NUTritional Impact of a Hypocaloric Hyperprotein Diet Before Obesity Surgery (NUTRACOB)

September 16, 2025 updated by: University Hospital, Rouen

Obesity is a major public health problem and is constantly on the rise. Therapeutic approaches based on dietary advice, physical activity and the management of psychological difficulties are not always sufficient to achieve a lasting weight reduction.

Bariatric surgery (or obesity surgery), accompanied by therapeutic education and adequate medical and dietary monitoring, can lead to significant and lasting weight loss. It is indicated as a second-line treatment for patients who have failed medical treatment, whose BMI is greater than or equal to 40 or whose BMI is greater than or equal to 35 with comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, severe joint disorders).

The surgeon may be very bothered by the intra-abdominal fat mass and especially by steatotic hepatomegaly (increase in the size of the liver and its fat load).

Faced with this problem, various preoperative strategies such as the placement of an intra gastric balloon have been tried to decrease the size of the liver but a systematic review from 2016 indicates that a low calorie diet is preferable. Preoperative weight loss can reduce fat load and liver volume very rapidly. This meta-analysis shows that all low-calorie, high-protein diets are effective and that the optimal duration (4 weeks), compliance and tolerance are important factors for success.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obesity is a major public health problem and is constantly on the rise. Therapeutic approaches based on dietary advice, physical activity and the management of psychological difficulties are not always sufficient to achieve a lasting weight reduction.

Bariatric surgery (or obesity surgery), accompanied by therapeutic education and adequate medical and dietary monitoring, can lead to significant and lasting weight loss. It is indicated as a second-line treatment for patients who have failed medical treatment, whose BMI is greater than or equal to 40 or whose BMI is greater than or equal to 35 with comorbidities (type 2 diabetes, arterial hypertension, obstructive sleep apnoea-hypopnoea syndrome, severe joint disorders).

The surgeon may be very bothered by the intra-abdominal fat mass and especially by steatotic hepatomegaly (increase in the size of the liver and its fat load).

Faced with this problem, various preoperative strategies such as the placement of an intra gastric balloon have been tried to decrease the size of the liver but a systematic review from 2016 indicates that a low calorie diet is preferable. Preoperative weight loss can reduce fat load and liver volume very rapidly. This meta-analysis shows that all low-calorie, high-protein diets are effective and that the optimal duration (4 weeks), compliance and tolerance are important factors for success.

However, there is no consensus on the benefit/risk balance of a preoperative diet and there is considerable variability in approach at national and international level.

The present clinical study involves a triad of dietician, surgeon, physician (endocrinologist/nutritionist or internist) to secure this diet. It could provide a database to help estimate the risk of undernutrition in the obese subject.

This diet, designed to facilitate the surgical procedure and potentially reduce intraoperative complications, is inexpensive, easily accessible and reproducible by other teams. This innovative management could standardise the preoperative management of patients undergoing bariatric surgery at national level. It would also improve the results of bariatric surgery both in the short term by reducing complications and in the long term by increasing weight reduction as reported in the Livhits meta-analysis. The risk of undernutrition should be reduced by this hypocaloric hyperprotein diet and consequently cancel out the increased risk of mortality, infections, delayed healing, longer hospital stay and the costs that this would entail.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 65 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient eligible for bariatric surgery (according to HAS criteria) whose sleeve gastrectomy is scheduled
  • Patient with morbid obesity (BMI ≥ 40)
  • Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 65 years
  • Haemoglobinemia ≥ 12 g/dL in men and ≥ 11 g/dL in women
  • Patient speaking and understanding French
  • Adult having read and understood the information letter and signed the consent form
  • Woman of childbearing age with effective / very effective contraception (Cf. CTFG) (estrogen-progestin or intrauterine device or tubal ligation) prior to surgery and a negative -HCG blood pregnancy test at inclusion, for the duration of the study
  • Postmenopausal woman: confirmatory diagnosis (non-medically induced amenorrhoea for at least 12 months prior to the inclusion visit)
  • Patient affiliated with, or beneficiary of a social security (health insurance) category

