- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT05365919
Family Talk Intervention in the Context of Specialised Palliative Home Care
The Family Talk Intervention in Clinical Practice When a Parent With Dependent Children is Severely Ill: An Effectiveness-implementation Study
This intervention study aims to evaluate a psychosocial family based intervention in clinical practice, the Family Talk Intervention (FTI), for families with dependent children affected by life-threatening/life-limiting illness, when a parent is ill.
The study has an effectiveness implementation hybrid design where both the effects of FTI and the implementation process in clinical practice are examined.
Study Overview
Status
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Detailed Description
When a family with dependent children is affected by severe illness this affects the entire family. Still, there is little research evaluating support to such families. This intervention study aims to evaluate a psychosocial family based intervention in clinical practice, the Family Talk Intervention (FTI), for families with dependent children affected by life-threatening/life-limiting illness, when a parent is ill.
The study has an effectiveness implementation hybrid design where both the effects of FTI and the implementation process in clinical practice are examined. FTI will be carried out as a cluster randomized trial at 12 clinics in specialized palliative homecare (6 units=intervention, 6 units=control).
All social workers at these clinics will receive education and training in FTI in 2021. From 2022, FTI will be offered to families cared for at these care contexts.
FTI is manual-based and consists of 6 meetings with the families (together and individually) and is led by the FTI-educated social workers. The aim of FTI are to support the family in talking about illness-related subjects (e.g. prognosis, stress), support parenting, and support the family in identifying their strengths and how to best use them.
FTI will be evaluated through surveys and interviews with families before FTI/baseline and after completed intervention (3 and 6 months after baseline). Further, social workers will be invited to compete questionnaires and take part in focus groups about their experiences of FTI.
The research group has conducted pilot-studies on FTI in these contexts with positive results. The present study allows us to take a further step in the evaluation of FTI- evaluate FTI under real conditions.
Study Type
Enrollment (Estimated)
Phase
- Not Applicable
Contacts and Locations
Study Contact
- Name: Malin Lövgren, PhD
- Phone Number: +46766365090
- Email: malin.lovgren@mchs.se
Study Contact Backup
- Name: Anette Alvariza, PhD
- Phone Number: +46766365073
- Email: anette.alvariza@mchs.se
Study Locations
-
-
-
Stockholm, Sweden
- Recruiting
- Marie Cederschiöld Unicersity College
-
Contact:
- Malin Lövgren, PhD
- Email: malin.lovgren@mcsh.se
-
-
Participation Criteria
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Families affected by a life-threatening or life-limiting illness and have dependent children, ill or health aged 0-19 years and
- Enrolled in specialized palliative home care
- At least two family members have accepted to participate
Exclusion Criteria:
-
Study Plan
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Intervention
The intervention group will be offered to participate in the Family Talk Intervention
|
FTI entails six meetings, with intervals of 1-2 weeks between meetings.
Meetings 1-2 include only the parent(s) and focus on their experiences of the situation, as well as the consequences of the diagnosis for each family member.
The parent(s) will formulate the goal of the intervention.
Meeting 3: Interviews will be held with each child and includes the child's life situation.
Meeting 4 includes the parent(s) and focuses on planning the family meeting.
The children's thoughts and questions serve as a guide for the upcoming family meeting.
Meeting 5 is a family meeting and consists of questions and issues raised earlier by the family members.
Meeting 6 is a follow-up with all family members.
The meeting is guided by the family members' needs, e.g., regarding communication and parenting.
If the intervention is interrupted unexpectedly and cannot be finished as scheduled due to extraordinary circumstances, extra meetings are available (Meetings 7-11).
Other Names:
|
|
No Intervention: Standard support
The control group will receive standard support
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in family Communication over time. Family Adaptability and Cohesion Scale IV
Time Frame: Six months
|
Measures in self-rated family communication which is the primary outcome of the intervention
|
Six months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Changes in self-rated resilience. Resilience Scale (RS-14) ((Resilience Scale for Children (RS-10)).
Time Frame: Six months
|
Measures self-rated resilience in adults and children
|
Six months
|
|
Changes in self-rated grief. Prolonged Grief Disorder (PG-12/PG-13).
Time Frame: Six months
|
An instrument to screen for pathologic forms of grief before and after an expected death
|
Six months
|
|
Changes in self-rated anxiety. Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD)
Time Frame: Six months
|
Measures symptoms of anxiety
|
Six months
|
|
Changes in The Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ)
Time Frame: Six months
|
Measures self-rated strengths and difficulties.
Has a proxy version for children
|
Six months
|
|
Changes in self-perceived parenting skill. Parental Skills Checklist (PSC)
Time Frame: Six months
|
Measures self-rated parenting abilities
|
Six months
|
|
Changes in factors needed for successful implementation.The Swedish Normalization Process Theory Measure (S-NoMAD)
Time Frame: Six months
|
For the implementation research.
Characterizes and explains key mechanisms that promote and inhibit the implementation, embedding and integration of new health techniques, technologies and other complex interventions.
|
Six months
|
|
Changes in perception of organizational context. Alberta Context Tool (ACT)
Time Frame: Six months
|
For the implementation research.
Measures organizational context for use in complex healthcare settings.
|
Six months
|
Collaborators and Investigators
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Malin Lövgren, PhD, Marie Cederschiölds University College
Study record dates
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
Primary Completion (Estimated)
Study Completion (Estimated)
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
First Posted (Actual)
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
Last Verified
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- Marie Cederschiöld University
Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)
Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?
Drug and device information, study documents
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.