Prospective Single-center Long-term Follow-up Study of a Series of Cases Previously Included in the QUALVIDON Study (QUALVIDON2)

Description of Symptoms, Impact on Quality of Life, Ophthalmological Examination and Treatment of Patients With Neuropathic Eye Pain Associated With Dry Eye: a Prospective Single-center Long-term Follow-up Study of a Series of Cases Previously Included in the QUALVIDON Study

Dry eye affects millions of people around the world. Some dry eye patients complain of neuropathic eye pain that can affect their quality of life.

From August 2016 to June 2017, the QUALVIDON study (NCT03296111), conducted at the Adolphe de Rothschild Foundation Hospital, assessed pain and its impact on quality of life using self-administered questionnaires in a series of dry eye patients. This 2nd study, entitled QUALVIDON2, focuses on the outcome of patients previously included in QUALVIDON.

Study Overview

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

14

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Paris, France, 75019
        • Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients previously included in the QUALVIDON study, with characteristics of idiopathic neuropathic eye pain associated with dry eye

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients previously included in the QUALVIDON study with the following characteristics:
  • With characteristics of idiopathic neuropathic eye pain associated with dry eye
  • Give informed consent
  • Affiliated or beneficiary of the french social security

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing woman
  • Patient under legal protection

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Case-Only
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
Patients with characteristics of idiopathic neuropathic eye pain associated with dry eye
Previously included in the QUALVIDON study
  • Neuropathic Eye Pain Questionnaire
  • 5-item Dry Eye Evaluation Questionnaire (DEQ-5)
  • Visual Impact Assessment Questionnaire
  • Concise Ophthalmic Pain Questionnaire
  • Questionnaire to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerance of treatments
  • Chronic pain questionnaire
  • Examination of the ocular surface and eyelids Slit lamp with fluorescein instillation: Oxford scheme and Break-up time, Schirmer's test, Oxybuprocaine test
  • Lipiview® test
  • Examination of corneal sensitivity with the Cochet-Bonnet esthesiometer
  • In vivo morphological examination of the subepithelial nerve plexus of the cornea by confocal microscopy

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of neuropathic eye pain
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Total score of the french neuropathic eye pain questionnaire (QDON) Range from 0 to 28. A score with higher value reflects a more severe disease.
at 5 years follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Assessment of Oxford score
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Oxford score (range from 0 to V). Interpretation: 0= mild symptoms to V= severe symptoms.
at 5 years follow-up
Assessment of Schirmer's test
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Schirmer's test (in millimeters)
at 5 years follow-up
Assessment of Tear break up time
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Tear break up time (in seconds)
at 5 years follow-up
Diagnosis of blepharitis
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Diagnosis of blepharitis (none or yes: minimal/moderate/severe)
at 5 years follow-up
Assessment of Meibomian gland dysfunction
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Meibomian gland dysfunction (none or yes: minimal/ moderate/severe)
at 5 years follow-up
Assessment of the thickness of tear film lipid Layer
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Characterization of the thickness of the tear film lipid Layer (evaluated by Lipiview® and quantified by the device in nm)
at 5 years follow-up
Diagnosis of atrophy of the Meibomian glands
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Diagnosis of atrophy of the Meibomian glands (evaluated by Lipiview® and rated by the device, from 0 to 4)
at 5 years follow-up
Assessment of corneal sensitivity
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Corneal sensitivity will be assessed by the Cochet-Bonnet aesthesiometer (in millimeters)
at 5 years follow-up
Assessment of dry eye severity
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Total score of the french version of the DEQ-5 (Dry Eye Questionnaire). Range from 0 to 22. A score with higher value reflects a more severe dryness.
at 5 years follow-up
Visual impact of dry eye
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Total score of the french version of the OSDI (Ocular Surface Disease Index). Range from 0 to 48. A score with higher value reflects a more severe visual impact.
at 5 years follow-up
General impact of eye pain
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up

Total score of the french version of the modified BPI (Brief Pain Inventory) for ophtalmology.

Range from 0 to 110. A score with higher value reflects a more severe general impact of the pain.

at 5 years follow-up
Psychologic impact of eye pain
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up

Total sub-scores of Anxiety (A) and depression (D) of the french version of the HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale).

Scores A (Anxiety): range from 0 to 21. Interpretation: < or = 7: no symptom of anxiety, 8 to 10: uncertain symptomatology, > or = 7: symptoms of anxiety Scores D (Depression): range from 0 to 21. Interpretation: < or = 7: no symptom of depression, 8 to 10: uncertain symptomatology, > or = 7: symptoms of depression

at 5 years follow-up
Drug effectivness (pain relief)
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Pain relief will be assess with a likert type scale (range from 0 = "none" to 5 = "total relief") for each drug
at 5 years follow-up
Drug safety
Time Frame: at 5 years follow-up
Drug safety will be assess with a likert type scale (range from 0 = "none" to 5 = "total safety") for each drug
at 5 years follow-up

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Serge DOAN, MD, Hôpital Fondation A. de Rothschild

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

September 15, 2022

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2022

Study Completion (Actual)

December 6, 2022

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 8, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

August 31, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

December 8, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 6, 2022

Last Verified

December 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe