Algorithms to Diagnose Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

June 9, 2022 updated by: RenJi Hospital

Development and Validation of a Radiomics-based Diagnosis Model for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension

The investigators intend to evalute the value of radiomics signature of pulmonary vessels from chest computed tomography (CT) for dianosis and prognosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension.

Study Overview

Status

Recruiting

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a heterogeneous disorder composed of varying pathobiology that may involve multiple clinical conditions. Computed tomography (CT) is a minimally invasive imaging technique capable of providing both high contrast and high resolution detail of the lungs and arteries. Application of radiomics as prognosis and diagnosis tools could quantifies high-dimensional features from CT data to investigate vescualr heterogeneity.Development and validation of PAH diagnosis Algorithms based on radiomics may serve as a complementary readout to current CT-based metrics and provide valuable evidence to make the treatment management decision in early PAH.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

250

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

      • Shanghai, China, 200127
        • Recruiting
        • Renji hospital
        • Contact:
          • Binaqian Ruan, postgraduate
          • Phone Number: +8613616692589
          • Email: 907945323@qq.com

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 75 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

The development cohort is case_control research, composed of patients diagnosed with PAH and healthy control group from 2018.10 to now in RenjiH and Jiangsu Province Hospital.

The validation cohort is prospective study to test the accuracy of diagonisis model, composed of patients are suspected as PAH or healthy volunteer by echocardiography form other medical institutions.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Chest CT examination and cardiac ultrasound examination were performed within 3 months before and after right heart catheterization;
  2. mPAP > 25mmHg and PVR< 3woods (measured by right heart catheter) and pulmonary vascular resistance was collected as PAH group whereas Healthy Volunteers as non-PAH control group in developement corhort;
  3. sPAP > 36mmHg (measured by echocardiography) was collected in validation corhort.

Exclusion Criteria:

1.Cancer; 2. The quality of chest CT and cardiac ultrasound images is poor; 3.Pulmonary vascular segmentation is affected by thoracic organ displacement or pulmonary vascular complete occlusion due to diseases ,such as spinal deformity.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
The development cohort
The development cohort was composed of patients diagnosed with PAH and healthy control group from 2019.1-2021.5 in RenjiH.
The validation cohort
The validation cohort was composed of patients are suspected as PAH by echocardiography in 2021.5-2021.12 or suspected patients are form other medical institutions.
The development cohort is case_control research. The validation cohort is prospective study to test the accuracy of calculated radscore based on diagonisis model.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
DIAGONOSIS
Time Frame: 1 year
The patient is diagnosed PAH or not by right heart catheter
1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

January 17, 2019

Primary Completion (Anticipated)

December 1, 2022

Study Completion (Anticipated)

June 1, 2023

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

June 6, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 14, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 9, 2022

Last Verified

March 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe