High Dose Busulfan and Bortezomib in Treating Patients With High Risk Multiple Myeloma Undergoing Stem Cell Transplant

March 8, 2017 updated by: Zaid Al-Kadhimi, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

A Pilot Study Using High Dose Busulfan and Bortezomib as Part of Allogeneic Transplant Conditioning Regimen for High Risk Multiple Myeloma Patients.

This pilot phase II trial studies how well giving high dose busulfan together with bortezomib works in treating patients with high risk multiple myeloma undergoing stem cell transplant. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as busulfan, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Bortezomib may stop the growth of cancer cells by blocking some of the enzymes needed for cells growth. Giving busulfan together with bortezomib before a stem cell transplant may kill more cancer cells

Study Overview

Detailed Description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. To determine time to engraftment absolute neutrophil count (> 0.5 x 10^9/L for 3 consecutive days), and platelet (> 20X 109^/L for 3 consecutive days).

2. Incidence and severity of acute graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) using fludarabine (fludarabine phosphate) / busulfan / bortezomib preparative regimen and triple immune suppression with tacrolimus, sirolimus and Thymoglobulin (anti-thymocyte globulin).

3. To determine the safety related to this combination in the first six months post transplant, specifically, treatment related mortality and grade III and IV non hematologic toxicities, based on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4 (v4).

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Incidence of myeloma progression in this high risk group of patients.

II. Incidence of transplant related mortality and morbidity.

III. Incidence of thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP) and sinusoidal obstructive syndrome (SOS).

IV. Incidence and severity of chronic GVHD.

V. Incidence of opportunistic infections including cytomegalovirus (CMV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) reactivation.

I. Overall and progression free survival (PFS) at Day 100, 6 months, 1 & 2 years post transplant.

VII. To determine recovery of T-cell, B cell, and natural killer (NK) cell phenotypes post transplant.

OUTLINE:

CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate intravenously (IV) on days -7 to -3, busulfan IV on days -6 to -3, and bortezomib IV on day -2.

GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive anti-thymocyte globulin IV on days -3 to -1, sirolimus orally (PO) on day -3, and tacrolimus IV on day -3. Patients undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) on day 0.

After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 2 years.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

1

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48201
        • Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 70 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to provide informed consent
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) >= 70
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status =< 2
  • Availability of a suitable allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell donor; minimum of human leukocyte antigen (HLA) 7/8 matched related or unrelated donor
  • High risk multiple myeloma with poor prognostic features based on having one or more of the following criteria:
  • Progressive disease after autologous transplant. No less than 3 months post auto transplant
  • Progressive or stable disease after induction chemotherapy using the most potent myeloma agents Lenalidomide and/or Bortezomib
  • Patients with high risk cytogenetic abnormalities documented on conventional cytogenetics or fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) (hypodiploidy, t(4:14), t(14:16) chromosome translocation, p53 and or complex cytogenetics) additionally, chromosome 13 deletion by standard cytogenetics
  • Negative beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (β-HCG) pregnancy test for women, as well as implementation of birth control for men and women

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with prior allogeneic transplant, or more than one prior autologous transplant for any medical reason
  • Prior treatment with busulfan or gemtuzumab (Mylotarg ®) for any reason
  • Patient with history of allergy to boron, mannitol, or bortezomib
  • Creatinine clearance (CrCl) =< 50 ml/min
  • Ejection Fraction < 50%
  • Diffusion capacity of carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 50% predicted
  • Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) < 50% predicted
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) < 50% predicted
  • Patients with uncontrolled arrhythmia or uncontrolled heart disease at the screening time; patients with coronary heart disease (recent myocardial infarctions, angina, cardiac stent, or bypass surgery in the last 6 months) need to be cleared with a stress echo or nuclear myocardial perfusion stress test, and cardiology consult; all other cardiac history will be at the discretion of the principal investigator
  • Liver enzymes > 3 times upper limit normal
  • Bilirubin > 2 mg/dl (except Gilbert's disease)
  • International normalized ratio (INR) > 2
  • Any previous history of liver failure, hepatitis, or cirrhosis
  • Systemic Amyloidosis Known history of hepatitis B, C, human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or any current uncontrolled infection
  • Grade > I neuropathy
  • Women who are pregnant or lactating
  • Current or history of alcohol or drug abuse
  • Use of other investigational agents within 30 days of enrollment to this study
  • Any patient with ascites
  • Any patient on home oxygen
  • Any clinical findings on history or physical exam which would in the opinion of the treating physician or principal investigator preclude the patient from participating in the study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Treatment (chemotherapy, enzyme inhibitor)

