- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT04873843
The Impact of Multi-Touch Functional Digital Game on Intelligence and Vitality for the Community-dwelling Elderly
September 20, 2022 updated by: Samsung Medical Center
This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial includes 32 elderly.
The participants were randomized to intervention(Happy Table) and control(cognitive stimulation activity) groups.
Each group is divided in 16 participants.
In one session, participants in the Happy Table group completed 40 minutes of intervention using Happy Table serious game, whereas those in the Control group completed 40 minutes of cognitive stimulation game.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
At the first visit, the subjects are fully informed of the study if appropriate after determining whether they meet the selection criteria.
This single-blinded, randomized, controlled trial includes 32 elderly.
The participants were randomized to intervention(Happy Table) and control(cognitive stimulation activity) groups.
Each group is divided in 16 participants.
In one session, participants in the Happy Table group completed 40 minutes of intervention using Happy Table serious game, whereas those in the Control group completed 40 minutes of cognitive stimulation game.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
32
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Seoul, Korea, Republic of, 06351
- Samsung Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
65 years to 84 years (Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- community-dwelling senior citizens aged 65 to 84
- Those without a history of central nervous system(CNS) disease
Exclusion Criteria:
- When it is difficult to understand the task performance due to severe cognitive decline(Korean Simple Mental State Test, K-MMSE 10 points or less).
- When it is difficult to use this game device due to problems such as decreased vision or fracture of the upper limb
- In case of accompanying serious mental illness
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Single
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Functional digital game training group
These functional digital game programs have been developed to improve the intelligence and vitality in the community-dwelling elderly.
The program includes sub-categories such as attention, working memory, memory and executive functions with various levels of difficulty.
|
Functional digital game training group is divided in 16 participants.
In one session, participants in the functional digital game training group completed 40 minutes of intervention using various functional digital game such as working memory, memory, and attention.
(Total 10 session)
|
|
Experimental: Individual cognitive training
Individual cognitive training has been used to improve the intelligence and cognitive function in community-dwelling elderly.
The program includes sub-categories such as attention, working memory, memory and executive functions with various levels of difficulty.
|
Functional digital game training group is divided in 16 participants.
In one session, participants in the individual cognitive training group completed 40 minutes of intervention using various cognitive training such as working memory, memory, and attention.
(Total 10 session)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline performance on Stroop test (Neuropsychological test) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
It measures a participant's processing speed, selective attention and inhibitory control.
The participant will be asked to read 'word' of the colored words or 'name of the color' of the colored words in separate trials.
The main scores produced in this test are completion time and errors.
The contrast score of the two trial's completion time means interference.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Change from baseline performance on Fluency Test (Neuropsychological test) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
This is a generative naming test.
That measure how many words you can spontaneously speak within a limited time of words that fall into a specific category (e.g.
animals, store goods, vegetables) or words starting with a letter (e.g.
F • A • S or C·F·L).
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline performance on Trail Making Test (Neuropsychological test) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
It consists of type A and type B trials.
The participant should connect the numbers (1~25) as quickly as possible in Type A trial, and connect the numbers (1~13) and alphabets (A~L) alternatively as quickly as possible in type B trial.
The main scores produced in this test are completion time and errors.
Higher score means worse performance.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline performance on Digit Span Test (Neuropsychological test) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
It measures auditory attention span and includes forward and backward trials.
The participant listens to a series of numbers and calls the sequence correctly.
The sequence increases in each trial.
The final score is the longest number of sequential digits that the participant can remember correctly.
The scores range from 3 to 8. The higher the score, the better the performance.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline performance on Auditory Verbal Learning test (Neuropsychological test) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
It measures participant's verbal memory.
The participant will hear 15 words and recall them immediately and after 20 minutes again.
The main scores produced in this test are the numbers of recalled words of the immediate and delayed trials.
Immediate memory score is the sum of 5 trial's correct response and score ranges between 0 and 60.
Delayed memory score is the correct response of the delayed trial and the score range is 0 to 15.
