Cost-Utility Analysis of Home-based Versus Hospital-based Chemotherapy in Multiple Myeloma: Case of Carfilzomib (ADHOMY2)

December 21, 2021 updated by: Pierre FEUGIER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Carfilzomib is administered in treatment of Multiple Myeloma intravenously on two consecutive days, each week for three weeks (days 1, 2, 8, 9, 15, and 16), followed by a 12-day rest period (days 17 to 28). With COVID pandemic, the investigators had to limit patient visits to the hospital. The treatment protocols were modified by switching to weekly injections of carfilzomib according to the PLEIADES and ARROW 2 studies.

Considering the frequency of intravenous (IV) administration, home-based chemotherapy in Hospital-at-Home (HaH) setting is an attractive and suitable alternative to standard hospital-based chemotherapy in Outpatient-Hospital (OH), and is expected to provide both cost-savings for the Health Insurance (HI) and improvement in patient quality of life (QoL).

The purpose of the study is to assess the cost-utility of home-based compared to hospital-based carfilzomib administration in multiple myeloma.

The investigators are also planning on assessing healthcare resource utilization and related costs, adverse and intercurrent events, and patients' quality of life and satisfaction, for each strategy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

All participants receive the first cycle of treatment in OH. They are then randomized between exclusive OH treatment and combined treatment in OH and at home with HaH services.

For the HaH group, the first injection of each cycle is delivered in OH. The rest of the cycle is delivered at home by HaH after a clinical examination (by nurse or general practitionner).

Primary and secondary endpoints are collected at day 1 of cycle 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and one month after the end of treatment.

Participants we leave the protocol prematurely in case of treatment failure, toxicity or if participant ask to. For those patients, the end of study visit will be done one month after ending treatment.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Anticipated)

52

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age > 18 years
  • relapsed multiple myeloma, at least one prior line of treatment
  • treatment with carfilzomib validated in a multidisciplinary consultation meeting and accepted by the patient
  • The patient accepts mixed management and benefits from the support of his/her family and friends (see ANAES 2003 criteria). If the patient does not have a caregiver, he/she can still participate in the research and the absence of a caregiver will be collected.
  • Patient capable of adhering to care (cf. ANAES 2003 criteria)
  • Patient affiliated to a social security system or beneficiary of such a system.
  • Patient having received full information on the organization of the research and having signed his or her informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Person with a contraindication to carfilzomib
  • Women of childbearing age who do not have effective contraception
  • Persons referred to in articles L. 1121-5, L. 1121-7; L1121-8 and L1122-1-2 of the Public Health Code
  • Pregnant woman, parturient or nursing mother
  • Minor (not emancipated)
  • Adult person under a legal protection measure (guardianship, curatorship, safeguard of justice)
  • A person of full age who is unable to express his or her consent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: Carfilzomib delivered in OH only

Patients receive the whole treatment in OH. Primary and secondary endpoints are collected at day 1 of cycle 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and one month after.

Patients leave the protocol prematurely due to treatment failure, toxicity or patient wishes. For those patients, the end of study visit will be done one month after ending treatment.

Patients receive the whole treatment en OH.
Experimental: Carfilzomib delivered in OH and HaH combined

Patients receive the first cycle of treatment in OH. Then, they are randomized between exclusive OH treatment and combined treatment in OH and at home with HaH services.

For the HaH patients group, the first injection of each cycle is delivered in OH. The rest of the cycle is delivered at home by HaH after a clinical examination (by nurse or general practitionner).

Primary and secondary endpoints are collected at day 1 of cycle 3, 6, 9, 12, 18 and one month after.

Patients leave the protocol prematurely due to treatment failure, toxicity or patient wishes. For those patients, the end of study visit will be done one month after ending treatment.

Patients receive the first cycle of treatment in OH. Then, they are randomized between exclusive OH treatment and combined treatment in OH and at home with HaH services.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) expressed in euros per QALY.
Time Frame: Up to 20 months
Incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of home-based compared to hospital-based carfilzomib administration in multiple myeloma, expressed in euros per QALY according to EQ-5D-5L questionnaire (EuroQOL 5 dimensions 5 levels) from 0 to 1 (1 being the best state with no problem)
Up to 20 months
Differences of quality of life in cancer patients between each group
Time Frame: Up to 20 months
Difference of quality of life according to EORTC QLQ-C30 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire with 30 questions, answer from 1 to 4, 1 being the best state with no problem)
Up to 20 months
Differences of quality of life in myeloma patients between each group
Time Frame: Up to 20 months
Difference of quality of life according to EORTC QLQ-MY20 questionnaire (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life Questionnaire with 20 questions related to myeloma symptoms, answer from 1 to 4, 1 being the best state with no problem)
Up to 20 months
Cost of care
Time Frame: Up to 20 month
Cost for Health Insurance by patients, at the end of treament: Total costs per patient and average cost per injection
Up to 20 month

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Healthcare resource utilization
Time Frame: Up to 20 months
  • Rate of emergency visits to the Emergency Room
  • Rate of emergency consultation with the attending physician
  • Call rate in the referring center (Nancy Hospital)
Up to 20 months
Adverse events related to myeloma treatment
Time Frame: Up to 20 months
  • Rate of nosocomial infection, neuropathy, digestive disorders
  • Unscheduled hospitalization rates
Up to 20 months
Patients and caregivers' satisfaction
Time Frame: Up to 20 months
- Patients' and Caregivers' Satisfaction Scores at the end of the treatment according to questionnaires with (opened and closes-questions) : 4 questions for OH group 9 questions for OH and HaH group 7 questions for caregiver
Up to 20 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Pierre FEUGIER, Central Hospital, Nancy, France

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Anticipated)

January 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

March 1, 2023

Study Completion (Anticipated)

October 30, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 12, 2021

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2021

First Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

January 11, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 21, 2021

Last Verified

December 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on Carfilzomib delivered in OH only

Subscribe