CONDITIONING REGIMEN: Patients receive fludarabine phosphate IV on days -7 to -3, busulfan IV on days -6 to -3, and bortezomib IV on day -2.

GVHD PROPHYLAXIS: Patients receive thymoglobulin IV on days -3 to -1, sirolimus PO on day -3, and tacrolimus IV on day -3. Patients undergo allogeneic HSCT on day 0.

Correlative studies
Given IV
Other Names:
  • 2-F-ara-AMP
  • Beneflur
  • Fludara
Correlative studies
Other Names:
  • pharmacological studies
Given IV
Other Names:
  • MLN341
  • LDP 341
  • VELCADE
Given PO
Other Names:
  • Rapamune
  • AY 22989
  • rapamycin
  • SLM
Given IV
Other Names:
  • BSF
  • BU
  • Misulfan
  • Mitosan
  • Myeloleukon
Given IV
Other Names:
  • ATGAM
  • ATG
  • Thymoglobulin
  • lymphocyte immune globulin
Undergo allogeneic HSCT
Given IV
Other Names:
  • Prograf
  • FK 506

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Incidence and Severity of Acute GVHD Using Fludarabine Phosphate / Busulfan / Bortezomib Preparative Regimen and Triple Immune Suppression With Tacrolimus, Sirolimus and Anti-thymocyte Globulin
Time Frame: First 6 months post-transplant
Graded using the Glucksberg scale. Proportions and confidence intervals will be estimated. Estimated using binary proportion estimates as well as competing risk method.
First 6 months post-transplant
Time to Platelet Absolute Neutrophil Recovery (Engraftment)
Time Frame: First 6 months post-transplant
Estimated using Kaplan-Meier method.
First 6 months post-transplant
Treatment Related Mortality Defined as Death in Continuous or Complete Remission
Time Frame: From the date of transplant to the date of death, assessed up to 6 months post transplant
Based on National Cancer Institute (NCI) CTCAE version 4.
From the date of transplant to the date of death, assessed up to 6 months post transplant
Grade III and IV Non Hematologic Toxicities
Time Frame: First 6 months post transplant
Based on NCI CTCAE version 4.
First 6 months post transplant

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Overall Survival
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post transplant
Up to 2 years post transplant
Incidence of Myeloma Progression
Time Frame: Time to the first observation of disease progression/relapse post transplant, assessed up to 2 years post transplant
Time to the first observation of disease progression/relapse post transplant, assessed up to 2 years post transplant
Incidence of Transplant Related Mortality and Morbidity
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post transplant
Up to 2 years post transplant
Incidence of TTP
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post transplant
Up to 2 years post transplant
Incidence of SOS
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post transplant
Up to 2 years post transplant
Incidence and Severity of Chronic GVHD
Time Frame: Up to 2 years post transplant
Up to 2 years post transplant
Incidence of Opportunistic Infections Including CMV, HSV, and EBV Reactivation
Time Frame: Weekly to day 100
Weekly to day 100
Progression Free Survival
Time Frame: From the day of transplant to progression, death, or last contact, assessed up to 2 years
From the day of transplant to progression, death, or last contact, assessed up to 2 years
Recovery of T-cell, B Cell and NK Cell Phenotypes
Time Frame: Days 30, 60, 90, and at 6 months after transplant
Days 30, 60, 90, and at 6 months after transplant

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Zaid Al-Kadhimi, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2012

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 13, 2012

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2012

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2012

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 5, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 8, 2017

Last Verified

March 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Stage I Multiple Myeloma

Clinical Trials on laboratory biomarker analysis

Subscribe