- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05363306
Apico-coronal Position of Tissue-level Implants Bone Stability
Influence of the Apico-coronal Position of Tissue-level Implants on Marginal Bone Stability
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
Early marginal bone loss (EMBL) is a non-infective remodeling process of peri-implant crestal bone occurring within the first year after implant insertion. EMBL has a multifactorial etiology, being influenced by various surgical and prosthetic factors, including insufficient crestal width, surgical trauma, biological width formation, microbial colonization of implant-abutment micro-gap, horizontal implant-abutment mismatch ("the platform-switching concept"), the number of abutment connection/disconnections, prosthetic abutment height, design and mechanical stability of implant-abutment connection and adaptive response to occlusal loading.
Biological width formation is the main factor influencing peri-implant marginal bone adaptive processes prior to prosthesis delivery. When an implant gets exposed to the oral cavity, soft tissues establish a cuff-like barrier sealing the trans-epithelial component of the fixture.
Differently from equicrestal and subcrestal implants, which present a microgap between implant and abutment at the marginal bone level, tissue-level implants have no gap at this region.
The present multicenter prospective study aims to evaluate if EMBL occurring around tissue-level dental implants before prosthesis delivery may be reduced by adapting apico-coronal positioning in relation to supracrestal tissue thickness.
All patients are treated according to one-stage implant. Sutures are removed 12-14 days after surgery. No removable prostheses are utilized during the healing period.
Final impressions were taken five months after the implant placement. After functional and aesthetic try-in, a single-unit screw-retained metal ceramic crown is delivered. The fixation screw was torqued to 30Ncm following manufacturer's guidelines. Screw access is then closed using light-cured composite resin.
Radiographic measurements. Digital radiographs, customized for each patient with a bite jig, are taken using a long-cone paralleling technique with a film holder at the time of implant placement (baseline, T0), 3 months after implant placement (T1), and 5 months after implant placement, immediately before impression taking (T2). All radiographs are performed using the same x-ray generator technology, set with the same parameters (60 kV, 7 mA).
Two different types of bone changes are calculated, as suggested elsewhere.
- Early marginal bone loss (EMBL) is calculated.
- Bone Loss Exposing Implant Surface (BLEIS) is calculated as the difference between the EMBL measurement and the 3 mm length of the transmucosal, machined portion of the implant.
Radiographs demonstrating any deformation, darkness and/or other problem are immediately repeated. All measurements are made by a single calibrated examiner, blind to mucosal thickness, using a 30-inch led-backlit color diagnostic display with Kodak Digital Imaging Software. Each measurement is repeated three times at three different time points as proposed by Gomez-Roman and Launer. Intra-examiner and inter-examiner concordances are 96.1% and 90.4%, respectively, for linear measurements within ±0.1mm.
Study Type
Enrollment (Actual)
Contacts and Locations
Study Locations
-
-
-
Parma, Italy, 43100
- Piezosurgery Academy
-
-
CS
-
Cassano allo Ionio, CS, Italy, 87011
- Hesire
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Genders Eligible for Study
Sampling Method
Study Population
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients were partially edentulous and required placement of at least one single delayed implant in pristine bone in the posterior mandible
- presence of keratinized mucosa with a minimum bucco-lingual width of 3 mm;
- bone crest with at least 6mm of width and 9 mm of height above the mandibular canal without concomitant or previous bone augmentation procedures;
- presence of the opposing dentition
Exclusion Criteria:
- smokers
- uncontrolled periodontitis
- medication consumption for at least 3 months prior to treatment
- history of head or neck radiation therapy
- pregnancy or lactating at any time during the study
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Observational Models: Cohort
- Time Perspectives: Prospective
Cohorts and Interventions
Group / Cohort |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
thin crestal mucosa
Based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement, implants were placed: 2mm below the crestal bone in presence of thin mucosa (< 2.5mm)
|
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement. Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component. |
|
medium crestal mucosa
Based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement, implants were placed: 2) 1mm below the crestal bone in presence of medium mucosa (2.5-3.5mm);
|
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement. Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component. |
|
thick crestal mucosa
Based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement, implants were placed: 1) at crestal level in presence of thick mucosa (> 3.5 mm);
|
4% articaine solution, a mid-crestal incision along the center of the edentulous bone ridge was performed. A full-thickness flap was elevated. The sites were prepared to permit insertion of transmucosal, external hex, implants (I-smart, I-RES, Lugano, Switzerland) at three different crestal levels, based upon vertical mucosa thickness measured at implant placement. Owing to width crest, all implants were 3.75 mm in diameter and operators selected appropriate implant lengths (8, 10 mm) according to available bone crest height. All implants were not submerged and flaps were sutured around the transmucosal component. |
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
early marginal bone loss
Time Frame: 5 months after implant placement
|
distance from crystal bone to most coronal bone to implant contact
|
5 months after implant placement
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
biological complications
Time Frame: during surgery
|
any surgical complication
|
during surgery
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Teresa Lombardi, Dr., Hesire dental office
Publications and helpful links
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Actual)
Study Completion (Actual)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
Other Study ID Numbers
- TLMBS
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.