Concurrent Training on the Performance of Team Sports Athletes

Effectiveness of Concurrent Training on the Performance of Team Sports Athletes

This study will add to the existing pool of knowledge with more appropriate sample size. The main purpose will be to provide coaches with a practical proposal for concurrent training(CT) to improve athletes' performance in mixed type sports and team sports. This study, therefore, will test the aspects of CT by evaluating and comparing the training adaptations induced by three forms of strength training modes in CT. One mode will be of Heavy-Resistance training where athlete will perform exercise with 80-90% of their 1RM. Second mode will be of Contrast-Strength training that will alternate the use of heavy and light resistance exercises and third mode will be Elastic Resistance Training. In the present study, these three strength protocols will be balanced for sequence of exercise, volume, duration, and other variables, so that the protocols differed only in the intensity of strength training. Comparing their training adaptations therefore will enable evaluation of the role of different forms of strength training in CT outcomes on performance.

Study Overview

• Status: Completed
• Conditions: Sports Physical Therapy
• Intervention / Treatment: Other: Heavy resistance training; Other: Contrast strength training; Other: Elastic resistance training

Detailed Description

Sports performance is influenced by the interaction of several physical variables. For this reason, most sports need both strength and endurance capacities to maximize overall performance. Therefore, a combination of resistance and aerobic training, usually called concurrent training (CT), has been used recently as a way of simultaneously improving strength and aerobic performances according to the needs of a specific sport. This combination can be challenging and can influence training adaptations, being a problematic issue for coaches. Several investigators report that combined or concurrent training (CT), in which strength and aerobic endurance training are included in the same training sessions or program, interferes with the development of muscle strength or power. Reduction in strength adaptations from CT could result from neuromuscular fatigue induced by concurrent aerobic endurance exercise, which could limit the maximal muscle force that can be produced during resistance training. A converse reduction in aerobic capacity from concurrent training has seldom been reported. The reduction in strength adaptations from concurrent strength and aerobic endurance training has been termed the interference effect or phenomenon.

In contrast to interference, several investigators report compatibility of strength and endurance training, i.e., no reduction in strength adaptations from concurrent strength and aerobic endurance training. In sports applications, concurrent training has been reported to increase diverse measures of performance in basketball players, competitive rowers, endurance runners, soccer players, professional handball players, and competitive cyclists. These findings suggest that in athletes, at least, concurrent strength and aerobic endurance training has complimentary or synergic effects, rather than the contradictory or antagonistic effects implied by interference.

Therefore, clarifying the concurrent training effects is necessary and will have implications for medicine, science, sports, and recreational exercise. In sports, effects of CT i.e. interference or synergy are crucial to exercise physiologists, coaches, trainers, and athletes, who invest substantial time and resources to maximize training adaptations and competitive efficiency. Confirmation of synergy effect of CT, in contrast, could lead to more efficient athletic training protocols.

Although, some researches have de-emphasized aerobics in resistance training programs, for example, bodybuilders have portrayed aerobics as counterproductive to resistance training adaptations. On the contrary, however, several United States national certifying, training, and medical organizations recommend CT to maximize the benefits of exercise at all levels, including the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM), the American Diabetes Association (ADA), and the National Strength and Conditioning Association (NSCA).

• Study Type: Interventional
• Enrollment (Actual): 48
• Phase: Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

Study Locations

• Pakistan
  • Punjab
    • Rawalpindi, Punjab, Pakistan, 46000
      • Army Heritage Foundation (AHF), Ayub National Park

Participation Criteria

Eligibility Criteria

• Ages Eligible for Study: 14 years to 25 years (Child, Adult)
• Accepts Healthy Volunteers: No
• Genders Eligible for Study: Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

• Male athletes.
• Athletes participating in team sports.
• Those who have been new to the training and the duration of training period are not more than 03 months.

Exclusion Criteria:

• Experiencing symptoms from musculoskeletal injuries to the lower extremity.
• Any systemic pathology.
• Recent surgery.
• Participating in any other high strength/power training program during last 4 weeks of this time period.

Study Plan

How is the study designed?

Design Details

• Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
• Allocation: Randomized
• Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
• Masking: Single

Number of Arms

3

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm	Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Heavy resistance training; Group A	Other: Heavy resistance training; Their training program included 4 resistance exercises with heavy weight lifting of the leg muscles. 3 sets of 6-8 repetitions of 80-90 % of maximal load were performed with a barbell squat (range of 0 to 90º knee flexion), lying leg curl, seated calf raises, and leg extension. The rests between the sets and the exercises lasted 5 minutes.
Experimental: Contrast strength training; Group B	Other: Contrast strength training; Their resistance training program contained the same exercises as the high resistance training group, but with different intensity. Athlete performed each exercise for the first time with 5-7 reps with 80 % of the 1RM load followed by 15-20 reps with 40 % of the maximal load to complete the 3 sets for each exercise. The rest period between series was 60 seconds and the rest period between exercises was 5 minutes. For example, 5 heavy barbell squats followed immediately by 20 squat with lighter weight to complete 3 sets.
Active Comparator: Elastic resistance training; Group C	Other: Elastic resistance training; During the intervention, the group conducted a 'elastic resistance training' with the same muscle groups. External resistance was provided by blue thera-band latex-free exercise bands in this training. Each exercise was performed three times for a total of 15-25 repetitions. In between sets, a 5-minute rest period was given and there was a 25-second rest period in between exercise performance. The intensity of each exercise was increased with the black thera band at the midpoint (start of week 7) of the training. The following figure shows the resistance of the blue and black bands to 100 percent elongation. Following figure shows the resistance offered by blue and black band at 100% elongation.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure	Measure Description	Time Frame
Vertical height jump test	The vertical jump test measures the power of lower-body. The athlete stands horizontally against a wall and reaches out with the hand nearest to the wall for the test. The point of the extended arm's fingertips is marked when holding the feet flat on the ground. This is the height at which you can hit while standing. The athlete then takes a step away from the wall and jumps as far as possible upwards, using both arms and legs to help move the body upwards. The attempt to touch the wall at the top of the jump is recorded again. The score is the difference in distance between the two reaching heights. The best of three attempts is recorded. It is also a valid (r=0.95) and reliable tool (r=0.97). Measure the height of your highest jump and then subtract your height from highest jump in cm/inch.	6th week
1 Repetition Maximum (1RM)	Athletes are first advised to warm up with a light resistance that allows for 5-10 repetitions with ease. After a 1-minute rest time, a new load is determined by adding 10-20% to the warm-up load, which should allow for 3-5 repetitions. Estimate a near-maximum load that would allow for 2-3 repetitions after a 2-minute rest time by adding 10-20 percent again.	6th week
505 Agility test	The 505 Agility test assess your ability to turn 180 degrees. As seen in the diagram, markers are positioned 5 and 15 metres apart from a line drawn on the ground. The runner runs from the 15 metre marker to the line, through the 5 metre markers, turns on the line, and runs back through the 5 metre markers (the run in distance is to build up speed). The time is taken from when the athletes run through the 5 metre marker for the first time, and it is halted when they return through these markers (that is, the time taken to cover the 5 m up and back distance - 10 m total).	6th week
Speed of Change of Direction (COD)	An athlete's change of direction can also be measured by dividing his 505 time scored by 10m, the straight line distance. Formula will be: Speed of COD (m/sec) = 10m/score of 505 test in sec	6th week
30 Meter Sprint Test	It includes running a single maximal sprint over a distance of 30 meters, taking two time trials and recording the best time to the nearest two decimal places. Start from a stationary position, one foot in front of the other. The front foot must be either on or behind the starting line. This starting position should also be retained for 2 seconds before starting and the stopwatch should be kept ready.	6th week
YMCA Sit and Reach Test	The sit and reach test is a common method to evaluate lower back and hamstring flexibility. The athlete takes off his trainers, stretches and warms up properly, and then sits with his knees straight, bisecting a yardstick. The yardstick or tap is put on the floor between the subject's knees, and the heels must not move through the 15-inch section marked as 0. The athlete's hands are straight out in front of him on top of each other, and he slowly reaches out, reaching the yardstick and holding it for two seconds. The average of two trials is noted.	6th week
Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test	The Yo-Yo test is a maximum aerobic endurance fitness test, involving running between markers 20 meters apart, at increasing speeds, until exhaustion. The Yo-Yo Intermittent Recovery Test comes in two versions: Level 1 begins at 10 km/hr and is used by younger people, and Level 2 starts at 13 km/hr.	6th week
VO2 max	It refers to the maximum amount of oxygen that can be used during exercise. It is widely used to measure aerobic endurance or cardiovascular fitness for athletes. Formula has been published to estimate VO2max (ml/min/kg) from Yo-Yo IR1 results and to obtain a fitness ranking. - Formula : VO2max (ml/min/kg) = distance run (m) × 0.0084 + 36.4	6th week

Collaborators and Investigators

• Sponsor: Riphah International University
• Investigators: Principal Investigator: Danish Latif, MSPT-SPT, Riphah International University

Study record dates

Study Major Dates

• Study Start (Actual): August 1, 2020
• Primary Completion (Actual): August 1, 2020
• Study Completion (Actual): January 31, 2021

Study Registration Dates

• First Submitted: August 5, 2021
• First Submitted That Met QC Criteria: August 5, 2021
• First Posted (Actual): August 12, 2021

Study Record Updates

• Last Update Posted (Actual): October 6, 2021
• Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria: September 29, 2021
• Last Verified: September 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

• Keywords: Physical performance; Concurrent training,; High resistance training,; Contrast strength training,; Elastic resistance training,
• Other Study ID Numbers: REC/0783 Saima Tariq

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

• Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?: No

Drug and device information, study documents

• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product: No
• Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product: No