Higher score means better performance.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy (fNIRS) during the intervention(Day 1 and 12)and after intervention completion(Day 12)
Time Frame: Baseline, during the intervention(Day 1 and 12), Through intervention completion(Day 12)
|
It measures brain activity during cognitive tasks to see if cognitive training affects brain function.
|
Baseline, during the intervention(Day 1 and 12), Through intervention completion(Day 12)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on Contrasting Program/Go-No-Go test after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, Day 13(After the intervention)
|
The Contrasting Program and go-no go test requires a subject to emit a simple motor response to one cue while inhibiting the response in the presence of another cue.
This test has been effective in demonstrating impulsivity (elevated commission error rate) in elderly with attention deficit.
|
Baseline, Day 13(After the intervention)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
GDS is a 15-item self-report assessment used to identify depression in the elderly.
A score of 0 to 5 is normal.
A score greater than 5 suggests depression
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on health-related quality of life instrument with 20 items (HINT-20) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
The total score of the HINT-20 is converted to a 0-100 scale, with higher scores indicating better health-related quality of life.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE) after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
General self-efficacy (GSE), individuals'belief in their ability to perform well in a variety of situations.
General self-efficacy (GSE) is the belief in one's competence to attempt difficult or novel tasks, and to cope with adversity arising from specific demanding situations.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on International Physical Activity Questionnaire after the intervention (Day 13).
Time Frame: Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
Physical Activity Questionnaire collects information on physical activity participation in three settings (or domains) as well as sedentary behaviour, comprising 16 questions.
|
Baseline, After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
User Satisfaction Questionnaire after intervention.
Time Frame: After the intervention (Day 13)
|
We evaluate the satisfaction questionnaire for each training.
|
After the intervention (Day 13)
|
|
Change from baseline activity on smart band activity through intervention completion(Day 12).
Time Frame: Baseline, through intervention completion(Day 12)
|
Each participant was given an smart band(number of steps count) and instructed to wear it on the wrist during waking hours until completion of the training program.
This included both intervening training days (totaling 10).
|
Baseline, through intervention completion(Day 12)
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
September 16, 2021
Primary Completion (Actual)
February 21, 2022
Study Completion (Actual)
August 4, 2022
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2021
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 4, 2021
First Posted (Actual)
May 5, 2021
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
September 22, 2022
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
September 20, 2022
Last Verified
April 1, 2021
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 2021-03-011
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Aging
-
Florida Institute for Human and Machine CognitionNot yet recruitingAging | Healthy Aging | Aging WellUnited States
-
Tuba MadenCompletedAging | Aging Problems | Aging Disorder
-
University of CopenhagenRecruitingAging | Healthy Aging | Aging FrailtyDenmark
-
Radboud University Medical CenterTerminated
-
Northwestern UniversityPotocsnak Human Longevity LabRecruitingAging | Aging Well | Aging, Biological | Aging, HealthyUnited States
-
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de NiceNot yet recruitingAging | Aging, HealthyFrance
-
University of Santiago de CompostelaEuropean Regional Development Fund; Center for Industrial Technological Development...Completed
-
TruDiagnosticBlushield USANot yet recruitingAging | Aging Well
-
Arizona State UniversityActive, not recruiting
-
San Diego State UniversityCompleted
Clinical Trials on Functional digital game training group
-
Maltepe UniversityCompleted
-
Medipol UniversityNot yet recruiting
-
Massachusetts Eye and Ear InfirmaryWithdrawnHigh-Frequency Hearing Loss
-
Istanbul Medeniyet UniversityNot yet recruitingDecision Making | Ethics
-
Riphah International UniversityCompletedChronic Low-back PainPakistan
-
Riphah International UniversityRecruitingMuscle Strength | Physical Endurance | Functional PerformancePakistan
-
Children's Hospital of Fudan UniversityCompletedAttention Deficit Hyperactivity DisorderChina
-
Hospital Sirio-LibanesUniversity of Nove de JulhoCompleted
-
National Cheng Kung UniversityUnknownEffects of Cognitive Strategy Training on Daily Function in People With Subjective Cognitive DeclineSubjective Cognitive DeclineTaiwan
-
Eastern Mediterranean UniversityCompleted