Effect of Prayer on Conditioned Pain Modulation and on Pain Intensity in Healthy Religious University Students

August 31, 2021 updated by: charbel najem, Antonine University

The Effect of Praying on Endogenous Pain Modulation and Pain Intensity in Healthy Religious Individuals: A Randomized Controlled Experiment

With this study the investigators wish to examine the effect of prayer on pain intensity and on the conditioned pain modulation in healthy religious university students.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

There has been a call for a model that incorporate spirituality in the biopsychosocial framework .The biopsychosocial- spiritual model recognizes the impact of the religious factors in modulating the biology of pain.

The aim of this study is to measure the effect of praying as an intervention on conditioned pain modulation and on pain intensity.

The investigators hypothesize that prayer would increase conditioned pain modulation compared to a no prayer control group in a healthy religious population.

The investigators hypothesize that participants engaging in active prayer will show a higher increase in conditioned pain modulation compared to those engaging in passive prayer or no prayer.

The present study is a randomized controlled trial comparing the effect of two types of prayer, the passive and the active prayer and no prayer, on conditioned pain modulation using the heat protocol and on pain intensity. Participants are to be randomly assigned to 2 groups: the prayer group and the control group.

The control group is of (n=50) participants and the prayer group is (n=150) participants to be divided according to the style of praying identified by the prayer function scale into active and passive prayer group.

Appropriate statistical analyses will be performed to evaluate and compare treatment effects.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

208

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beirut, Lebanon
        • Antonine University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years to 21 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy female.
  • Healthy male.
  • University students
  • Religious participants who would score at least two over six on the Non Organizational Religious Activities subscale of the Duke University Religious Index.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant women.
  • Individuals with chronic pain.
  • Individuals with psychiatric disease.
  • Individuals suffering from headache for more than 2 days a month.
  • Individuals with high blood pressure.
  • Individuals under regular use of medication.
  • Individuals who would score 1 or 0 on the on the Non Organizational Religious Activities subscale of the Duke University Religious Index.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Screening
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: active prayer group
the active prayer group will mediate over an active type of prayer
Prayer is a non-pharmaceutical method of pain management and a form of alternative medicine.
Experimental: passive prayer group
the passive prayer group will mediate over a passive type of prayer
Prayer is a non-pharmaceutical method of pain management and a form of alternative medicine.
Sham Comparator: control group
the control group will read a poem
Reading is a distraction tool for pain management

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
change in conditioned pain modulation (CPM)
Time Frame: Measured prior to intervention (baseline=day 1) and immediate following the intervention (=day 1)
the conditioned pain modulation paradigm (pressure pain threshold using a digital algometer as test stimulus and the heat pressor test (immersion of one hand in hot water of 45.5°C) as conditioning stimulus
Measured prior to intervention (baseline=day 1) and immediate following the intervention (=day 1)
change in pain intensity
Time Frame: Measured prior to intervention (baseline=day 1) and immediate following the intervention (=day 1)
numeric rating scale from 0 to 100 where 0 is no pain and 100 is the worst pain imaginable
Measured prior to intervention (baseline=day 1) and immediate following the intervention (=day 1)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The Duke University Religion Index
Time Frame: religiosity is assessed at baseline
1.The religiosity level will be measured using the Duke University Religiosity scale, it is a 5-item self-report measure of religious involvement scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (a great deal). It assesses the three major dimensions of religiosity, organizational religious activity, non-organizational religious activity, and intrinsic religiosity .
religiosity is assessed at baseline
Prayer function scale
Time Frame: the prayer function scale is assessed at baseline

is a self-report instrument that assesses the motivation or purpose behind an individual's prayer while she or he is coping with difficult circumstances.

The scale consists of 58 items that are scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale ranging from 1 (almost never) to 5 (a great deal).

The measure contains four scales: Provides Acceptance (17 items), Provides Calm and Focus (11 items), Deferring/Avoiding , and Provides Assistance (14 items).

The deferring/avoiding scale represent a passive type of prayer The assistance scale represent an active type of prayer.

the prayer function scale is assessed at baseline

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Director: Mira Meeus, Phd, University Ghent

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 1, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 20, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 1, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 5, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2021

Last Verified

August 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • charbel najem

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

the data will only be used for this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe