lux at the eye of the patient during at least 2 hours daily.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Sleep Disturbance
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Caregivers and subjects are asked to complete the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which is assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention. The seven component scores are summed to provide a global score ranging from 0 to 21 and a score of 5 or above indicates sleep disturbance. A higher number indications a greater sleep disturbance
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Agitation
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Caregivers and subjects are asked to fill out the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Score, which is assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention. All scores are summed for one total score - a higher score indicates more agitation
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Depression
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Caregivers and subjects are asked to fill out subjective questionnaires assessing depression using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Questionnaires are assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention. The CSDD consists of 19 questions rated on a scale of 0 to 2 with all scores summed for a total score. A score greater than 12 indicates depression and a higher score indicates greater depression.
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Activity of Daily Living
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Caregivers and subjects are asked to fill out subjective Activity of Daily Living questionnaire (MDS-ADL), which is assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention. Scores range from 4 to 18 and a higher score indicates a higher dependence.
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Light/dark patterns
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Subjects are asked to wear a calibrated light meter to obtain light/dark and activity/rest patterns for 7 days prior to intervention and for 7 days after 3 weeks that the light treatment is applied. These data are used to determine circadian disruption (correlation between light/dark and activity/rest) and light dose.
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Actigraphy
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
Subjects are asked to wear an actigraph to obtain activity/rest patterns for 7 days prior to intervention and for 7 days after 3 weeks that the light treatment is applied. Actigraphs are used to measure sleep efficiency.
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Mariana G Figueiro, PhD, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 30, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 15, 2013

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 21, 2013

First Posted (Estimated)

March 22, 2013

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 10, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 7, 2023

Last Verified

July 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Tailored Active intervention

3
Subscribe