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindication to bariatric surgery detected during the preoperative assessment
  • Medical contraindication to a restrictive diet
  • Type I or II insulin-requiring diabetes
  • Severe renal insufficiency defined by a blood filtration rate < 30 mL/min
  • Person wearing a pacemaker or any other implant with the same functions (cochlear implant, bladder battery, etc.)
  • Person deprived of liberty by an administrative or judicial decision or person placed under judicial protection / sub-guardianship or curatorship
  • A history of illness or psychological or sensory abnormality likely to prevent the subject from fully understanding the conditions required for participation in the protocol or to prevent him/her from giving informed consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: With diet
A low-calorie, high-protein diet will be prescribed to the patient for a period of 4 weeks. The diet will be done the 4 weeks before the bariatric surgery
A low-calorie, high-protein diet will be prescribed to the patient for a period of 4 weeks. The diet will be done the 4 weeks before the bariatric surgery
Other: Without diet
A low-calorie, high-protein diet will not be prescribed to the patient for a period of 4 weeks.
A low-calorie, high-protein diet will not be prescribed to the patient for a period of 4 weeks.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Poor diet tolerance
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet

At least one of the following biological abnormalities at the end of the diet period:

  • Lymphopenia acquired during the diet
  • Anemia (Hb<11g/dL for men Hb<10g/dL for women) or a decrease in hemoglobin of more than 2 g/dL
  • Onset or worsening of vitamin B1 deficiency from baseline (Vit B1 < 78 nmol/L)

OR

At least one of the following clinical abnormalities:

  • Decrease in muscle strength (difference in muscle strength measured with a HandGrip at Visit 2 and Visit 3) greater than three standard deviations from the matched Visit 3 - visit 2 differences of the control group after removal of measurement bias on a log-transformed strength variable, associated with weight loss > 5% in 1 month or a decrease in percent lean mass ≥ 1% relative to visit 2
  • Any permanent discontinuation
4 weeks after the beggining of the diet

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Weight loss
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet and 3 months postoperatively
Weight difference between Visit 3 and Visit 2
4 weeks after the beggining of the diet and 3 months postoperatively
Reduced muscle strength
Time Frame: 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet
Difference in muscle strength measured with a HandGrip at Visit 2 and Visit 3)
4 weeks after the beggining of the diet
Comparison of the quality of life between "with diet" and "without diet" with "EQVOD" questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet and 3 months postoperatively
Evaluated using the EQVOD questionnaire at baseline (V2), end of diet (V3) and 3 months postoperatively Score from 36 to 180
Baseline, 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet and 3 months postoperatively
Evolution of physical activity
Time Frame: Baseline, 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet and 3 months postoperatively
Physical activity evaluated using the Ricci et Gagnon questionnaire at baseline (V2), end of diet (V3) and 3 months postoperatively
Baseline, 4 weeks after the beggining of the diet and 3 months postoperatively
Digestive tolerance
Time Frame: during the 4 weeks of the diet
Digestive tolerance evaluated using auto-questionnaire about nausea, vomiting, diarrhoea, constipation forthe interventional group, in the month of the diet
during the 4 weeks of the diet
Compliance
Time Frame: during the 4 weeks of the diet
Evaluated by a food diary and the full bottles (not consumed) brought back for the intervention group, in the month of the diet
during the 4 weeks of the diet
Degree of exposure
Time Frame: one day from surgery
Assessment of the degree of exposure of the oesogastric junction and hepatomegaly on a subjective scale of 1 to 5 by the surgeon
one day from surgery
Operating time
Time Frame: one day from surgery
Number of hours and minuts about surgery
one day from surgery
Length of hospital stay
Time Frame: Four months from surgery
Number of days in hospital for the surgery
Four months from surgery
Intraoperative and postoperative complications
Time Frame: Between surgery and 3 months postoperatively
Delayed healing, infection and cancellation of surgery or conversion to laparotomy) up to 3 months post-operatively
Between surgery and 3 months postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 9, 2023

Primary Completion (Estimated)

November 20, 2026

Study Completion (Estimated)

March 20, 2027

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 11, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 18, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

June 28, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 22, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 16, 2025

Last Verified

September 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe