- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05362643
Effect of Acupuncture on Hemodialysis Patients
Effect of Acupuncture on Functional Capacity and Health-Related Quality of Life of Hemodialysis Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Study Overview
Status
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Porto, Portugal, 4050-313
- Marta Raquel Custódio Correia de Carvalho
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male and female patients, age 18 years or older, receiving regular hemodialysis (HD) treatment for more than 3 months, 3-times a week session, 4h per session, with medically stable condition.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients that refuse to participate in the study, who have a clinical indication that prevents their participation in the study and patients with other comorbidities as poorly controlled malignant hypertension, unstable angina, uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, cerebrovascular failure with recurrent syncope, uncontrolled heart failure, severe mental illness or cognitive impairment will be excluded. Other conditions such as inability to practice physical exercise, have had acupuncture treatment in the past two weeks, known hypersensitivity reaction and/or other side effects after acupuncture treatment, inability to cooperate with the procedures inherent to the application of the procedure, will be also excluded from study.
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: Double
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Acupuncture Group
Experimental groups were divided into subgroup A and B and both received a total of 9 acupuncture treatments.
However Acupuncture Subgroup A received 3 acupuncture sessions over 3 weeks and Acupuncture Subgroup B received 1 acupuncture session for 9 weeks.
The same selection of acupuncture points were applied to both subgroups.
|
Manual acupuncture on acupoint Tai Xi(KI3), bilateral;Sanyinjiao (SP6), bilateral; Zusanli (ST36), bilateral; Shenmen (HT7) unilateral, in the arm without arteriovenous fistula;Guan Yuan (CV4), unilateral, attempt to achieve De qi sensation.
After generating needling sensation, needles were manipulated for one minute, every ten minutes during needle retention (20 minutes), using Sterilized stainless steel needle (0,25x25mm; Tewa, asia-med GmbH).
|
|
Placebo Comparator: Sham Acupuncture Group
Sham Acupuncture groups were also divided into subgroup A and B and both received a total of 9 treatments. Sham Acupuncture subgroup A received 3 sessions over 3 weeks and Sham Acupuncture subgroup B received 1 session for 9 weeks. Sham Acupuncture subgroups received acupuncture on non-acupuncture points. |
Manual acupuncture performed as superficial needling (5mm depth) on non-acupuncture points without an attempt to achieve De qi sensation and without stimulation, lasting 20 minutes, using Sterilized stainless steel needle (0,25x25mm; Tewa, asia-med GmbH).
|
|
No Intervention: Non-Acupuncture Group
Non-acupuncture treatment.
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Performance on activities of daily living (ADL´s)
Time Frame: Baseline.
|
Change in functional capacity (FC) and performance on ADL´s were measured by 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The 6MWT is a practical, simple, self-paced walking test that assesses the submaximal level of functional exercise capacity. Changes in the 6 minute walk distance will be used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. |
Baseline.
|
|
Performance on activities of daily living (ADL´s)
Time Frame: After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
Change in functional capacity (FC) and performance on ADL´s were measured by 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The 6MWT is a practical, simple, self-paced walking test that assesses the submaximal level of functional exercise capacity. Changes in the 6 minute walk distance will be used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. |
After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
|
Performance on activities of daily living (ADL´s)
Time Frame: After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
Change in functional capacity (FC) and performance on ADL´s were measured by 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The 6MWT is a practical, simple, self-paced walking test that assesses the submaximal level of functional exercise capacity. Changes in the 6 minute walk distance will be used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. |
After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
|
Performance on activities of daily living (ADL´s)
Time Frame: Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Change in functional capacity (FC) and performance on ADL´s were measured by 6-Minute Walk Test (6MWT). The 6MWT is a practical, simple, self-paced walking test that assesses the submaximal level of functional exercise capacity. Changes in the 6 minute walk distance will be used to evaluate the efficacy of therapeutic interventions. |
Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Baseline.
|
Assessed by Kidney Disease Quality of Life- Short Form (KDQOL-SFTM 1. 3).
The KDQOL-SF contains eight generic subscales that assess various aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and has been widely used in CKD.
|
Baseline.
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
Assessed by Kidney Disease Quality of Life- Short Form (KDQOL-SFTM 1. 3).
The KDQOL-SF contains eight generic subscales that assess various aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and has been widely used in CKD.
|
After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
Assessed by Kidney Disease Quality of Life- Short Form (KDQOL-SFTM 1. 3).
The KDQOL-SF contains eight generic subscales that assess various aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and has been widely used in CKD.
|
After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
|
Health-Related Quality of Life
Time Frame: Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Assessed by Kidney Disease Quality of Life- Short Form (KDQOL-SFTM 1. 3).
The KDQOL-SF contains eight generic subscales that assess various aspects of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and has been widely used in CKD.
|
Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Lower limbs strength
Time Frame: Baseline.
|
Measured by 30 second Sit-to-Stand (STS-30) Test.
|
Baseline.
|
|
Lower limbs strength
Time Frame: After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
Measured by 30 second Sit-to-Stand (STS-30) Test.
|
After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
|
Lower limbs strength
Time Frame: After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
Measured by 30 second Sit-to-Stand (STS-30) Test.
|
After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
|
Lower limbs strength
Time Frame: Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Measured by 30 second Sit-to-Stand Test.
|
Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
|
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Measured by Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Test, using a digital dynamometer.
HGS test is commonly used as an indicator of overall muscle strength.
|
Baseline
|
|
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
Measured by Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Test, using a digital dynamometer.
HGS test is commonly used as an indicator of overall muscle strength.
|
After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
|
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
Measured by Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Test, using a digital dynamometer.
HGS test is commonly used as an indicator of overall muscle strength.
|
After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
|
Handgrip strength
Time Frame: Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Measured by Hand Grip Strength (HGS) Test, using a digital dynamometer.
HGS test is commonly used as an indicator of overall muscle strength.
|
Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Other Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Demographic and clinical variables
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Collected by Sociodemographic and Clinical Data Collection Form.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pre-intervention questionnaire
Time Frame: Baseline
|
Participants who received acupuncture or sham acupuncture (acupuncture or sham acupuncture) answered a questionnaire about their expectations regarding the treatment.
|
Baseline
|
|
Pos-intervention questionnaire
Time Frame: After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
Participants who received acupuncture (acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups) answered a questionnaire to assess the degree of discomfort felt in the acupuncture treatment, the concealment of the treatment, the perception of the results and the interference of the acupuncture treatment in the routine of hemodialysis.
|
After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
|
Pos-intervention questionnaire
Time Frame: After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
Participants who received acupuncture (acupuncture and sham acupuncture groups) answered a questionnaire to assess the degree of discomfort felt in the acupuncture treatment, the concealment of the treatment, the perception of the results and the interference of the acupuncture treatment in the routine of hemodialysis.
|
After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
|
Blood analytical data
Time Frame: Baseline.
|
Blood Tests
|
Baseline.
|
|
Blood analytical data
Time Frame: After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
Blood Tests
|
After Treatment: 3 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup A).
|
|
Blood analytical data
Time Frame: After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
Blood Tests
|
After Treatment: 9 weeks after baseline assessment (subgroup B).
|
|
Blood analytical data
Time Frame: Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Blood Tests
|
Follow up (12 weeks post-treatment).
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Marta RC Correia de Carvalho, M.Sc, ICBAS School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences - Oporto University, Portugal
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Keywords
Other Study ID Numbers
- UPorto_MCC
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.