- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05362526
High Flow vs Conventional Oxygen in Head and Neck Surgery
October 21, 2025 updated by: University of Florida
Prevention of Pulmonary Complications Using High Flow With Tracheostomy Interface vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients After Major Head and Neck Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial
Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery are at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications.
The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of high flow heated humidified oxygen at preventing postoperative pulmonary complications after major head and neck surgery, when compared to conventional oxygen therapy (aerosol cool mist).
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Participants enrolled in this study are randomly assigned to receive either conventional oxygen therapy (aerosol cool mist) or heated humidified high flow oxygen via the trach after head and neck surgery.
The study team then collects information regarding clinical outcomes to explore if there are differences between the two groups.
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
56
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Florida
-
Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
- University of Florida
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery that includes any neck dissection
- Major head and neck surgery is defined as having a mean length of stay of three or more days, based on the diagnosis [14]
- Surgery requires an elective tracheostomy for airway protection or laryngectomy tube in the case of total laryngectomy
Exclusion Criteria:
- <18 years of age
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Prevention
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: High flow with tracheostomy interface
Patient will be placed on heated humidified high flow after surgery.
|
High flow is for the treatment of spontaneously breathing patients who would benefit from receiving high flow warmed and humidified respiratory gases.
The subjects in this group will receive HFOT at a flow rate of 60-30 liters per minute, maximum concentration of 40%, which will be titrated by bedside nurse to maintain an oxygen saturation of 92% or greater (unless there is a history of COPD and then the clinician can recommend >88%)
|
|
Active Comparator: Conventional Oxygen Therapy
Pt will be placed on conventional oxygen therapy after surgery.
|
Subjects will be placed on aerosolized trach mask with cool humidification, and titrated to keep oxygen saturation >92% (unless there is a history of COPD and then the clinician can recommend >88%)
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Patients With Post-operative Pulmonary Complication
Time Frame: Day 14
|
Postoperative pulmonary complication will be defined as:
|
Day 14
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Patients Decannulated
Time Frame: 35 days
|
Number of patients who were decannulated prior to discharge.
|
35 days
|
|
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 35 days
|
Number of days from admission to hospital discharge.
|
35 days
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Rui Fernandes, MD, DMD, University of Florida
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
July 1, 2022
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 30, 2024
Study Completion (Actual)
July 1, 2024
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 2, 2022
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
May 2, 2022
First Posted (Actual)
May 5, 2022
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimated)
November 3, 2025
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
October 21, 2025
Last Verified
October 1, 2025
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- IRB202102700
- AGR00023048 (Other Identifier: UFIRST)
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
NO
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
Yes
product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.
No
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.