Effect of Combined Use of an Allograft and Membrane on the Healing Outcome of Apicomarginal Defects

Effect of Combined Use of an Allograft and a Membrane on the Healing Outcome of Apicomarginal Defects Using 2D and 3D Evaluation

Healing of apicomarginal defects using 2 different groups, one being treated with the use of an allograft and a membrane and a control group, will be assessed and compared using 2D and 3D criteria. Also,quality of life will be compared between the two groups.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Periapical surgery is a viable treatment option in teeth with persistent apical periodontitis, especially in cases which fail to heal by non surgical treatment. Kim and Kratchman classified periradicular lesions into categories A-F. Lesions A-C are of endodontic origin without any periodontal pockets and vary with respect to the size of periapical radiolucency while D-F are combined endodontic - periodontal origin and are ranked accoding to the magnitude of periodontal breakdown. Type F defects are commonly referred to as apicomarginal defects and have worst prognosis among all. The lower success rate is attributed to the apical migration of junctional epithelium and intrusion of non osteogenic connective tissue into the periapical region.

Various resorbable and non resorbable collagen membrane with or without xenograft, allograft and alloplastic materials have been used in different studies. Although animal studies have reported high success rates with the use of bone graft materials and membranes over the controls but no human study till date has evaluated or compared the effect of using an allograft and membrane versus Control.

Thus, the aim of the present study is to investigate to two hypothesis. The first null hypothesis stated that there would be no difference between quality of life and healing outcome of periapical defects with periodontal communications following surgery using membrane with allograft and the conventional control group utilizing no GTR technique. The second null hypothesis stated that there would be no difference in outcome derived from the assessment of 2D periapical radiographs and 3D CBCT imaging.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

30

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Haryana
      • Rohtak, Haryana, India, 124001
        • Recruiting
        • Sanjay Tewari

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

16 years to 60 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Age 16 years and older consenting to the surgical procedure as well as agreeing to preoperative and at least 1 follow-up CBCT evaluation after 12 months 2. Noncontributory medical history (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I and II) 3. Patients with a deep narrow pocket with probing depth >6 mm confined to buccal aspect of the root, 4. Negative response to vitality tests, 5. Radiographic evidence of radiolucency, 6. Failed previous root canal treatment and retreatment at least 1 year previously, 7. Previous surgery with unresolved bony lesion, 8. Recurrent episodes of purulent discharge, and 9. Adequate final restoration with no clinical evidence of coronal leakage.

Exclusion Criteria:

- 1. Patients with medical history with American Society of Anesthesiologists class III to V or Any systemic disease contraindicating oral surgical procedures, potentially affecting the healing process.

2. Chronic generalized periodontitis, 3. Evidence of root fracture, 4. resorptive processes involving more than apical third of the root

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Quadruple

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Periapical surgery with placement of an allograft and a membrane
Patients will undergo periapical surgery and an allograft and a membrane will be placed inside the bony crypt and over the denuded root surface respectively before closure of the flap.
Periapical surgery will be done followed by placement of an allograft into the defect and a membrane over the defect before closure of the flap.
No Intervention: Periapical surgery with no placement of any graft or membrane
Patients will undergo periapical surgery with no placement of any graft or membrane in the control group.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healing of apicomarginal defects.
Time Frame: Baseline to 12 months

Patients will be checked clinically for absence of signs and symptoms. Radiographic 2D assessment will be done by Rud and Molven criteria as follows:-

Complete healing- defined by re-establishment of the lamina dura Incomplete healing (scar tissue) Uncertain healing Unsatisfactory healing (failure). 3D healing will be assessed by modified PENN 3D criteria(Schloss et al) as-

Complete healing Limited healing Uncertain healing Unsatisfactory healing.

Baseline to 12 months

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of quality of life
Time Frame: Baseline to day 7 postoperatively
All patients will be given a questionnaire (Igor Tsesis et al) with 15 questions to evaluate their quality of life for 7 days postsurgery.
Baseline to day 7 postoperatively

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 10, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

December 29, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 10, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • Rahul Sharma

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe