Novel Urine-Based DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma Detection in Patients With Hematuria

April 30, 2022 updated by: Amr Abdel-Lateif El-Sawy, Mansoura University
The current study aimed to assess the diagnostic performance of novel urine-based DNA hypermethylation of six genes (GATA4, P16, P14, APC, CDH1 and CD99) for UBC detection in patients with hematuria.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

According to GLOBOCAN data, bladder cancer (BC) is considered a major health problem that represents 3% of all cancer diagnoses. Urothelial bladder carcinoma (UBC) accounts for the vast majority (>90%) of BC cases with predominance of non-muscle invasive disease (Ta, Tis or T1) in 75% of patients while others show muscle invasion (T2-4).

In refereed population, UBC is usually diagnosed as a result of work-up for hematuria at a rate of 2-5% following an evaluation of asymptomatic microscopic hematuria, and, up to 5-15% of patients with macroscopic hematuria. Therefore, a timely prompt evaluation of hematuria can give to earlier diagnosis and better survival of UBC.

Currently, cystoscopy /cross sectional imaging are the gold standard tools for UBC diagnosis in patients with hematuria. Unfortunately, these costly, invasive and painful diagnostics could miss early, small/flat bladder lesions. Urine cytology has been proposed as a non-invasive alternative test with high specificity, however, it lacks sensitivity for diagnosis of low grade (LG) tumors.

Over the last decades, multiple researches have output different markers for UBC diagnosis. Based on their target of assessment, these markers include screening for soluble antigens (BTA-Stat, NMP-22, surviving, etc.), cell surface antigens (Cytokeratins and UroVysion), genomic markers (Cxbladder and Xpert) and urinary metabolomics (CRAT and SLC25A20). However, most of these markers are limited by unsatisfying diagnostic performance, high cost or lack of validation.

Several preliminary studies have shown that DNA methylation, a critical step in transcription regulation, is chemically stable and can be precisely quantified, making it an attractive marker for UBC detection. Both local and global DNA hypermethylation in BC specimens are usually associated with inactivation of tumor suppressor genes. These methylations changes could be effectively identified in urine sediments as well as tumor tissues.

In the current literature, multiple studies investigated the performance of DNA hypermethylation of either individual or panel genes with reported sensitivity (SN) and specificity (SP) values that range from 40-95 % and 10-100 %, respectively. Most of these studies were limited by tumor characteristics heterogeneity (majority were ≥T2 and high grade (HG) disease; which did not reflect the daily practice, inclusion of different BC histological variants), lack of external validation and small sample size.

The aim of our study is to assess the diagnostic performance of novel urine-based DNA methylation six genes (GATA4, P16, P14, APC, CDH1 and CD99) for UBC detection in patients with hematuria. Moreover, we investigated the methylation pattern of these genes in different stages and grades of UBC.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

246

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • DK
      • Mansoura, DK, Egypt, 35516
        • Mansoura Urology and Nephrology Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • patients with hematuria (macroscopic or microscopic)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • history of Bladder Cancer
  • history of pelvic irradiation,
  • bleeding diathesis or receiving anticoagulants
  • patients with upper urinary tract neoplasm or urolithiasis

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Hematuria patients
Voided urine was collected from consecutive patients presented with hematuria at our institute for urine cytology and DNA hypermethylation assay of the assigned genes using methylation-specific Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR). Further assessment by office cystoscopy and imaging with subsequent inpatient cystoscopic biopsy for positive findings, was done. The diagnostic characteristics of DNA hypermethylation and urine cytology were assessed based on its capability to predict UBC noninvasively
diagnostic cystoscopy for detection of any bladder lesions
Computed tomography for patients to exclude bladder lesions
DNA hypermethylation assay of six genes (GATA4, P16, P14, APC, CDH1 and CD99)
voided urine cytology for all patients

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Rate of hypermethylation of six genes (GATA4, P16, P14, APC, CDH1 and CD99) in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma
Time Frame: 4 weeks
Rate of hypermethylation of six genes (GATA4, P16, P14, APC, CDH1 and CD99) in patients with urothelial bladder carcinoma
4 weeks

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 27, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

May 5, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 30, 2022

Last Verified

April 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe