Digital Therapy for Treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

March 24, 2026 updated by: Children's Hospital of Fudan University

A Randomized Clinical Trial to Assess The Effectiveness and Safety of Digital Therapy for Treating Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in Children

This study is designed to explore the effect of Multitask game-based digital therapy versus Schulte Grid digital game on attentional functioning (measured by the TOVA), ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, and clinical impairment, in children diagnosed with ADHD. Investigators will also evaluate the safety of digital therapy for intervention treatment of childhood attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

ADHD is a common neurodevelopmental disorder characterized by a persistent pattern of inattention and/or hyperactivity and impulsivity, resulting in functional impairment in multiple settings.The prevalence in China is estimated to be 6.26%. Front-line intervention for ADHD includes pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions, which have shown short-term efficacy.There are limitations to current best practices for the treatment of ADHD.

Relating to pharmacotherapy, they are accompanied by adverse events in many children, do not normalize functioning , and adherence rates over time are generally low. Pharmacotherapy may not be suitable for some patients.Relating to non-pharmacological interventions, barriers to access limit the use of non-pharmacological interventions, given a shortage of properly trained paediatric mental health specialists and variability in insurance coverage for such services.

Digital therapy for ADHD may address these limitations with improved access, minimal side-effects, and low potential for abuse.There are studies show that digital intervention can significantly increase attentional functioning of children with ADHD.At present, there are few related researches on digital therapy in China.The total number of ADHD children is large in China, and electronic products are very popular in Chinese families.If digital therapies suitable for ADHD children in China can be developed, it will be of great significance for the promotion of human health.

Therefore, investigators designed the study to explore the effect of Multitask game-based digital therapy versus Schulte Grid digital game on attentional functioning (measured by the TOVA), ADHD symptoms, executive functioning, and clinical impairment, in children diagnosed with ADHD in China.Safety, tolerability, and compliance were also assessed.

The study will be a blinded (investigators and outcome assessors), randomized, parallel group, follow-up study of the sustained effects of 28 days of treatment with either Multitask game-based digital therapy or Schulte Grid digital game.

The trial will consist of 3 visits: Screening, FU-Day 14 visit and FU-Day 28 visit.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Shanghai Municipality
      • Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China, 201102
        • Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

6 years to 12 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age 8 years to 12 years, inclusive, at the time of parental informed consent.
  • Male or female.
  • Confirmed ADHD diagnosis , any presentation , at Screening based on DSM-V criteria and established via the MINI-KID administered by a trained clinician.
  • Screening/Baseline score on the clinician-rated ADHDRS-IV score 24.
  • Screening/Baseline score on the TOVA API -1.8.
  • Not undergoing pharmacological treatment with methylphenidate or amphetamine-based products at time of Screening ; or, if undergoing pharmacolog ical treatment , must be willing and appropriate (i.e. not optimally treated in the investigator's judgment) to wash out of current regimen.
  • Estimated IQ score~ 80 as assessed by Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children-Fourth Edition ,WISC-IV.
  • Ability to comply with all the testing and requirements.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Current, controlled (requiring a restricted medicatio n) or uncontrolled, comorbid psychiatric diagnosis , based on MINI-KID and subsequent clinical interviewing, with significant symptoms including but not limited to post-traumatic stress disorder , psychosis, bipolar illness, pervasive developmental disorder, severe obsessive compulsive disorder, severe depressive or severe anxiety disorder , conduct disorder , or other symptomatic manifestatio ns that in the opinion of the Investigator may confound study data/assessments .
  • Children who are currently at risk of suicide or have attempted suicide; children who have a history of suicide or are currently exhibiting active suicidal ideation or self-harm.
  • Unable to stop taking ADHD medication.
  • Motor condition (e.g., physical deformity of the hands/arms ; prostheses) that prevents playing the digital therapy as reported by the parent or observed by the investigator .
  • Recent history (within the past 6 months) of suspected substance abuse or dependence.
  • History of seizures (exclusive of febr ile seizures) , or significant motor or vocal tics, including but not limited to Tourette 's Disorder.
  • Diagnosis of or parent-reported color blindness.
  • Uncorrected visual acuity (Confirmed in-clinic via ability of subject to play the game).
  • With severe mental retardation.
  • Any other medical condition that in the opinion of the investigato r may confound study data/assessments.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Multitask game-based digital therapy
Multitask game-based digital therapy group will be asked to practice multitask-game on the system for approximately 25 minutes/day at least 5 days a week. Compliance will be monitored electronically.
To practice multitask-game on the system for approximately 25 minutes/day at least 5 days a week.
Active Comparator: Schulte Grid digital game
Schulte Grid digital game group will be asked to practice Schulte Grid digital game on the system for approximately 25 minutes/day at least 5 days a week. Compliance will be monitored electronically.
To practice Schulte Grid digital game on the system for approximately 25 minutes/day at least 5 days a week.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
the TOVA API
Time Frame: Baseline

The primary outcome measure was the mean change in The Attention Performance Index (API) of TOVA. The TOVA is a validated, computerised, continuous performance test that objectively measures attention and inhibitory control, normalised by age and sex.

