- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05361278
Evaluation of Gel and Solution of Chlorhexidine in Disinfection Root Canals of Primary Anterior Teeth.
Evaluation of Irrigation Effectiveness for Gel and Solution of Chlorhexidine in Disinfection Root Canals of Primary Anterior Teeth.
The process of removing bacteria and their products from the root canals is an essential step that is achieved through the combination of mechanical preparation and irrigation with chemicals. However, mechanical preparation alone can not reduce the microbial formations inside root canals, so at least about 35% of the root canal walls remain without the preparation tools reaching them.
Many irrigants were used to irrigate the root canals, as sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine are the most famous. Although most studies have proven the effectiveness of sodium hypochlorite with its different concentrations in accomplishing this task, some of them showed the inability of the irrigant fluid to eliminate Enterococcus faecalis inside the canals. These bacteria are highly resistant, and therefore endodontic treatment fails in the long term.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Detailed Description
Bacteria and their products play an essential role in the initiation and persistence of endodontic diseases. Therefore, eliminating them and preventing the return of their effectiveness is the desired goal in any successful endodontic treatment in the short and long term.
Due to the fact that mechanical preparation of the root canal alone is not capable of removing the entire bacterial content, chemical irrigants were considered necessary to reduce the number of bacteria and toxins resulting from them. Until now, there is no irrigant capable of removing the entire bacterial content from the root canal.
Despite the many advantages of sodium hypochlorite, several studies have revealed the toxicity of the solution in high concentrations of it, and it tends to cause tissue irritation when it comes into contact with the apical tissues.
Chlorhexidine has been used for a long time in dentistry due to its antibacterial properties, long period of effect, and relatively low toxicity. This has prompted its use as an irrigant and an intra-canal dressing in endodontic treatment.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Damascus, Syrian Arab Republic, 30621
- Damascus University
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Definitely positive or positive ratings of Frank scale.
- Physiological root resorption no more than the apical third
- Symptoms or signs of pulpal necrosis with or without radial lesions (swelling - fistua - abnormal movement).
- At least 2 mm of bone surrounding the permanent bud.
- Children who have not taken antibiotics in the past 3 months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systematic or mental disorders.
- Definitely negative or negative ratings of Frankel scale
- Existence external or internal abnormal absorption.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
- Allocation: RANDOMIZED
- Interventional Model: SINGLE_GROUP
- Masking: TRIPLE
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Chlorhexidine irrigation solution
CHx 2% solution will be used.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Activated chlorhexidine irrigation solution
CHx 2% solution will be used with ultrasonic activation.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Chlorhexidine irrigation gel
CHx 2% gel will be used.
|
|
|
EXPERIMENTAL: Activated chlorhexidine irrigation gel
CHx 2% gel will be used with ultrasonic activation.
|
|
|
OTHER: Sodium hypochlorite irrigation solution
NaOCl 5,25% solution will be used.
|
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of chlorhexidine solution.
Time Frame: 24 hours after sample incubation
|
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
|
24 hours after sample incubation
|
|
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of activated chlorhexidine solution.
Time Frame: 24 hours after sample incubation
|
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
|
24 hours after sample incubation
|
|
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of chlorhexidine gel.
Time Frame: 24 hours after sample incubation
|
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
|
24 hours after sample incubation
|
|
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of activated chlorhexidine gel.
Time Frame: 24 hours after sample incubation
|
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
|
24 hours after sample incubation
|
|
Logarithmic reduction of bacterial count within the root canal of sodium hypochlorite solution.
Time Frame: 24 hours after sample incubation
|
Set the Petri dish on a grid background and count the colonies in each grid cell, moving in a methodical pattern through all of the cells.
|
24 hours after sample incubation
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rahaf ِA kharsa, DDs, MSc student in Pedodontics, University of Damascus
Publications and helpful links
General Publications
- Goud S, Aravelli S, Dronamraju S, Cherukuri G, Morishetty P. Comparative Evaluation of the Antibacterial Efficacy of Aloe Vera, 3% Sodium Hypochlorite, and 2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Against Enterococcus faecalis: An In Vitro Study. Cureus. 2018 Oct 22;10(10):e3480. doi: 10.7759/cureus.3480.
- Gomes BP, Ferraz CC, Vianna ME, Berber VB, Teixeira FB, Souza-Filho FJ. In vitro antimicrobial activity of several concentrations of sodium hypochlorite and chlorhexidine gluconate in the elimination of Enterococcus faecalis. Int Endod J. 2001 Sep;34(6):424-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2591.2001.00410.x.
- Ruksakiet K, Hanak L, Farkas N, Hegyi P, Sadaeng W, Czumbel LM, Sang-Ngoen T, Garami A, Miko A, Varga G, Lohinai Z. Antimicrobial Efficacy of Chlorhexidine and Sodium Hypochlorite in Root Canal Disinfection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Endod. 2020 Aug;46(8):1032-1041.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2020.05.002. Epub 2020 May 12.
- Walia V, Goswami M, Mishra S, Walia N, Sahay D. Comparative Evaluation of the Efficacy of Chlorhexidine, Sodium Hypochlorite, the Diode Laser and Saline in Reducing the Microbial Count in Primary Teeth Root Canals - An In Vivo Study. J Lasers Med Sci. 2019 Fall;10(4):268-274. doi: 10.15171/jlms.2019.44. Epub 2019 Oct 1.
- Tirali RE, Bodur H, Ece G. In vitro antimicrobial activity of sodium hypochlorite, chlorhexidine gluconate and octenidine dihydrochloride in elimination of microorganisms within dentinal tubules of primary and permanent teeth. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2012 May 1;17(3):e517-22. doi: 10.4317/medoral.17566.
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (ACTUAL)
Primary Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Completion (ACTUAL)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (ACTUAL)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Infections
- Stomatognathic Diseases
- Bacterial Infections and Mycoses
- Tooth Demineralization
- Tooth Diseases
- Dental Caries
- Bacterial Infections
- Anti-Infective Agents, Local
- Anti-Infective Agents
- Dermatologic Agents
- Disinfectants
- Pharmaceutical Solutions
- Chlorhexidine
- Chlorhexidine gluconate
- Sodium Hypochlorite
- Eusol
Other Study ID Numbers
- UDDS-Pedo-02-2022
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.