Comparaison Between MRI Alone or Combined With Positron Emission Tomography for Brain Metastasis Diagnosis (ITIRR)

Differentiation Between Radionecrosis and Tumor Recurrence for Post-stereotactic Radiosurgery Follow-up by Pharmacokinetic Analyses in Perfusion MRI and Positron Emission Tomography

During gamma scalpel treatment of brain tumors and metastases, a follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan is performed. The radiologist who reviews the MRI assesses whether there is an increase in signal at the tumor site. This increase potentially indicates that the treatment was not effective. However, in 25% of cases (one in four people), this signal enhancement is not due to ineffective treatment, but to inflammation (swelling/damage) and tissue death around the tumor. This is why when an increase in signal is detected, additional follow-up is essential. The standard additional follow-up has an accuracy of about 83%.

This is an observational study on patients with brain metastatis comparing MRI alone or combined to PET-FET to improve accuracy of diagnosis of metastasis recurrence.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

40

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Quebec
      • Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada, J1H 5N4
        • CIUSSS de l'Estrie-CHUS

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Adults with brain metastases undergoing MRI

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male or female over 18 years of age;
  • Having undergone gamma knife radiosurgery for brain metastasis;
  • Presenting for a first MRI follow-up (Cohort C1);
  • Presence of one or more brain metastases with increased enhancement on follow-up MRI (Cohort C2.1 and C2.2); A participant recruited for Cohort C1 could be recruited for follow-up in Cohort C2.1 or C2.2 if the MRI result is ambiguous.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding;
  • Other condition that may influence the imaging result;
  • Renal impairment (<30 mL/min/1.73 m2). This threshold is consistent with recent RAC recommendations; Note: For participants with intermediate renal clearance (30-60 mL/min/1.73 m2), the total gadobutrol dose injected is set at the manufacturer's recommended clinical dose. For patients with renal clearance greater than 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, a dose of 1.5x the normal dose is used. These dose values have been approved by Dr. Chénard and are consistent with the RAC recommendations.
  • Inability to maintain supine position for the required duration (variable, depending on the sequence);
  • Patients who have previously received full brain irradiation;
  • Patients who are claustrophobic and cannot tolerate insertion into the MRI scanner;

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Comparison of novel MRI method with current MRI exam method
Time Frame: Following MRI exam
In the context of differentiating radionecrosis and recurrence of metastasis: Is our new method better than the actual standard of care in Sherbrooke?
Following MRI exam
Comparison of DCE-MRI method with FET PET
Time Frame: Following MRI exam
In the context of differentiating radionecrosis and recurrence of metastasis: is one better than the other? And Can DCE-MRI and FET PET be combined to differentiate between recurrence/radionecrosis?
Following MRI exam

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

November 23, 2017

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

February 13, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 15, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 15, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

October 27, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 23, 2024

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2024

Last Verified

August 1, 2024

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Metastases, Adult

Subscribe