The API is calculated from variability, response time, and d' (D Prime) using the following formula: API = Response Time Z score (Half 1) + d' Z score (Half 2) + Variability Z score (Total) + 1.80

API tells how similar the score is to the ADHD profile. A score of less than 0 indicates that the subject had similar performance to a normative ADHD population. A lower score indicates a more severe ADHD profile.

Baseline
the TOVA API
Time Frame: 14 days after enrollment

The primary outcome measure was the mean change in The Attention Performance Index (API) of TOVA. The TOVA is a validated, computerised, continuous performance test that objectively measures attention and inhibitory control, normalised by age and sex.

The API is calculated from variability, response time, and d' (D Prime) using the following formula: API = Response Time Z score (Half 1) + d' Z score (Half 2) + Variability Z score (Total) + 1.80

API tells how similar the score is to the ADHD profile. A score of less than 0 indicates that the subject had similar performance to a normative ADHD population. A lower score indicates a more severe ADHD profile.

14 days after enrollment
the TOVA API
Time Frame: 28 days after enrollment

The primary outcome measure was the mean change in The Attention Performance Index (API) of TOVA. The TOVA is a validated, computerised, continuous performance test that objectively measures attention and inhibitory control, normalised by age and sex.

The API is calculated from variability, response time, and d' (D Prime) using the following formula: API = Response Time Z score (Half 1) + d' Z score (Half 2) + Variability Z score (Total) + 1.80

API tells how similar the score is to the ADHD profile. A score of less than 0 indicates that the subject had similar performance to a normative ADHD population. A lower score indicates a more severe ADHD profile.

28 days after enrollment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The ADHD-Rating Scale
Time Frame: Baseline
The ADHD-Rating Scale is an 18-item scale assessing the frequency of each ADHD symptom based on DSM-IV criteria. The scale consists of 2 subscales: inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (9 items). Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (rarely or never) to 3 (very often) with total scores ranging from 0-54. A higher score indicates more severe ADHD symptoms and behaviors.
Baseline
The ADHD-Rating Scale
Time Frame: 14 days after enrollment
The ADHD-Rating Scale is an 18-item scale assessing the frequency of each ADHD symptom based on DSM-IV criteria. The scale consists of 2 subscales: inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (9 items). Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (rarely or never) to 3 (very often) with total scores ranging from 0-54. A higher score indicates more severe ADHD symptoms and behaviors.
14 days after enrollment
The ADHD-Rating Scale
Time Frame: 28 days after enrollment
The ADHD-Rating Scale is an 18-item scale assessing the frequency of each ADHD symptom based on DSM-IV criteria. The scale consists of 2 subscales: inattention (9 items) and hyperactivity-impulsivity (9 items). Each item is scored on a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (rarely or never) to 3 (very often) with total scores ranging from 0-54. A higher score indicates more severe ADHD symptoms and behaviors.
28 days after enrollment
The Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 14 days after enrollment

The Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician's comparison of the participant's overall clinical condition at follow up to the overall clinical condition at baseline. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale where 1 = Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, and 7=Very much worse.

A score of 1, 2, or 3 would indicate overall improvement of ADHD severity.

14 days after enrollment
The Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I)
Time Frame: 28 days after enrollment

The Clinical Global Impression Scale - Improvement (CGI-I) is a clinician's comparison of the participant's overall clinical condition at follow up to the overall clinical condition at baseline. The CGI-S is a 7-point scale where 1 = Very much improved, 2=Much improved, 3=Minimally improved, 4=No change, 5=Minimally worse, 6=Much worse, and 7=Very much worse.

A score of 1, 2, or 3 would indicate overall improvement of ADHD severity.

28 days after enrollment
BRIEF Inhibit Percentile
Time Frame: Baseline

The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is a parent-rated form that assesses everyday behavior associated with specific domains of the executive functions of their child. The BRIEF working memory metacognition subscale measures the participants ability to hold information when completing a task in a sequential manner.

A lower subscale score indicates better ability of working memory.

Baseline
BRIEF Inhibit Percentile
Time Frame: 14 days after enrollment

The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is a parent-rated form that assesses everyday behavior associated with specific domains of the executive functions of their child. The BRIEF working memory metacognition subscale measures the participants ability to hold information when completing a task in a sequential manner.

A lower subscale score indicates better ability of working memory.

14 days after enrollment
BRIEF Inhibit Percentile
Time Frame: 28 days after enrollment

The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF) is a parent-rated form that assesses everyday behavior associated with specific domains of the executive functions of their child. The BRIEF working memory metacognition subscale measures the participants ability to hold information when completing a task in a sequential manner.

A lower subscale score indicates better ability of working memory.

28 days after enrollment
Adverse Device Effects
Time Frame: 14 days after enrollment
The expectedness of an ADE shall be documented in case Report Form(CRF). 1. Dizziness,2. Nausea,3. Headache,4. Increased and unusual levels of frustration during game play.
14 days after enrollment
Adverse Device Effects
Time Frame: 28 days after enrollment
The expectedness of an ADE shall be documented in case Report Form(CRF). 1. Dizziness,2. Nausea,3. Headache,4. Increased and unusual levels of frustration during game play.
28 days after enrollment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Daqian Zhu, PhD, Department of Psychological Medicine, Children's Hospital of Fudan University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 16, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 23, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 27, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 24, 2026

Last Verified

March 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder

Clinical Trials on Multitask game-based digital therapy

Subscribe