Chronic Pain and Conditioned Pain Modulation After on Line-behavioral Approach (Be-Home-Pain)

Effectiveness of Home- Behavioral Approach by Mindfulness Added to Pharmacological Treatment on Endogenous Pain Modulation in Patients With Chronic Pain: Results at Long-term (Be-Home-Pain)

Chronic pain is a disabling condition associated with progressive changes and decline in psychological wellbeing. According with a modern conceptualization, pain has to be considered a biopsychosocial disorder where biological, affective, social and psychological aspects are strictly connected. Although this new conceptualization, the implementation of an integral systems approach of psychological tenets into treatments for chronic pain are limited. Concerning treatments of chronic pain condition, the literature of the last years has demonstrated how clinical benefit can be improved when traditional therapies are combined with behavioral approaches in particular mindfulness. Systemic quantitative-somatosensory testing of Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) can be considered a measure of endogenous modulation of pain and it has been used in different clinical experiences to evaluate the effectiveness of different pain treatments even if non pharmacological approaches.

Study Overview

Status

Not yet recruiting

Conditions

Detailed Description

Chronic pain is a disabling condition associated with progressive changes and decline in psychological wellbeing. The burden of this condition is significant and also the epidemiological impact. According with a modern conceptualization, pain has to be considered a biopsychosocial disorder where biological, affective, social and psychological aspects are strictly connected. Although this new conceptualization, the implementation of an integral systems approach of psychological tenets into treatments for chronic pain are limited. Concerning treatment of chronic pain condition, the literature of the last years has demonstrated how clinical benefit can be improved when traditional therapies are combined with behavioral approaches in particular mindfulness, that help patients to become more conscious about their symptoms and able to manage pain without medication.

Systemic quantitative-somatosensory testing of Conditioned Pain Modulation (CPM) can be considered a measure of endogenous modulation of pain and it has been used in different clinical experiences to evaluate the effectiveness of different pain treatments even if non pharmacological approaches Aim of this study: A group of patients suffering from Chronic Migraine and Chronic Neuropathic Pain will be studied and followed with a specific mindfulness protocol, added to traditional pharmacological therapy, performed on-line for 8 weeks. In order to determine if the behavioral approach can improve their clinical condition patients will be followed for 12 months after treatments with regular visits every 3 months.

Also, in order to assess the integrity and improvement of the endogenous pain inhibitory control a conditioned pain modulation paradigm will be performed at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months. Patients will perform a baseline evaluation of thermal pain and mechanical pain tresholds using the quantitative sensory methods, including the determination of heat-generated temporal summation. Then, at baseline and at 3, 6, 12 months follow up, the CPM paradigm will be performed using two heat painful stimuli, a tonic heat stimulus as conditioning stimulus and a phasic heat stimulus as test stimuli.

Patients will be treated by traditional pharmacological therapies added to behavioral approach (mindfulness on line by using a specific platform (STARLEAF)) (TAU/MIND) Eight weekly one-hour video-sessions of mindfulness practice will be scheduled for patients; instructions to manage pain and to encourage the use of strategies for pain management will be given.

Moreover, instructions for behavioral approach and mindfulness, to practice every day will be given: daily standardized mindfulness sessions of 12 minutes, by smartphone, recorded by the expert who generally manages their sessions at the hospital will be scheduled for patients Neuropsychological assessment will be provided at baseline and at every follow up Clinical, neurophysiological and neuropsychological results will be compared to those obtained from another group of patients treated by traditional pharmacological treatment (TAU) This preliminary study will be conducted on 35 patients with diagnosis of CM and Chronic Neuropathic Pain performed at our center.

Specific questionnaires for cognitive assessment and disability, catastrophizing attitude, anxiety, depression, acceptance, pain coping will be performed at baseline and repeated at every follow up ( PCS; GSE; HADS; CPAQ; AAQ; MAAS). The pain diary will be checked too with scheduled NSR evaluation. The questionnaires will be repeated at every follow up and the pain diary will be evaluated.

Results will be collected at baseline up to 12 months after treatment for both groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

35

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of chronic Migraine and Chronic Neuropathic Pain
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Co-existent severe medical or psychiatric illnesses
  • Use of opioids during the 3 months before the inclusion into the protocol
  • Practice of mindfulness in the last 12 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Treatment as usual (TAU)
Any pharmacological therapy used for managing chronic pain or chronic migraine
Any pharmacological therapy used for managing chronic pain or chronic migraine
Other: TAU plus behavioral approach
Any pharmacological therapy used for managing chronic pain or chronic migraine added with behavioral approach (mindfulness) delivered on line and smart phone for 6 weekly sessions
Any pharmacological therapy used for managing chronic pain or chronic migraine
Behavioral approach (mindfulness) delivered on line and smart phone for 6 weekly sessions

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain intensity
Time Frame: From the first visit to the first follow up at 3 months till the last follow up at 12 months
Mean NRS (Numerical Rating Scale evaluation from the Daily diary card ) difference of at least 2 points on the scale(the scale range is from 0=no pain to 10 =maximum pain perceived) between MIND/TAU and TAU groups assessed by the daily diary card.
From the first visit to the first follow up at 3 months till the last follow up at 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change of pain frequency
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Decrease in pain frequency, (days of pain per month) assessed by Daily Diary Card.
6 and 12 months
Change of medication intake
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
Decrease of number of symptomatic medications per month assessed by Daily Diary Card.
6 and 12 months
Neurophysiological indexes
Time Frame: 3, 6 and 12 months
Changes in neurophysiological indexes evaluated by quantitative sensory test for conditioned pain modulation analysis.
3, 6 and 12 months
Psychological measures - coping strategies
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
  • Pain Catastrophizing Scale-Italian, PCS-I (Monticone et al., 2012)
  • cut-off: 0 - 30 normal ranges > 30 abnormal
6 and 12 months
Psychological measures - Quality of life
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
  • General Self-Efficacy Scale, GSE ( (Schwarzer et al., 1995)
  • cut off: 0 - 10 abnormal 10 - 40 normal ranges
6 and 12 months
Psychological measures - Mood
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
  • Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, HADS (Costantini et al., 1999)
  • cut-off: total score 0 -7 = normal total score > 7 = impairment
6 and 12 months
Psychological measures - Mindfulness specific tests
Time Frame: 6 and 12 months
  • Mindful Awareness Attention Scale, MAAS (Veneziani et al., 2015) for mindfulness attitude for patients randomized in the MIND/TAU group
  • cut-off: 15 - 90 normal ranges
6 and 12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

September 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 31, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 22, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

April 26, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 28, 2021

Last Verified

April 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Be-Home-Pain

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine

Clinical Trials on treatment as usual (TAU) (pharmacological)

Subscribe