Monoclonal CGRP Antibodies for Migraine Prevention - a Nationwide Real Life Study

October 19, 2022 updated by: Austrian Migraine Registry Collaboration

Non-interventional Study of the Austrian Headache Society: Monoclonal CGRP Antibodies for Migraine Prevention a Nationwide Real Life Study

The present non-interventional study on migraine prevention with monoclonal CGRP antibodies adresses questions concering safety, swichting from one CGRP mab to another, efficacy on auras in the real world setting.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Introduction:

Monoclonal antibodies against calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) or its receptor (CGRP-R) are an effective option for the preventative treatment in episodic and chronic migraine. All monoclonal antibodies against CGRP or CGRP-R have been proven efficacious in all various treatment endpoints (i.e. reduction of MMDs, improvement in Quality of Life etc.) in randomized phase 3 trials and were therefore approved by FDA and EMA. However, real world clinical experience/data in "non-study" patients is lacking as is data on long-term efficacy, elderly or data on switchers between antibodies that cannot be derived out of previous trials.

Phase 3 and 4 studies have addressed issues of efficacy and safety in highly selected clinical study populations and so far no safety concerns have emerged. However, long-term data are limited to a maximum period of 5 years and have been acquired in selected study cohorts probably not reflecting a "real world" patient population. It is a main goal of the study to acquire data on safety and efficacy in a real world setting where patients will be less selected than in clinical studies in terms of accompanying diseases or comorbidities. Another knowledge gap concerns the optimal procedure when switching the patient from one anti-CGRP therapy to another or being paused (and re-initiated) after a first successful treatment period. With specific evidence lacking, it is frequently recommended to wait several half-lives before initiating the next anti-CGRP therapy. Another unresolved question is whether non-responders to CGRP ligand blockers may respond to CGRP-receptor blockers and vice versa. While efficacy of anti-CGRP therapies has been demonstrated for migraine with and without aura, possible effects on the migraine auras per se have not been reported.

Phase 4 studies (non-interventional studies) on treatment with anti-CGRP therapies are being conducted in several countries in Europe. These are, however, limited to one specific substance. The proposed project will allow collecting data on the use of erenumab, fremanezumab, and galcanezumab on a nation- wide basis up to 36 months in a real-life setting.

The following knowledge should emerge from the registry:

Anti-CGRP therapies can be safely used in a wide spectrum of migraine patients with comorbidities and accompanying diseases over a long time period. There will be evidence how patients can be switched from one CGRP antibody to another. There will be an evidence base to switch anti-CGRP-therapies from ligand- to receptor- blockers or vice versa. Additionally the question whether a mAB even if effective should be paused or not after 1 year of treatment and what effect this pause might have will be addressed subsequently.

Methods Collected data will be entered in an electronic platform provided by Health Austria (https://goeg.at/) which has long-term experience in conducting and maintaining nation-wide registries, e.g. the Austrian Stroke Registry.

Non interventional study - The decision for therapy with an anti-CGRP monoclonal antibody/ CGRP antagonist is made by the treating physician and is NOT part of the Study. The study was approved by the relevant ethics committees and registered at a platform of the Austrian Agency for Health an Nutrition Safety at https://forms.ages.at/nis/. All patients treated in the headache centers are keeping headache diaries on paper or in electronic form as a standard of care procedure. Prospective and retrospective data collection from electronic charts is possible. Data are collected during routine visits which are scheduled in 3 months intervals. Collected data will be entered in an electronic platform provided by Health Austria (https://goeg.at/) in an anonymized form.

Study funding: Scientific reports concerning fremanezumab will be provideded to TEVA Austria, reports on erenumab to Novartis Austria and on galcanezumab to Eli Lilly Austria, based on financial compensation agreements.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1500

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

    • Tirol
      • Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria, A6020
        • Recruiting
        • Medical University Innsbruck
        • Contact:
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Gregor Broessner, gregor.broessner@i-med.ac.at
    • Vienna
      • Wien, Vienna, Austria, 1090

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Male or female adult patients of at least 18 years or older in whom CGRP mabs can be prescribed according to Austrian regulations. These include treatment failure or intolerability / contraindications of at least 3 prophylactic medications. Documentation of treatment in a headache diary on paper or in digital format.

Description

Inclusion Criteria (all of the follwing)

  • episodic or chronic migraine with or without aura
  • erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab is prescribed as a standard of care treatment by treating physician Eptinezumab may be included as soon as available in Austria.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Off label use of erenumab, fremanezumab or galcanezumab

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Erenumab
Patients will be treated with this drug within standard of care treatment
treatment with erenumab as chosen by treating physician
Galcanezumab
Patients will be treated with this drug within standard of care treatment
treatment with galcanezumab as chosen by treating physician
Fremanezumab
Patients will be treated with this drug within standard of care treatment
treatment with fremanezumab as chosen by treating physician

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Migraine days per month (= 4 weeks) from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Either of the following: (i) patient has treated headache with a triptan (ii) criteria C+ D for migraine without aura are fulfilled (iii) criteria B+C for migraine with aura are fulfilled
6 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in headache days per month (= 4 weeks) from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Any day with headache
6 months
Change in aura days per month (= 4 weeks) from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Any day with at least one migraine aura
6 months
Change in days with acute headache medication per month (= 4 weeks) from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Any days on which medication against migraine was taken by the patient
6 months
Change in days with triptans per month (= 4 weeks) from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Any days on which triptans medication were taken by the patient
6 months
Change in headache intensity from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Usual intensity of headche attacks on a numerical rating scale from 1 -10. Higher numbers indicate more severe headache attacks
6 months
Change in unpleasantness of aura from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Usual unpleasantness of aura on a numerical rating scale from 1 -10. Higher numbers indicate more unpleasantness.
6 months
Change in migraine duration from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Usual duration of migraine headache attack
6 months
Change in migraine aura duration from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Usual duration of migraine aura
6 months

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Subjective change in quality of life from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
3 point scale: improved, unchanged, worse
6 months
Change in MIDAS (Migraine Diasability Assessment Questionnaire) scores from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Migraine Disability Assessment Questionnaire. A higher Score indicates more disability. mnimum = 0, maximum =270
6 months
Change in impact of headache from baseline to month 6
Time Frame: 6 months
Questionnaire. Higher scores indicate more impact of headache. Minmum= 36, maximum =38
6 months
Adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 36 months. Assessment every 3 months, may differ between study centers.
Any treatment emergent adverse events, Causality according to FDA rating: unlikely, possible, probable
Up to 36 months. Assessment every 3 months, may differ between study centers.
Serious adverse events
Time Frame: Up to 36 months. Assessment every 3 months, may differ between study centers. Baseline refers to the 4 weeks interval before treatment start
Definiation and causality according to FDA
Up to 36 months. Assessment every 3 months, may differ between study centers. Baseline refers to the 4 weeks interval before treatment start

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Gregor Broessner, Prof, Medical University Innbruck

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

September 1, 2025

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 23, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 15, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 16, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

October 20, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 19, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

Yes

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Migraine

Clinical Trials on Erenumab

3
Subscribe