Comparison of Mucin Levels at the Ocular Surface of Visual Display Users With and Without Dry Eye Disease

November 20, 2022 updated by: Peking University Third Hospital
The study aimed to evaluate 1) if levels of the glycocalyx membrane mucins, including MUC1, MUC4, MUC16 and MUC20, are altered in conjunctival cells of visual display users With and Without Dry Eye Disease, and 2) if mucin levels correlate with dry eye clinical diagnostic data.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate 1) if levels of the glycocalyx membrane mucins, including MUC1, MUC4, MUC16 and MUC20, are altered in conjunctival cells of visual display users With and Without Dry Eye Disease, and 2) if mucin levels correlate with dry eye clinical diagnostic data.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

94

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Beijing, China, 100191
        • Peking University Third Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Video display terminals users with and without dry eye disease.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants who exposed to video display terminals for more than 1 year (at least 5 days per week and 6 hours per day) were enrolled and divided into two groups: (1) VDT users with DED and (2) VDT users without DED. DED was diagnosed according to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) DEWS II criteria: (1) Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥ 13 and (2) one of these signs; fluorescein tear breakup time (TBUT) <10 sec; abnormal ocular surface staining (>5 corneal spots or > 9 conjunctival spots).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • a history of contact lens wear or ocular surgery within 2 year of the study visit; a history of previous ocular disease; topical or systemic therapies other than artificial tears within two weeks before recruitment; and inflammatory ocular diseases, ocular surface diseases, glaucoma and systemic diseases with ocular involvement, such as meibomian gland dysfunction, diabetes, and peripheral neuropathy.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Observational Models: Other
  • Time Perspectives: Cross-Sectional

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Intervention / Treatment
dry eye disease
Dry eye disease was diagnosed according to the Tear Film and Ocular Surface Society (TFOS) DEWS II criteria: (1) Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI) score ≥ 13 and (2) one of these signs; fluorescein tear breakup time (TBUT) <10 sec; abnormal ocular surface staining (>5 corneal spots or > 9 conjunctival spots).
no intervention
control
The controll group enrolled healthy participants without ocular and systemic diseases.
no intervention

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
mucin expression
Time Frame: immediately after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria
The mRNA expression of mucin was measured by Quantitative real-time PCR, which is a laboratory technique of molecular biology to find out how much of a specific section of DNA there is in a sample.
immediately after meeting the inclusion and exclusion criteria

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Hong Qi, PhD, Peking University Third Hospital

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 1, 2021

Primary Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

September 2, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

October 29, 2022

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

October 29, 2022

First Posted (Actual)

November 3, 2022

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 23, 2022

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 20, 2022

Last Verified

October 1, 2022

More Information

Terms related to this study

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe