Study on Prognosis of Acutely Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms (SPARTA)

March 22, 2025 updated by: Wouter Moojen, Haaglanden Medical Centre

The SPARTA study is a prospective multicenter observational trial in the Netherlands with the aim of identifying the best clinical care in patients with aneurysmal subarachnoidal haemorrhage. Differences in outcome between surgical treatment and endovascular treatment will be explored.

Furthermore, cost effectiveness and radiological prognostic factors will be examined.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Rationale:

Ruptured intracranial aneurysms resulting in subarachnoid haemorrhage can be treated by open surgical treatment or endovascular treatment. Despite multiple previous studies, biases and uncertainty around the best current treatment practice still exist. The resulting variation of care may result in a variable outcome. The protocol for a prospective multicentre observational study aimed at comparing the effectiveness of different treatment strategies in patients with ruptured aneurysms is presented.

Objective:

The primary aim of this study is to identify the effectiveness of clipping versus coiling on functional outcome in patients presenting with a subarachnoid haemorrhage due to a ruptured intracranial aneurysm 1 year after onset of symptoms. Secondary objectives include long term functional outcome, complications, cost-effectiveness and explorative analysis of the diagnostic and prognostic value of radiological imaging.

Study design:

This multi-centre study will have an observational prospective cohort design. Patient will have a follow-up of maximum 10 years.

Study population:

Patients with a subarachnoid haemorrhage will be included. Patients with evident other causes and patients without diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm after six months will be excluded.

Main study parameters/endpoints:

The primary endpoint is the score on the modified Rankin scale (mRs) and mortality at 1 year after the initial SAH. Secondary endpoints include the mRs, Modified Telephone Interview of Cognitive Status (TICS-M), 5-level EuroQol-5D (EQ-5D-5L) and derived Quality of Life Years, costs from patient diaries, and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), measured at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years.

Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:

Patients will receive 'nonexperimental' regular care during their hospital stay. For this study, health questionnaires and functional outcome will be assessed at baseline, follow-up visits and before discharge. Temporary fatigue is the only possible side-effect of completion of the questionnaires.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Estimated)

880

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Contact Backup

Study Locations

      • Amsterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Amsterdam UMC
        • Contact:
          • Dagmar Verbaan
      • Den Haag, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Haaglanden Medical Center
        • Contact:
          • Rick Vreeburg, MD
          • Phone Number: +31(0)88-9792165
      • Maastricht, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Maastricht UMC
        • Contact:
          • Roel Haeren
      • Nijmegen, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Radboudumc
        • Contact:
          • Jeroen Boogaarts
      • Rotterdam, Netherlands
        • Recruiting
        • Erasmus MC
        • Contact:
          • Ruben Dammers
      • Utrecht, Netherlands

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Adult
  • Older Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

All patients that present primarily or after acute referral (in-patient to in-patient) to the participating centres, with a spontaneous subarachnoid haemorrhage will be screened for eligibility for this study by the treating physicians or local research nurses.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of subarachnoid haemorrhage on CT-scan or lumbar puncture (in the presence of a negative CT-scan)
  • Intracranial aneurysm proven within 6 months to be the cause of subarachnoid haemorrhage
  • Age 18 years or over at presentation.
  • Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subarachnoid haemorrhage deemed most likely of 'perimesencephalic' origin after consideration of history, clinical examination and radiological findings (including angiographic imaging)
  • Subarachnoid haemorrhage deemed most likely of post-traumatic origin after consideration of history, clinical examination and radiological findings (including angiographic imaging)
  • Diagnosis of intracerebral arteriovenous malformations or dural arteriovenous fistula.
  • No diagnosis of intracranial aneurysm at 6 months after onset of symptoms.
  • Not mastering the Dutch language

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Neurosurgical treatment
This cohort contains the patients with aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who received the neurosurgical clipping treatment.
Endovascular treatment
This cohort contains the patients with neurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage who received the endovascular coiling treatment. Other endovascular treatments which will be included as well are flow diverter procedures, Woven EndoBridge (WEB) devices and stent assisted coiling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
The score on the modified Rankin Scale at 1 year after onset of symptoms.
Time Frame: 1 year after onset of symptoms
Scoring of functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale. The scale has a minimum value of 0, meaning no symptoms, and a maximum value of 6, meaning dead. The modified Rankin Scale measures the degree of dependence. A higher score means a worse outcome.
1 year after onset of symptoms

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
modified Rankin Scale at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms, as measured by completion of case report forms by local treating teams
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Scoring of functional outcome using the modified Rankin Scale. The scale has a minimum value of 0, meaning no symptoms, and a maximum value of 6, meaning dead. The modified Rankin Scale measures the degree of dependence. A higher score means a worse outcome.
6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset as measured by completion of case report forms by local treating teams
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Scoring of cognitive outcome using the Modified Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status. This type of scoring contains multiple elements for detecting anamnestic mild cognitive impairment. The score ranges from 0 to 50, a higher score means a better outcome.
6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
5-level EuroQol-5D questionnaire at 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms, as measured by completion of questionnaires by subjects
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Scoring of quality of life using the 5-level EuroQol-5D questionnaire. The questionnaire contains 5 scores in 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each dimension has 5 levels: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. A higher score means a worse outcome.
6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Health associated costs questionnaire
Time Frame: 3 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Estimation of societal costs by completion of a custom healthcare consumption and loss of productivity (paid and unpaid) questionnaire at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, 5 years and 10 years.
3 months, 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recanalization or recurrence of the treated aneurysm.
Time Frame: 6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms
Degree of occlusion in % of the aneurysm measured on imaging during follow-up using Computed Tomography, Diagnostic Angiography or Magnetic Resonance Imaging. A higher degree of occlusion means a better outcome.
6 months, 1, 2, 5 and 10 years after onset of symptoms

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Wouter Moojen, MD, PhD, Haaglanden Medical Center

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

July 14, 2021

Primary Completion (Estimated)

July 14, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

July 14, 2034

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 22, 2023

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 1, 2023

First Posted (Actual)

May 10, 2023

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

March 25, 2025

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 22, 2025

Last Verified

March 1, 2025

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

UNDECIDED

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe