- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04551092
Neurofeedback-EEG-VR System for Non-opioid Pain Therapy (NEVR)
October 24, 2025 updated by: Quantum Applied Science & Research, Inc.
Neurofeedback-EEG-VR (NEVR) System for Non-opioid Pain Therapy
This study will assess the feasibility of developing the Neurofeedback-EEG-VR (NEVR) system for non-opioid pain therapy.
Subjects suffering from pain will undergo sessions involving VR and Neurofeedback training and their pain will be assessed.
Study Overview
Detailed Description
QUASAR and UCSD are conducting a clinical trial on 25 subjects to evaluate the feasibility of a novel Neurofeedback electroencephalography (EEG) Virtual Reality (VR) system aimed at reducing chronic pain.
The NEVR device consists of a dry electrode EEG headset combined with a VR Head-Mounted Display (VR-HMD) device and neurofeedback software.
This approach relies on retraining the brain's networks to reduce the perception of pain and does not involve pharmaceutical drugs.
Patients with chronic lower back pain will be recruited by UCSD at its Altman Clinical & Translational Research Institute.
Patients that meet the recruitment criteria will be asked to conduct 20 1-hour long sessions of EEG-based Neurofeedback in VR over the course of a couple of months.
Pain assessment and device usability questionnaires will be conducted prior to and after the first and last sessions, and at intermediate time points.
This will be a single arm clinical trial aimed at demonstrating the safety and viability of the NEVR device, with the primary outcome measure being the ability of patients to conduct all 20 sessions safely and comfortably.
Secondary outcome measures include assessment of changes in pain perception, and of changes in EEG activity patterns.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
11
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
California
-
San Diego, California, United States, 92037
- Altman Clinical and Translational Research Institute
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
17 years to 90 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Chronic back pain that can be of multifactorial etiology inclusive of axial and radicular back pain
- Report a Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, or Visual Analog Score VAS) score of greater than 6/10
- Must be willing to for the duration of the study make no pharmacological adjustments or have additional Interventional therapies, as reported by the patient
- Must have the cognitive capacity to provide consent/assent
- Must be able to sit up in a chair during the recording session
- Must demonstrate understanding of the protocol, its purpose and subject participation
- Must be fluent in English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Measured head size too small or too large for the EEG equipment
- Any significant skull defect
- History of a recent craniotomy (within the last six months)
- Any signs of scalp inflammation, irritation, or abnormal skin conditions
- History of epilepsy or seizures
- Known allergies to any material to be used in this project
- Sight disabilities that make participation impractical
- Hair styles with thick braids or dread locks
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Other
- Allocation: N/A
- Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Single
Single group to receive intervention
|
a non-invasive, non-pharmacological alternative to treat pain by combining an innovative electroencephalography (EEG)-based Neurofeedback solution in an immersive virtual reality (VR) environment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Adverse Effect on Pain
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
Subjects' back pain will be assessed prior to and after the first, 10th and last sessions via the following standardized subjective, objective, behavioral and functional evaluation tests: 1) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS, or Visual Analog Pain Score (VAS), 2) The DALLAS scale; 3) Patient Assessment Global Change.
The researchers will compare the before and after session results to determine if the sessions had a negative impact on the patients' perceived pain.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Percent of Patients Completing the Study
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The researchers will calculate the percentage of patients who complete all 20 sessions of the study without any adverse effects nor any discomfort from the device or VR.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Patient Tolerance of Device
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The researchers will survey the subjects about their comfort of wearing the device after each session on a scale of 1-10, where 1 is intolerable, 5 is just tolerable, and 10 is most comfortable.
The researchers refer to this as the Comfort Scale.
|
up to 6 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in Pain Perception
Time Frame: 6 months
|
The researchers will evaluate changes in pain perception over the course of the 20 sessions as determined by the pain questionnaires listed above.
The researchers will plot the changes and calculate the percent change between the first to last measurement.
|
6 months
|
|
Dose Response
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The researchers will analyze the relationship between the number of sessions completed and the reported pain score of each of the three pain scales, as well as the EEG alpha synchrony.
The research team will calculate a trendline to determine if there is a positive or negative trend and calculate a correlation index.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Signal Quality
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The researchers will also calculate the percentage of the acquired EEG signal that is deemed to be unusable due to contamination by noise or artifacts (other than EMG or blink artifacts), as defined by regions where the root mean square (RMS) signal amplitude exceeds 100 microV.
|
up to 6 months
|
|
Changes in EEG Activity Patterns
Time Frame: up to 6 months
|
The researchers will calculate synchrony in electroencephalographic (EEG) alpha band (at 10Hz) across the temporal and central electrodes over the course of the 20 sessions.
The researchers will compare the percentage of synchrony changes inter- and intra-sessions.
|
up to 6 months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Walid Soussou, PhD, Quantum Applied Science & Research (QUASAR), Inc.
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
January 7, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
March 31, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
March 31, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 13, 2020
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 10, 2020
First Posted (Actual)
September 16, 2020
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 10, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 24, 2025
Last Verified
October 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- R43DA050380 (U.S. NIH Grant/Contract)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
UNDECIDED
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Pain Management
-
Yeditepe University HospitalCompletedPain Management | Breast Augmentation | Pain Management After Surgery | Pain Management in Postoperative CareTurkey
-
Kutahya Health Sciences UniversityBartın Unıversity; Mardin Artuklu UniversityCompletedPain Management | Nonpharmalogical Pain Management | Children Pain ManagementTurkey
-
Assiut UniversityNot yet recruitingPain Management | Neonates Pain Management
-
Misr University for Science and TechnologyActive, not recruitingPain | Pain Management | Pain Management in Postoperative CareEgypt
-
Wolfson Medical CenterUnknownPain Management | Post Surgical Management | Inflamation ManagementIsrael
-
Värmland County Council, SwedenSykehuset Telemark; Örebro University, Sweden; Dalarna County Council, Sweden; Region... and other collaboratorsCompletedInfant Pain Management | Parent-driven Pain ManagementSweden
-
Sintetica SACross S.A.CompletedPhase 1: Pain Management | Phase 2: Pain ManagementSwitzerland
-
Elazıg Fethi Sekin Sehir HastanesiNot yet recruiting
-
Istanbul Arel UniversityCompletedInfant Pain ManagementTurkey (Türkiye)
-
Zagazig UniversityCompletedPostoperative Pain ManagementEgypt
Clinical Trials on NEVR
-
New York UniversityVirtually Better, Inc.Active, not recruiting