The Efficacy of A-PRF+ on Postoperative Outcomes Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars (A-PRF+: Advanced Platelet Rich Fibrin) (A-PRF+)

April 10, 2023 updated by: Nguyen Thi Bich Ly, University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

The Efficacy of A-PRF+ on Postoperative Outcomes Following Surgical Removal of Impacted Mandibular Third Molars: a Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives: This study aims to evaluate the effects of A-PRF+ on postoperative pain, swelling, and trismus after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

Method and Materials: A randomized controlled trial with a parallel design was performed on healthy patients with 76 impacted mandibular third molars with similar difficulty level, having needs and indications for extraction. All patients had the same standardized extraction protocol at the Department of Minor Oral Surgery of the National Hospital of Odonto - Stomatology in HCM City. In the study group, patients' blood was collected and centrifugated to produce A-PRF+, then placed in the wisdom tooth sockets after surgery. In the control group, the tooth sockets were curetted and sutured as in standard protocol. Pain value was assessed according to the VAS at 2, 4, and 6-hour time points after patients' lower lips stopped feeling numb, and on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative day; Swelling was evaluated based on the measurement between facial landmarks; Trismus was assessed based on the distance between incisal edges of upper central incisor and lower incisor during maximum mouth opening on the 3rd and 7th postoperative days. Data obtained were statistically analyzed.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

The study was a parallel randomized controlled trial on patients having impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) extraction. This study was performed at the Department of Minor Oral Surgery in the National Hospital of Odonto - Stomatology in HCM City from October 2019 to April 2021. All patients who had IMTM extraction were examined by the dentists at the Department of Minor Oral Surgery. If IMTM were Montero≥2(7), patients would be referred to the research team. After reviewing the criteria for inclusion and exclusion, the investigators explained to all patients the information about the operation, healing time, and possible complications, and the investigators obtained their informed consent before surgery.

Based on recent research with a power of 80% and α=5%, the investigators calculated the minimum sample size for comparing 2 mean values. The result is each group needs a minimum of 36 participants. The initial sample consisted of 85 in both groups intended to participate in this study at the Department of Minor Oral Surgery in the National Hospital of Odonto - Stomatology in HCM City from October 2019 to April 2021. One patient was excluded from this study because of the ASA PS Index>2. After randomization, one patient in the study group could not collect blood for centrifugation; seven patients were excluded due to lack of compliance (four in the control group, three in the study group). Finally, 76 samples remained in this study (Male 23, Female 53).

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

76

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ho Chi Minh
      • Ho Chi Minh City, Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 70000
        • National Hospital of Odonto-Stomatology, Ho Chi Minh City

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Older than 18 of age
  • Healthy patients (ASA PS index ≤ 2)
  • The impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) had to be in the "deep molars" ≥ 2 (according to Montero classification)
  • Absence of acute inflammation and/or infection in the IMTM areas
  • No history of NSAID usage four weeks before surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Those with systemic conditions or pharmacologic treatments that alter oral microbiota or immunologic response
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Those with the presence of any neoplastic lesion (benign or malignant), clinically or radiologically, at the extraction site or close to the IMTM
  • Those with the presence of any radiolucent lesion larger than 1cm at the IMTM
  • Those absent of the adjacent teeth
  • Lack of compliance

