Effectiveness of a Mobile-based HIV Prevention Intervention Involving Incentive Policy for Doctors in Liangshan, China

June 6, 2022 updated by: Yu Sun, Peking University

Effectiveness of a Mobile-based HIV Prevention Intervention for Rural and Low-income Population Involving Incentive Policy for Doctors in Liangshan, China: a Randomized Controlled Trial Protocol

This study will be carried out in Liangshan Yi Autonomous Prefecture, Sichuan province, China, using a single-blinded randomized controlled trial design to measure the effects of a mobile-based HIV-related information intervention on group HIV/AIDS prevention. Village doctors will be responsible for sending the HIV-related health education information to the participants. The aim of this study is to develop a generalizable, effective, acceptable, and convenient mobile-based information intervention model to improve HIV-related knowledge, attitudes, practices, and health outcomes in poverty-stricken areas in China and measure the impact of incentive policies on the work of village doctors in Liangshan, China.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

4000

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • aged 18 years or older
  • has mobile phone with internet service
  • has and use WeChat and TikTok account regularly
  • willing to provide informed consent
  • speak Mandarin Chinese or Yi ethnic group's language

Exclusion Criteria:

  • diagnosed with psychiatric disorders
  • diagnosed with severe cognitive impairment
  • diagnosed with severe physical disabilities
  • has already attended or is currently attending another intervention program
  • plan on moving out of Liangshan in the 18-month study period

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: Triple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Mobile-based intervention with standardized incentive
Participants will receive biweekly messages containing HIV-related educational modules from village doctors who will receive standardized compensation for performing the work.
HIV/AIDS awareness-raising and behavior-related cyclic messages will be delivered by the village doctors on a biweekly basis for 18 months.
Experimental: Mobile-based intervention with performance-based incentive
Participants will receive biweekly messages containing HIV-related educational modules from village doctors who will receive performance-based compensation for performing the work.
HIV/AIDS awareness-raising and behavior-related cyclic messages will be delivered by the village doctors on a biweekly basis for 18 months.
village doctors in Intervention A and B will receive different types of monetary compensation. Doctors in Intervention A will receive standardized compensation for completing their assigned tasks. Doctors in Intervention B will receive performance-based compensation whose amount depends on how well the participants perform on the follow-up questionnaires.
No Intervention: Control without intervention
Participants will not receive the mobile-based intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
HIV-related knowledge improvement
Time Frame: 18 months
Result will be obtained by calculating weighted scores for the indicators in the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire 18 (HIV-KQ-18) to represent the participants' and their family members' level of knowledge measured by the baseline and follow-up questionnaires. The HIV-KQ-18 is a self-administered 18-item questionnaire; the possible scores range from 0 to 18, with 0-9 representing low HIV-related knowledge and 10-18 representing high HIV-related knowledge.
18 months
Comparison of the effectiveness of different financial compensations
Time Frame: 18 months
The research team will compare the two interventions to determine what type of financial reward, standardized compensation or participant performance-based compensation, is more effective at incentivizing village doctors to deliver and promote the intervention content.
18 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Effectiveness of secondary knowledge transmission: HIV-related knowledge improvement of the participants' family members
Time Frame: 18 months
The research team will examine the path of secondary knowledge transmission to the participants' family members by having the family members complete the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire 18 (HIV-KQ-18). The HIV-KQ-18 is a self-administered 18-item questionnaire; the possible scores range from 0 to 18, with 0-9 representing low HIV-related knowledge and 10-18 representing high HIV-related knowledge.
18 months
Behavioral changes: condom use
Time Frame: 18 months
Assess the changes in participants' condom use via the Condoms Use Self-Efficacy Scale (CUSES), a 28-item self-reporting questionnaire using a 5-point scale scoring system in which 0 represents strongly disagree and 4 represents strongly agree.
18 months
Behavioral changes: substance use
Time Frame: 18 months
Assess the severity, frequency and change of participants' substance use via the Drug and Abuse Screening Test (DAST), a 10-item questionnaire with scores range from 0 to 10; 0-2 representing low substance use and 9-10 representing severe substance use.
18 months
Health outcomes: HIV prevalence
Time Frame: 18 months
Will be collecting regional data on HIV prevalence through collaboration with local departments.
18 months
Health outcomes: mental health
Time Frame: 18 months
Assessed via the use of the Primary Care Evaluation of Mental Disorders (PRIME-MD) patient questionnaire, a self-reporting questionnaire consisting of 26 yes/no questions about the presence of various symptoms of different mental disorders.
18 months
Health outcomes: all-cause mortality
Time Frame: 18 months
Will be collecting regional data on all-cause mortality through collaboration with local departments.
18 months
Social factors: quality of life
Time Frame: 18 months
Measured via the use of EQ-5D-3L, a questionnaire comprised of 5 questions and a visual analogue scale to assess the participants' health-related quality of life. Each question has three possible answers corresponding to three levels of perceived problems. Level 1 indicates no problem and level 3 indicates extreme problems. The visual analogue scale is numbered from 0 to 100, with 0 representing "the worst health you can imagine" and 100 representing "the best health you can imagine"
18 months
Social factors: stigma towards HIV
Time Frame: 18 months
Assessed via the use of the Internalized AIDS-Related Stigma Scale, a 6-item scale that offers a binary (yes/no) response to every item and the scores is computed as the sums of the items with 6 representing high stigmatization and 0 representing low stigmatization.
18 months
Social factors: perception of social support
Time Frame: 18 months
Assess participants' social support in the community via the use of the Medical Outcomes Study Social Support Survey (MOS-SS), a self-reporting 19-item survey. The mean score of the 19 items will be calculated and transferred onto a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating more support.
18 months
Retention of HIV-related knowledge
Time Frame: 18 months
Measured by the HIV Knowledge Questionnaire 18 (HIV-KQ-18). The research team will ask all participants to complete the questionnaire every six months after the intervention period and compare their new scores with their previous score to examine their ability to recall information from the educational modules. The HIV-KQ-18 is a self-administered 18-item questionnaire; the possible scores range from 0 to 18, with 0-9 representing low HIV-related knowledge and 10-18 representing high HIV-related knowledge.
18 months
Feasibility: participants' use of social media applications
Time Frame: 18 months
Feasibility of the intervention will be calculated by dividing the number of people who can use WeChat and TikTok by the total number of people living in the area.
18 months
Level of engagement
Time Frame: 18 months
Measured by an original engagement and attendance scale. Participants will choose from a range 1 to 6, with 1 representing non-engaging and 6 representing highly engaging.
18 months
Study's acceptability and satisfaction
Time Frame: 18 months
Assessed via an original 15-item questionnaire with rating scales (6 is Highly Satisfied and 1 is Highly Unsatisfied). Participants will be asked to rate and provide feedback on the intervention's content and method, including the effectiveness of the HIV-related knowledge modules, the time and method of information delivery, village doctors' attitude and competence, the design of the entire experimental intervention process, and more.
18 months
Cost-effectiveness of the intervention:
Time Frame: 18 months
Data on the intervention's direct and indirect costs will be collected. Direct cost involves labor costs, research-related travel expenses, and village doctors' and participants' financial compensations. Indirect cost consists of the expenses on cell phone internet data. The date will then be used to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of both interventions.
18 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Guoen Liu, Peking University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2023

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2025

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 24, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 14, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

August 20, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 9, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 6, 2022

Last Verified

June 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on HIV/AIDS

Clinical Trials on Mobile-based HIV-related educational message delivery

Subscribe