High Flow vs Conventional Oxygen in Head and Neck Surgery

October 21, 2025 updated by: University of Florida

Prevention of Pulmonary Complications Using High Flow With Tracheostomy Interface vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy in Patients After Major Head and Neck Surgery: Randomized Clinical Trial

Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery are at risk for postoperative pulmonary complications. The goal of this randomized clinical trial is to evaluate the effectiveness of high flow heated humidified oxygen at preventing postoperative pulmonary complications after major head and neck surgery, when compared to conventional oxygen therapy (aerosol cool mist).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Participants enrolled in this study are randomly assigned to receive either conventional oxygen therapy (aerosol cool mist) or heated humidified high flow oxygen via the trach after head and neck surgery. The study team then collects information regarding clinical outcomes to explore if there are differences between the two groups.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

56

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Jacksonville, Florida, United States, 32209
        • University of Florida

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 100 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients undergoing major head and neck surgery that includes any neck dissection
  • Major head and neck surgery is defined as having a mean length of stay of three or more days, based on the diagnosis [14]
  • Surgery requires an elective tracheostomy for airway protection or laryngectomy tube in the case of total laryngectomy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • <18 years of age

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: High flow with tracheostomy interface
Patient will be placed on heated humidified high flow after surgery.
High flow is for the treatment of spontaneously breathing patients who would benefit from receiving high flow warmed and humidified respiratory gases. The subjects in this group will receive HFOT at a flow rate of 60-30 liters per minute, maximum concentration of 40%, which will be titrated by bedside nurse to maintain an oxygen saturation of 92% or greater (unless there is a history of COPD and then the clinician can recommend >88%)
Active Comparator: Conventional Oxygen Therapy
Pt will be placed on conventional oxygen therapy after surgery.
Subjects will be placed on aerosolized trach mask with cool humidification, and titrated to keep oxygen saturation >92% (unless there is a history of COPD and then the clinician can recommend >88%)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Proportion of Patients With Post-operative Pulmonary Complication
Time Frame: Day 14

Postoperative pulmonary complication will be defined as:

  • Atelectasis or infiltrate diagnosed by radiologist on any postoperative chest radiograph within first 14 days or discharge (whichever occurs first)
  • Pneumonia Diagnosis is suggested by a history of cough, dyspnea, pleuritic pain, or acute functional or cognitive decline, with abnormal vital signs (e.g., fever, tachycardia) and lung examination findings. Diagnosis should be confirmed by chest radiography or ultrasonography." [15]
  • Chronic pulmonary obstructive disease exacerbation "An event in the natural course of the disease characterized by a change in the patient's baseline dyspnea, cough, and/or sputum and beyond normal day-to-day variations, that is acute in onset and may warrant a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD" [16]
  • Adult respiratory distress syndrome (Berlin definition)
  • Need for mechanical ventilation
  • Need for non-invasive mechanical ventilation
Day 14

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Patients Decannulated
Time Frame: 35 days
Number of patients who were decannulated prior to discharge.
35 days
Hospital Length of Stay
Time Frame: 35 days
Number of days from admission to hospital discharge.
35 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Rui Fernandes, MD, DMD, University of Florida

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 1, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 30, 2024

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2024

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 2, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 2, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimated)

November 3, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 21, 2025

Last Verified

October 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • IRB202102700
  • AGR00023048 (Other Identifier: UFIRST)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe