The Cohort for Patient-reported Outcomes, Imaging and Trial Inclusion in Metastatic BRAin Disease (COIMBRA) (COIMBRA)

August 31, 2022 updated by: Joost J.C. Verhoeff, UMC Utrecht

The incidence of brain metastases is expected to increase because of better treatments of primary tumours. Novel diagnostic and therapeutic techniques are continuously being developed, all of which need thorough evaluation before they can be implemented in clinical routine. Randomized Controlled Trials are the gold standard to do so, but they have shown many challenges, especially when applied in a cancer setting.

.The 'cohort multiple Randomized Controlled Trial (cmRCT)' design is a promising design for multiple (simultaneous) randomized evaluations of experimental interventions, with potential for increased recruitment, comparability and long-term outcomes as a standard. This design will speed up the process of translating treatment innovations to the daily clinic.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The COIMBRA cohort is a prospective cohort, which will serve as a facility for efficient, systematic and simultaneous evaluation of new interventions and MRI sequences and prospective outcome studies (including prediction modelling).

COIMBRA patients will be followed prospectively and information on survival, symptoms, QoL (patient and caregiver), cognition, toxicity and daily functioning in relation to treatment will be collected prospectively.

Patients will receive the regular optimal clinical care according to the current guidelines when not participating in cmRCT's.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

1000

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Utrecht, Netherlands, 3508GA
        • Recruiting
        • University Medical Center Utrecht
        • Contact:
        • Contact:
        • Sub-Investigator:
          • Fia F Cialdella, MD
        • Principal Investigator:
          • Joost JC Verhoeff, MD, PhD

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients who are referred to the Department of Radiotherapy for treatment of brain metastases or for prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) will be asked to participate in this cohort study.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Either radiographic and/or histologic proof of metastatic brain disease, or eligible for prophylactic cranial irradiation;
  • Referred to the Department of Radiotherapy for cranial irradiation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Mental disorder or cognitive dysfunction that hinder the patient's ability to understand the informed consent procedure and/or study details;
  • Patients with severe psychiatric disorders;
  • Inability to understand the Dutch language.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Cohort
  • Time Perspectives: Prospective

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Survival
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Survival of participating patients will be recorded using the follow up questionnaires (returned by family members) or are derived from the Municipal Personal Records Database (in Dutch: Basisregistratie Personen (BRP))
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Time and Type of re-intervention
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Re-intervention (re-irradiation, surgery, other); Development of neurological symptoms; Development of new metastases.
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in toxicity after radiotherapy
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
The toxicity will be reported by using the serious adverse event (SAE) questionnaire, every 6 months
Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Technical and treatment data
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Dose, fractions and technique of radiotherapy. All other planned and/or received treatment for brain metastases and primary tumour (i.e. systemic therapy, surgery, radiotherapy), and the characteristics there of (type, dose, duration, awake surgery, extent of surgery, complications)

- Use of epileptic drugs, including type and dose

Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in patient reported outcomes; general quality of life
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

General quality of life will be reported by the questionnaires named C30 and EQ-5D. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) is the instrument most frequently used to measure quality of life in cancer patients, whereas the EQ-5D is widely used to measure and evaluate general health status.

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy is completed. Both the total score of the questionnaires and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in patient reported outcomes; cancer related fatigue
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Cancer related fatigue is measured by using the MFI-20 questionnaire. The MFI-20 is a 20-item self-report instrument designed to measure fatigue. It covers the following dimensions: general fatigue, physical fatigue, reduced activity, reduced motivation and mental fatigue. The instrument was used in a Dutch and Scottish sample of cancer patients receiving radiotherapy

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy is completed. Both the total score of the questionnaires and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in patient reported outcomes; depression and anxiety
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Cancer related depression and anxiety is reported by the HADS. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment questionnaire that has been found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of anxiety and depression in the setting of hospital outpatient clinic. The HADS questionnaire has seven items each for depression and anxiety subscales. Scoring for each item ranges from zero to three, with three denoting highest anxiety or depression level. A total subscale score of >8 points out of a possible 21 denotes considerable symptoms of anxiety or depression.

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy is completed. Both the total score of the questionnaire and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in patient reported outcomes; disease-specific symptoms of brain metastases and (adverse) effects of their treatment
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Disease-specific symptoms of brain metastases and (adverse) effects of their treatment are measured by a combination of questionnaires: BN20 and CFQ. The BN20 scoring transforms 20 questions into 11 scales to assess neurological deficits (visual disorder, motor dysfunction, communication deficit), future uncertainty, and disease- and treatment-related symptoms.

The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) is used in ergonomics research to measure behavioural problems associated with attentiveness and memory in everyday life.

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy is completed.Both the total scores of each neurological deficit and cognitive failure and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in caregiver reported outcomes: general quality of life
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

General quality of life will be reported by the questionnaire EQ-5D. The EQ-5D is widely used to measure and evaluate general health status.

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy of the patient is completed. Both the total score of the questionnaire and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in caregiver reported outcomes: depression and anxiety
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

Depression and anxiety is reported by the HADS. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-assessment questionnaire that has been found to be a reliable instrument for detecting states of anxiety and depression in the setting of hospital outpatient clinic. The HADS questionnaire has seven items each for depression and anxiety subscales. Scoring for each item ranges from zero to three, with three denoting highest anxiety or depression level. A total subscale score of >8 points out of a possible 21 denotes considerable symptoms of anxiety or depression.

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy of the patient is completed. Both the total score of the questionnaire and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Change in the caregiver burden
Time Frame: Through study completion, an average of 1 year

The Caregiver Strain Index (CSI) is a tool that can be used to quickly identify families with potential caregiving concerns. It is a 13-question tool that measures strain related to care provision. There is at least one item for each of the following major domains: Employment, Financial, Physical, Social and Time. Positive responses to seven or more items on the index indicate a greater level of strain. This instrument can be used to assess individuals of any age who have assumed the role of caregiver for an older adult.

Baseline, at 1 month, 3 months, and every subsequent 3 months, after initial radiotherapy of the patient is completed. Both the total score of the questionnaire and the individual questions are used in which we look at the difference between the measurement moments.

Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Patients coping and personality
Time Frame: Baseline
Patients are asked to fill out the Utrechtse Coping Lijst (UCL) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)
Baseline
Caregiver coping and personality
Time Frame: Baseline
Caregivers are asked to fill out the Utrechtse Coping Lijst (UCL) and the NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI)
Baseline
Neurocognitive functioning
Time Frame: We are testing this twice: once before radiotherapy and 3 months after radiotherapy

The neuro cognitive assessment (NCA) tests that focus on the specific cognitive domains that are most sensitive to the effects of brain irradiation are used for measuring the neurocognitive functioning.

The following domains are tested: general cognitive functioning, memory, language, executive functioning, attention, psychomotor speed, fine motor coordination, visuoconstruction, visuoperception, and social cognition. The test battery takes a maximum of 90 minutes to administer and is based upon international standards

We are testing this twice: once before radiotherapy and 3 months after radiotherapy

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Joost JC Verhoeff, MD, PhD, UMC Utrecht

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

April 26, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2024

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2026

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 23, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

March 4, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

September 6, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 31, 2022

Last Verified

August 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

Undecided

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Brain Metastases, Adult

3
Subscribe