- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01816152
Methodology Issues in a Tailored Light Treatment for Persons With Dementia
June 29, 2026 updated by: Mariana Figueiro, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Phase 1 Methodology Issues in a Tailored Light Treatment for Persons With Dementia
Tailored light treatment will increase sleep efficiency, reduce depression and reduce agitation scores in those with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
In a within subjects, randomized placebo control study, a tailored light treatment will be used for short-term (4 weeks).
Outcome measures include sleep measures (actigraphy), and questionnaires probing behavior and mood in those who have been diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia.
After a 4-week washout period, a placebo control inactive light will be used for another 4 weeks.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
44
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
New York
-
Albany, New York, United States, 12204
- Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai
-
New York, New York, United States, 10029
- Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years and older (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease and related dementia (ADRD)
Exclusion Criteria:
- major organ failure,
- major illness,
- history of head injury,
- hypertension or diabetes,
- use psychotropic (sleep aid) medicine, obstructing cataracts, macular degeneration, and blindness
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Participants with Dementia
All participants experience a baseline for 1 week and an active intervention for 4 weeks for all 3 conditions (high active intervention, mid level active intervention, and inactive intervention).
|
The active intervention is a bluish white light source delivering at least 500 lux at the eye of the patient during at least 2 hours daily.
The inactive intervention is a yellowish white light source delivering at most 50 lux at the eye of the patient during at least 2 hours daily.
The Mid level active intervention is a bluish white light source delivering at least 300 lux at the eye of the patient during at least 2 hours daily.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Caregivers (on behalf of subjects who cannot complete) and subjects are asked to complete the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), which is assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention.
The seven component scores are summed to provide a global score ranging from 0 to 21 and a score of 5 or above indicates sleep disturbance.
A higher number indications a greater sleep disturbance
|
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
|
Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Inventory (CMAI)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Caregivers (on behalf of subjects who cannot complete) and subjects are asked to fill out the Cohen-Mansfield Agitation Score, which is assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention.
29 item instrument, each item scored 1-7.
Total range score from 29-203 - a higher score indicates more agitation
|
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
|
Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Questionnaire
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Caregivers (on behalf of subjects who cannot complete) and subjects are asked to fill out subjective questionnaires assessing depression using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) Questionnaires are assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention.
The CSDD consists of 19 questions rated on a scale of 0 to 2 with all scores summed for a total score range 0-38.
A score greater than 12 indicates depression and a higher score indicates greater depression.
|
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Activity of Daily Living Questionnaire (MDS-ADL)
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Caregivers (on behalf of subjects who cannot complete) and subjects are asked to fill out subjective Activity of Daily Living questionnaire (MDS-ADL), which is assessed at baseline and after 4 weeks they are exposed to the lighting intervention.
Scores range from 4 to 18 and a higher score indicates a higher dependence.
|
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
|
Circadian Stimulus Dose
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Subjects are asked to wear a calibrated light meter to obtain light/dark and activity/rest patterns for 7 days prior to intervention and for 7 days after 3 weeks that the light treatment is applied.
These data are used to determine circadian disruption (correlation between light/dark and activity/rest) and light dose.
Circadian stimulus (CS) is the amount of light needed to activate the circadian system.
The range is 0 to 0.6 the higher the number the greater the CS dose
|
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
|
Sleep Efficiency Score
Time Frame: Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Subjects are asked to wear an actigraph to obtain activity/rest patterns for 7 days prior to intervention and for 7 days after 3 weeks that the light treatment is applied.
Actigraphs are used to measure sleep efficiency.
Full scale score from 0-100, higher score indicates better efficiency.
|
Change from Baseline (week 0) and intervention (week 4)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Mariana G Figueiro, PhD, Icahn School Of Medicine At Mount Sinai
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Hanford N, Figueiro M. Light therapy and Alzheimer's disease and related dementia: past, present, and future. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;33(4):913-22. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-121645.
- Figueiro MG, Hamner R, Higgins P, Hornick T, Rea MS. Field measurements of light exposures and circadian disruption in two populations of older adults. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;31(4):711-5. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120484.
- Figueiro MG, Plitnick BA, Lok A, Jones GE, Higgins P, Hornick TR, Rea MS. Tailored lighting intervention improves measures of sleep, depression, and agitation in persons with Alzheimer's disease and related dementia living in long-term care facilities. Clin Interv Aging. 2014 Sep 12;9:1527-37. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S68557. eCollection 2014.
- Figueiro MG, Plitnick B, Roohan C, Sahin L, Kalsher M, Rea MS. Effects of a Tailored Lighting Intervention on Sleep Quality, Rest-Activity, Mood, and Behavior in Older Adults With Alzheimer Disease and Related Dementias: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Sleep Med. 2019 Dec 15;15(12):1757-1767. doi: 10.5664/jcsm.8078. Epub 2019 Nov 8.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 1, 2020
Primary Completion (Actual)
May 10, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
May 10, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
March 15, 2013
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
March 21, 2013
First Posted (Estimated)
March 22, 2013
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
July 27, 2026
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 29, 2026
Last Verified
June 1, 2026
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Aberrant Motor Behavior in Dementia
- Neurologic Manifestations
- Nervous System Diseases
- Mental Disorders
- Behavioral Symptoms
- Neurobehavioral Manifestations
- Sleep Wake Disorders
- Dyskinesias
- Psychomotor Disorders
- Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms
- Behavior
- Signs and Symptoms
- Parasomnias
- Depression
- Psychomotor Agitation
Other Study ID Numbers
- GCO 20-4007
- 7R01AG034157-11 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.