Effectiveness of Exercise Program in Improving Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy

The Effect of Home Based Walking Exercise on Fatigue, Anxiety, Depression, Sleep Quality, Circadian Rhythms and Quality of Life in Patients With Gastric Cancer Undergoing Gastrectomy

This study will investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program in improving fatigue, negative emotions , sleep quality, circadian rhythms and quality of life in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy in Taiwan.

Hypothesis:

1. The fatigue in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
2. The negative emotions in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
3. The sleep quality in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd, 3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.
4. The quality of life in exercise group is significant improving than usual-care group at 1st, 2nd,3rd, 6th, 12th, 24th and 36th month.

Study Overview

• Status: Recruiting
• Conditions: Gastric Cancer
• Intervention / Treatment: Behavioral: exercise group

Detailed Description

This study will investigate the effectiveness of a rehabilitation program in improving fatigue, negative emotions , sleep quality, circadian rhythms and quality of life in patients with gastric cancer undergoing gastrectomy in Taiwan.

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Anticipated): 160
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

• Study Contact: Name: HUI-MEI CHEN, PhD; Phone Number: 886-939654302; Email: alice@ntunhs.edu.tw
• Study Contact Backup: Name: Pei-Shan Ho, BSN; Phone Number: 886-933937197; Email: psho@vghtpe.gov.tw

Study Locations

• Taiwan
  • Taipei county, Taiwan, 112
    • Recruiting
    • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
    • Contact: Taipei Veterans General Hospital; Phone Number: +886-2-2875-7808

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 20 years to 90 years (Adult, Older Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

1. After undergoing surgery and clinically diagnosed as gastric cancer.
2. Adults over 20 years old.
3. Hemoglobin (above 10 g/dL).
4. Clear consciousness and could communicate in either Mandarin or Taiwanese, and were not cognitively impaired were included.
5. No lower limb disability and able to walk on their own.

Exclusion Criteria:

1. Suspected or confirmed bone metastasis.
2. Poorly controlled cardiovascular disease such as heart failure, arrhythmia, angina, myocardial infarction, chest pain during activities or rest in the past three months, and valvular heart disease using anticoagulants.
3. Poorly diabetes controlled, glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1C)>9%, blood sugar higher than 250mg/dl or lower than 80mg/dl.
4. Those with poor blood pressure control, systolic blood pressure greater than 160mmHg or diastolic blood pressure than 100mmHg when quiet, and heart rate is greater than 100bpm when quiet.
5. Diagnosed as recurrent depression.
6. Regular exercise above moderate intensity, such as 150 minutes per week in the past three months.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

2

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: exercise group; A 12-week regimen of home-based walking exercises, comprising walking at a moderate intensity for 40 min, three times a Week.	Behavioral: exercise group; exercise education: A 12-week regimen of homebased walking exercises, include moderate intensity for 40 min, three times a week. We explained the participants how to perform the exercises, according to an instruction manual for the exercise regimen. Participants were instructed that the exercises would be effective only if they reached 40%-60% of the heart rate reserve, as determined by the Karvonen method, or 13-14 on the RPE. Exercise education: Weekly telephone or mobile application "LINE" consultations concerning exercise.we discussed whether participants' exercise fulfilled the prescribed intensity, duration, frequency and whether the participants experienced any adverse effects.
No Intervention: usual-care group; These participants follows the standard post-surgery follow-up consisting of counseling by dietitians, nurses and doctors.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	baseline (one week after recruited)
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30 )	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	1st month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	2nd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	3rd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	6th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	12th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	24th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-C30)	The EORTC QLQ-C30 :This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-C30 consists of three subscales with 30 questions. The EORTC QLQ-C30 have three subscales in the scale include functioning scales (15 questions), symptom scales (13 questions), and global health status (2 questions). The reliability and validity of Cronbach'α was 0.81-0.94. The functional scale and the global health status , the higher the total score, the better the quality of life; the lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	36th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	baseline (one week after recruited)
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	1st month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	2nd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	3rd month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	6th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	12th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	24th month after recruited
Quality of Life (EORTC QLQ-STO22)	The EORTC QLQ-STO22:This scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems in the past week. The EORTC QLQ-STO22 consists of one subscale with 22 questions.The EORTC QLQ-STO22 scale include symptom scales (22 questions) The Cronbach'α was 0.70-0.94.The lower the score in the symptom scale, the better the quality of life.	36th month after recruited

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total； it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	baseline (one week after recruited)
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total；it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	1st month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total；it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	2nd month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total； it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	3rd month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total； it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	6th month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total； it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	12th month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total； it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	24th month after recruited
fatigue(Brief Fatigue Inventory-Taiwan , BFI-T)	The scale is measured by the respondent self-assessed the frequency of various problems with activities of daily living in 24 hours. BFI-T has 9 questions in total； it is a self-reported 11-Point Likert Scale. Retest reliability was 0.89-0.97.	36th month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	baseline (one week after recruited)
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	1st month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	2nd month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	3rd month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	6th month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	12th month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	24th month after recruited
Emotional distress( Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS)	Emotional distress including anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale). The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale include anxiety and depression subscales, a total of 7 questions, each subscale is a four-point scoring method, 0 point for "not at all", 3 points for "always do", each subscale scores is between 0 and 21, that a score of 7 or less for non-cases, scores of 8-10 for doubtful cases and scores of 11 or more for definite cases.	36th month after recruited
sleep quality(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and using Actigraph)	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Actigraph is the gold standard for evaluating sleep disorders. As the name suggests, it is an electrophysiological recording of multiple parameters, including total sleep time(TST), sleep efficiency(SE), and sleep onset latency(SOL) which help to score various sleep stages.	baseline (one week after recruited)
sleep quality(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and using Actigraph)	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Actigraph is the gold standard for evaluating sleep disorders. As the name suggests, it is an electrophysiological recording of multiple parameters, including total sleep time(TST), sleep efficiency(SE), and sleep onset latency(SOL) which help to score various sleep stages.	3rd month after recruited
sleep quality(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and using Actigraph)	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Actigraph is the gold standard for evaluating sleep disorders. As the name suggests, it is an electrophysiological recording of multiple parameters, including total sleep time(TST), sleep efficiency(SE), and sleep onset latency(SOL) which help to score various sleep stages.	6th month after recruited
sleep quality(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and using Actigraph)	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Actigraph is the gold standard for evaluating sleep disorders. As the name suggests, it is an electrophysiological recording of multiple parameters, including total sleep time(TST), sleep efficiency(SE), and sleep onset latency(SOL) which help to score various sleep stages.	12th month after recruited
sleep quality(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and using Actigraph)	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Actigraph is the gold standard for evaluating sleep disorders. As the name suggests, it is an electrophysiological recording of multiple parameters, including total sleep time(TST), sleep efficiency(SE), and sleep onset latency(SOL) which help to score various sleep stages.	24th month after recruited
sleep quality(Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and using Actigraph)	The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) contains 19 self-rated questions and 5 questions rated by the bed partner or roommate (if one is available). Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is then calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, where lower scores denote a healthier sleep quality. Actigraph is the gold standard for evaluating sleep disorders. As the name suggests, it is an electrophysiological recording of multiple parameters, including total sleep time(TST), sleep efficiency(SE), and sleep onset latency(SOL) which help to score various sleep stages.	36th month after recruited
Circadian rhythms(using Actigraph)	Circadian rhythms including 24-h autocorrelation coefficient (r24) and in bed less than out of bed dichotomy index (I<O) collection from actigraphy.	baseline (one week after recruited)
Circadian rhythms(using Actigraph)	Circadian rhythms including 24-h autocorrelation coefficient (r24) and in bed less than out of bed dichotomy index (I<O) collection from actigraphy.	3rd month after recruited
Circadian rhythms(using Actigraph)	Circadian rhythms including 24-h autocorrelation coefficient (r24) and in bed less than out of bed dichotomy index (I<O) collection from actigraphy.	6th month after recruited
Circadian rhythms(using Actigraph)	Circadian rhythms including 24-h autocorrelation coefficient (r24) and in bed less than out of bed dichotomy index (I<O) collection from actigraphy.	12th month after recruited
Circadian rhythms(using Actigraph)	Circadian rhythms including 24-h autocorrelation coefficient (r24) and in bed less than out of bed dichotomy index (I<O) collection from actigraphy.	24th month after recruited
Circadian rhythms(using Actigraph)	Circadian rhythms including 24-h autocorrelation coefficient (r24) and in bed less than out of bed dichotomy index (I<O) collection from actigraphy.	36th month after recruited

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan
• Investigators: Study Chair: Hui-Mei Chen, PhD, National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences, Taipei, Taiwan

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): November 10, 2020
• Primary Completion (Anticipated): October 31, 2024
• Study Completion (Anticipated): October 31, 2025

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: September 21, 2020
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: October 13, 2020
• First Posted (Actual): October 19, 2020

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): December 21, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: December 19, 2021
• Last Verified: December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: fatigue; Quality of Life; depression; anxiety; gastrectomy; sleep quality
• Additional Relevant MeSH Terms: Digestive System Diseases; Neoplasms; Neoplasms by Site; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Digestive System Neoplasms; Gastrointestinal Diseases; Stomach Diseases; Stomach Neoplasms
• Other Study ID Numbers: 2020-10-006A

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: YES
• IPD Plan Description: Individual participant data that underlie the results reported in this article, after deidentification (text, tables, figures, and appendices).
• IPD Sharing Time Frame: Beginning 12 months following article publication
• IPD Sharing Access Criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and receive the authors consent.
• IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type: STUDY_PROTOCOL

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No