CompArison of PCI in NaTive Arteries Versus ByPAss Grafts In PatieNts With Prior CABG (CAPTAIN)

May 10, 2022 updated by: Yujie Zhou, Beijing Anzhen Hospital

Comparison of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Native Arteries Versus Bypass Grafts in Patients With Prior Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting

Coronary atherosclerotic heart disease (CAD) has been considered the leading cause of death in both developed and developing countries. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) is a major therapy of CAD in the world, mainly used for patients with left main disease, multi-vessel complex disease, stent implantation failure, heart failure and diabetes.

Studies have demonstrated that significant angiographic defects up to 12% of grafts, which was observed by immediate coronary angiography after CABG. Despite secondary prevention were performed in patients after CABG, the early failure rate at 1 year is higher, up to 15-20%, the 10-year patency rate of internal mammary artery graft is 85%, and the 10-year patency rate of saphenous vein graft is only 61%, and 10-20% of patients require revascularization within 10 years after CABG.

Patients with failed grafts usually have a higher surgical risk and the morality of repeat CABG is 2-4 times higher than primary surgery. Because of the poor clinical prognosis of patients undergoing repeat CABG, PCI is the preferred treatment strategy for revascularization in patients with previous CABG. In patients with previous CABG, approximately 75% of PCI target vessels are native vessels.

Compared with native vessel PCI, bypass graft PCI has a higher rate of short- and long-term major adverse events, including more than double the in-hospital mortality rate. Some studies support the above view,but others denied. Therefore, the primary study mainly to explore the effect of native vessel PCI or graft PCI on the prognosis of patients with previous CABG.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

1491

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Beijing
      • Beijing, Beijing, China, 100000
        • Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • ADULT
  • OLDER_ADULT
  • CHILD

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Coronary artery disease patients received first percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries or in bypass grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients received first percutaneous coronary intervention in native arteries or in bypass grafts after coronary artery bypass grafting

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who missed follow-up data were excluded

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Native vessel PCI
Native vessel PCI, which choose native coronary artery as the target vessel
Native vessel PCI,which choose native coronary artery as the target vessel, while the bypass graft PCI choose graft vessel as the target vessel.
Bypass graft PCI
Bypass graft PCI, which choose the graft vessel as the target vessel
Native vessel PCI,which choose native coronary artery as the target vessel, while the bypass graft PCI choose graft vessel as the target vessel.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE)
Time Frame: about 10 years after PCI
A composite of all-cause death, non-fatal stroke, non-fatal myocardial infarction
about 10 years after PCI

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (ACTUAL)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

April 1, 2022

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

May 1, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

May 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 6, 2022

First Posted (ACTUAL)

May 10, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

May 16, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2022

Last Verified

May 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Coronary Artery Disease

Clinical Trials on PCI in native vessel or in bypass graft

Subscribe