Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With H-coil in Parkinson's Disease (rTMS-PD) (rTMS-PD)

November 16, 2020 updated by: Giancarlo Comi

Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation With H-coil in Parkinson's Disease: A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study

Focal repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) has been applied to improve symptoms in Parkinson disease (PD) with conflicting results. However, the stimulation with H-coil has been shown to stimulate a wider cortical area compared with the standard coils, with preliminary results confirming the potential efficacy of the treatment. In this study the investigators aimed to explore the safety and efficacy of excitatory rTMS with H-coil on PD motor symptoms.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled study, with a 1:1:1 randomization into three groups: group 1 - real rTMS over primary motor cortex and prefrontal cortex (M1-PFC): group 2 - real rTMS over M1 and sham rTMS over PFC; group 3 - sham stimulation over both targets

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

60

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • MI
      • Milan, MI, Italy, 20132
        • IRCCS San Raffaele

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 80 years (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female subjects aged ≤80 years
  • Diagnosis of Parkinson's disease according to UK Brain Bank criteria
  • Hoehn and Yahr (HY) scale II-IV
  • Stable anti-depressive and anti-parkinsonian therapy for at least two months prior to enrollment
  • Subjects who answered all questions in the TMS pre-treatment safety questionnaire in a negative manner.
  • Have given written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of an additional neurological or psychiatric pathology
  • Severe personality disorder
  • Uncontrolled hypertension.
  • History of epilepsy, seizures, febrile convulsions.
  • History of epilepsy or seizures in first degree relatives.
  • History of head injury or stroke.
  • Presence of metal prostheses in the head (except dental fillings).
  • Metal implants or known history of any metal particles in the eye, cardiac pacemakers, cochlear implants, use of neurostimulators or medical pumps.
  • History of migraine within the past six months.
  • History of drug or alcohol abuse.
  • Impossibility of adequate communication with the examiner.
  • Participation in another clinical study, either concomitant or within the previous 3 months.
  • Inability to sign the consent form.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Real rTMS stimulation over M1 and PFC
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and PFC
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over PFC
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and PFC
Active Comparator: Real rTMS stimulation over M1 and sham rTMS over PFC
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and PFC
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over PFC
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and PFC
Sham Comparator: Sham rTMS over M1 and PFC
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and PFC
Real repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over PFC
Sham repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with H-coil over M1 and PFC

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change at Unified Parkinson's disease rating scale III over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
A comprehensive 50 question assessment of both motor and non-motor symptoms associated with Parkinson's
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Incidence of Treatment-Emergent adverse events [Safety and Tolerability of rTMS]
Time Frame: End of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment)
monitoring presence of side effects due to the stimulation
End of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Change at Pegboard test over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at Tapping test over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at Up & Go Test over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at dyskinesia rating scale over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at and at Word Fluency test over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at Digit forward & backward test over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at Beck Depression Inventory scale-II over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Change at The Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale ( CGI-S) over time
Time Frame: Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)
Baseline evaluation, end of treatment (1 month after start of the treatment) and end of follow-up (2 months after start of the treatment)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Giancarlo Comi, MD, IRCCS San Raffaele

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 27, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 8, 2012

Study Completion (Actual)

July 2, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 20, 2020

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 16, 2020

Last Verified

November 1, 2020

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

all IPD that underlie results in a publication

IPD Sharing Time Frame

starting 6 months after publication

IPD Sharing Access Criteria

data are available from the corresponding author, upon reasonable request

IPD Sharing Supporting Information Type

  • ICF
  • ANALYTIC_CODE

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe