Effects of Ladder Training Versus Plyometric

June 12, 2024 updated by: Riphah International University

Effects of Ladder Training Versus Plyometric Training Program on Agility , Speed and Power in Female Cricket Players

To determine the effects of ladder training versus plyometric training program on agility, speed and power in domestic female cricket players. Plyometric training program and ladder training program consider effective training methods for players for development of speed, agility and power.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Detailed Description

Cricket is a well-known, particularly created team sport that is played on an international scale and involves a group of eleven players. Because both baseball and cricket are played on open fields, they are comparable sports. Cricket was first thought to be a game played only by men.1, 2 However, a few years ago, the globe became aware of the female cricket game because it was becoming more and more popular worldwide. It's a game that requires both physical components and a substantial level of technical understanding. Plyometric and ladder training programmes are thought to be efficient ways to help athletes gain strength, speed, and agility. Players will be selected for this randomised clinical study by use of successive sampling. The players will be split into two groups, 1 and 2, with Group 1 receiving ladder training and Group 2 receiving plyometric training. Each group will receive three 60-minute sessions per week for eight weeks. The vertical leap test, the agility t test, and the 30-dash test will be used to examine patients before and after the trial. Software from SPSS 25 version will be used to analyse the data.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

42

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • Punjab
      • Lahore, Punjab, Pakistan, 54000
        • Recruiting
        • Riphah International University
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • • Age ranging from 18-25year.

    • Player with minimum 1- year experience of cricket Only female cricket players.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • • Any cardiopulmonary problem. Lower extremity injuries of last 6 months(fractures, ligament ruptures)

    • Players who were unable to complete ladder and plyometric training.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: ladder training
ladder training will be given to group 1

Players practiced Ladder training for 60 minutes thrice a week for 8 weeks. There are 3 different types of drills. The first types of drills are steady state drills. These drills focus on quickness Endurance and utilize a constant rhythm throughout the ladder. The second types of drills are burst drills. These drills focus on the ability to turn on rapid burst of foot movement.

The third types of drills are elastic response drills. These drills focus on improving the reactive speed components of the lower leg. A standard agility ladder is 15 feet long and 20 inches wide Step.

Active Comparator: plyometric training
plyometric training will be given to group 2
In plyometric training players practiced for 60 minutes thrice a week for 8 weeks. warm up for 15 minutes , plyometric training for 30 minutes and cool down for 15 minutes

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
vertical jump test
Time Frame: 4 week
Reaching up with the hand closest to the wall, the athlete stands side by side with the wall. Mark the point of the fingertips this is the standing reach height. The athlete then takes a step back from the wall and launches himself as high while projecting his body upward . At the top of the jump, try to make contact with the wall. The score is the difference in height between the standing reach height and the jump height.
4 week
30 dash test
Time Frame: 4 week
30-yard maximum sprint while timing oneself is part of the exam. Included in the warm-up should be some practice accelerations and starts. The front foot must to land on or behind The tester ought to offer advice on how to run as fast as possible as well as motivation to keep going over the finish line. There can be two trials. If a stopwatch is being used, the time begins at the initial movement.
4 week
T test
Time Frame: 4 week
T test measured both before and after and Athletes can test their agility by running forward, sideways, and backwards in the T-Test. Arrange four cones. At the sound of the timer, the subject begins at cone A, runs to cone B, and places their right hand on the cone's base. Next, they make a left turn, move sideways to cone C, and touch its base with their left hand once more. After that, shuffle sideways to cone D and use your right hand to contact the base. Then they run backwards to cone A and shuffle back to cone B, touching with their left hand.
4 week

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Muzna Munir, MS, Riphah International University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 15, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

June 1, 2024

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 12, 2024

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

First Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 17, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 12, 2024

Last Verified

June 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • REC/RCR&AHS/23/0485

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Sports Physical Therapy

Clinical Trials on ladder training

Subscribe