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Supportive Care
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: Control Group
Participants had their impacted mandibular third molar (IMTM) extracted according to the standard procedure.
Experimental: Experimental Group
20ml of venous blood was collected from each participant in this group into two glass tubes (10ml, A-PRF by Choukroun) and centrifuge to create A-PRF+ using Dou Quattro Choukroun PRF machine with a speed of 1300 rpm in 8 minutes, centrifugal force at the bottom of the tube was RCFmax 208g (RCFmin=113g, RCFav=164g, RCFclot=145g). After the standard extraction procedure, place two A-PRF+ clots in the IMTM socket before suturing.
A-PRF+ contributes to accelerating the healing process, more rapid revascularization, and reducing the risk of inflammation at the graft site. It leads to a decrease in the severity of postoperative complications. Many authors have mentioned platelet concentrates as an effective adjunction that improves the healing of hard and soft tissue and decreases pain, swelling, and trismus. However, there are still some controversial results in the literature. Recently, it has been demonstrated that the production of PRF with lower centrifugal force and lower centrifugal time has more potential to release several growth factors and facilitate more favorable healing at the site of the application when compared to standard PRF. Promoting the healing process after tooth extraction using A-PRF+ aims to manage patient discomfort as well as postoperation complications.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
VAS index indicating pain value 2 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
Time Frame: 2 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
The pain was evaluated subjectively by suggesting patients mark the severity of pain on the VAS, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) in increasing order of pain severity. The patients would record their pain score by marking a point on a straight line; the pain point would be the measured distance from the left end to the point that the patient marked.
2 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
VAS index indicating pain value 4 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
Time Frame: 4 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
The pain was evaluated subjectively by suggesting patients mark the severity of pain on the VAS, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) in increasing order of pain severity. The patients would record their pain score by marking a point on a straight line; the pain point would be the measured distance from the left end to the point that the patient marked.
4 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
VAS index indicating pain value 6 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
Time Frame: 6 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
The pain was evaluated subjectively by suggesting patients mark the severity of pain on the VAS, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) in increasing order of pain severity. The patients would record their pain score by marking a point on a straight line; the pain point would be the measured distance from the left end to the point that the patient marked.
6 hours immediately after the lips stopped feeling numb
VAS index indicating pain value 1 day after surgery
Time Frame: 1 day after surgery
The pain was evaluated subjectively by suggesting patients mark the severity of pain on the VAS, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) in increasing order of pain severity. The patients would record their pain score by marking a point on a straight line; the pain point would be the measured distance from the left end to the point that the patient marked.
1 day after surgery
VAS index indicating pain value 3 days after surgery
Time Frame: 3 days after surgery
The pain was evaluated subjectively by suggesting patients mark the severity of pain on the VAS, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) in increasing order of pain severity. The patients would record their pain score by marking a point on a straight line; the pain point would be the measured distance from the left end to the point that the patient marked.
3 days after surgery
VAS index indicating pain value 7 days after surgery
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
The pain was evaluated subjectively by suggesting patients mark the severity of pain on the VAS, which ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (unbearable pain) in increasing order of pain severity. The patients would record their pain score by marking a point on a straight line; the pain point would be the measured distance from the left end to the point that the patient marked.
7 days after surgery
Maximum mouth opening at baseline
Time Frame: Before surgery
The maximum mouth opening (the distance between incisal edges of upper and lower central incisors) difference before and after surgery indicates trismus.
Before surgery
Change in maximum mouth opening between baseline and 3 days after surgery
Time Frame: 3 days after surgery
The maximum mouth opening (the distance between incisal edges of upper and lower central incisors) difference before and after surgery indicates trismus
3 days after surgery
Change in maximum mouth opening between baseline and 7 days after surgery
Time Frame: 7 days after surgery
The maximum mouth opening (the distance between incisal edges of upper and lower central incisors) difference before and after surgery indicates trismus
7 days after surgery
Mean Facial Landmark Length at baseline
Time Frame: Before surgery
Preoperatively, patients are marked with landmarks on the face A, B, C, D with an indelible brush to measure facial swelling. A is the canthus of the eye, B is the gonion, C is the tragus, D is the mouth commissure. Patients were seated in a relaxing position with the inferior border of the mandible parallel to the floor. Use a non-elastic ruler that measures preoperative measurements, including AB as vertical swelling score and CD as horizontal swelling score. The patient was re-measured the length size of the two AB and CD that had been marked and measured.
Before surgery
Mean Facial Landmark Length 3 days after operation
Time Frame: 3 days after operation
Preoperatively, patients are marked with landmarks on the face A, B, C, D with an indelible brush to measure facial swelling. A is the canthus of the eye, B is the gonion, C is the tragus, D is the mouth commissure. Patients were seated in a relaxing position with the inferior border of the mandible parallel to the floor. Use a non-elastic ruler that measures preoperative measurements, including AB as vertical swelling score and CD as horizontal swelling score. The patient was re-measured the length size of the two AB and CD that had been marked and measured.
3 days after operation
Mean Facial Landmark Length 7 days after operation
Time Frame: 7 days after operation
Preoperatively, patients are marked with landmarks on the face A, B, C, D with an indelible brush to measure facial swelling. A is the canthus of the eye, B is the gonion, C is the tragus, D is the mouth commissure. Patients were seated in a relaxing position with the inferior border of the mandible parallel to the floor. Use a non-elastic ruler that measures preoperative measurements, including AB as vertical swelling score and CD as horizontal swelling score. The patient was re-measured the length size of the two AB and CD that had been marked and measured.
7 days after operation

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

October 1, 2019

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 23, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

April 30, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 25, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 24, 2023

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 10, 2023

Last Verified

April 1, 2023

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 194/ĐHYD-HĐĐĐ

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

NO

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe